1 / 16

Development of a New Inspection Regime by the Paris MoU

Development of a New Inspection Regime by the Paris MoU. Panama Maritime IX 8-11 February 2009. New Inspection Regime – NIR. In force 1 January 2011 Developed by Paris MoU Task Force 31 Recasting of EU Directive 95/21/EC in parallel. Paris MOU on Port State Control.

amora
Download Presentation

Development of a New Inspection Regime by the Paris MoU

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Development of aNew Inspection Regimeby the Paris MoU Panama Maritime IX8-11 February 2009

  2. New Inspection Regime – NIR • In force 1 January 2011 • Developed by Paris MoU Task Force 31 • Recasting of EU Directive 95/21/EC in parallel Paris MOU on Port State Control

  3. New Inspection Regime – NIR System of risk based targeting, selection and inspection based on following principles: • Ensure full coverage of ships visiting ports and anchorages • Adhere to provisions of IMO and ILO Conventions • Establish risk profiles for ships • Define intervals between inspections • Reduce inspection intervals for LRS • Increase inspection intervals for HRS Paris MOU on Port State Control

  4. New Inspection Regime – NIR Principles (continued): • Include performance of company in risk profile • Extend refusal of access to all ship types • Share total inspection commitments fairly • Extend reporting requirements of pilots to deep sea pilots • Target ships which carry noxious and dangerous cargo • Prevent ports of convenience • Maintain quality and efficiency of current regime • Use resources efficiently • Establish areas of inspection based on risk Paris MOU on Port State Control

  5. Ship Risk Profile • Final version agreed in December 2008: • Instead of a target factor every ship has a risk profile based on: • Type, age, flag, RO • Company – an important new development • Detentions and deficiencies • A ship will be either High, Standard or Low Risk Paris MOU on Port State Control

  6. HRS = 5 points * LRS = all criteria * SRS = not HRS or LRS

  7. > Ship Risk Profile For example the following combinations have 5 points: a) Oil tanker (2 pts.), black listed flag, HR (2 pts.), and low RO performance (1 pt.) b) Container ship (0 pts.), more than 12 years old (1 pt.), black listed flag, MR to HR (2 pts.), very low RO performance (1 pt.), and ≥ 2 detentions in last 36 months (1 pt.) c) Bulk carrier (2 pt.), black listed flag, VHR (2 pts.), and ≥ 2 detentions in last 36 months (1 pt.) d) General cargo ship (0 pts.), more than 12 years old (1 pt.), low RO performance (1 pt.), low company performance (2 pts.), and ≥ 2 detentions in last 36 months (1 pt.)

  8. Company performance Company Performance Formula: • Taking into account detention and deficiency history of all ships in a (ISM) company’s fleet • Calculated daily over a 36 month period • ISM deficiencies 5 points. Others 1 point • Refusal of access (banning): above average detention index • Performance: high, medium, low, very low Paris MOU on Port State Control

  9. > Periodic Inspections Every ship eligible for a periodic inspection as follows: • High Risk Ship (HRS) every 5-6 months • Standard Risk Ship (SRS) every 10-12 months • Low Risk Ship (LRS) every 24-36 months

  10. Periodic Inspections continued • When the “inspection window” opens it is Priority II it may be inspected • When the “inspection window” is closed it is Priority I it must be inspected

  11. Additional Inspections Other factors can trigger an additional inspection • Overriding factors are Priority I – for example: • collision • illegal discharge • unsafe manoeuvring • suspended or withdrawn class • not in database >

  12. Additional Inspections continued • Unexpected factors are Priority II – for example: • outstanding deficiencies • previously detained ships (after 3 months) • complaint • cargo problems • Recommended pilotage scheme not followed in entrance to Baltic Sea

  13. Expanded Inspections • Periodic inspections will be expanded for all HRS and risky types (tanker,bulker,pax)>12 years old • Additional inspections may be expanded according to the professional judgement of the PSCO if HRS or risky type >12 years old

  14. Scope of inspections • Initial checks overall condition as with current regime • Expanded checks: • overall condition in a list of 14 risk areas e.g. weather tightness, emergency systems, living conditions PLUS • a list of specified items for each ship type >

  15. Scope of inspections continued • More detailed checks: • the risk areas where clear grounds are established • the risk areas relevant to any overriding or unexpected factors • other risk areas at random • The depth of inspection in each area or on each specified item remains the professional judgement of PSCO

  16. Simplified banning procedures • Applies to ALL ship types (currently only oil, gas, chemical bulk and passenger) • >2 detentions in 3 years if black flag • >2 detentions in 2 years if grey flag • Plus minimum period of ban • 3 months for 1st ban • 12 months for 2nd ban • 24 months for 3rd ban, conditional • 4th ban will be indefinite >

More Related