1 / 30

Using Copulas

Using Copulas. Multi-variate Distributions. Usually the distribution of a sum of random variables is needed When the distributions are correlated, getting the distribution of the sum requires calculation of the entire joint probability distribution

Download Presentation

Using Copulas

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Using Copulas

  2. Multi-variate Distributions • Usually the distribution of a sum of random variables is needed • When the distributions are correlated, getting the distribution of the sum requires calculation of the entire joint probability distribution • F(x, y, z) = Probability (X < x and Y < y and Z < z) • Copulas provide a convenient way to do this calculation • From that you can get the distribution of the sum

  3. Correlation Issues • In many cases, correlation is stronger for large events • Can model this by copula methods • Quantifying correlation • Degree of correlation • Part of distribution correlated • Can also do by conditional distributions • Say X and Y are Pareto • Could specify Y|X like F(y|x) = 1 – [y/(1+x/40)]-2 • Conditional specification gives a copula and copula gives a conditional, so they are equivalent • But the conditional distributions that relate to common copulas would be hard to dream up

  4. Modeling via Copulas • Correlate on probabilities • Inverse map probabilities to correlate losses • Can specify where correlation takes place in the probability range • Conditional distribution easily expressed • Simulation readily available

  5. Formal Rules – Bivariate Case • F(x,y) = C(FX(x),FY(y)) • Joint distribution is copula evaluated at the marginal distributions • Expresses joint distribution as inter-dependency applied to the individual distributions • C(u,v) = F(FX-1(u),FY-1(v)) • u and v are unit uniforms, F maps R2 to [0,1] • Shows that any bivariate distribution can be expressed via a copula • FY|X(y|x) = C1(FX(x),FY(y)) • Derivative of the copula gives the conditional distribution • E.g., C(u,v) = uv, C1(u,v) = v = Pr(V<v|U=u) • So independence copula

  6. Correlation • Kendall tau and rank correlation depend only on copula, not marginals • Not true for linear correlation rho • Tau may be defined as: –1+4E[C(u,v)]

  7. Example C(u,v) Functions • Frank: -a-1ln[1 + gugv/g1], with gz = e-az – 1 • t(a) = 1 – 4/a + 4/a20at/(et-1) dt • FV|U(v) = g1e-au/(g1+gugv) • Gumbel: exp{- [(- ln u)a + (- ln v)a]1/a}, a  1 • t(a) = 1 – 1/a • HRT: u + v – 1+[(1 – u)-1/a + (1 – v)-1/a – 1]-a • t(a) = 1/(2a + 1) • FV|U(v) = 1 – [(1 – u)-1/a + (1 – v)-1/a – 1]-a-1 (1 – u)-1-1/a • Normal: C(u,v) = B(p(u),p(v);a) i.e., bivariate normal applied to normal percentiles of u and v, correlation a • t(a) = 2arcsin(a)/p

  8. Copulas Differ in Tail EffectsLight Tailed Copulas Joint Lognormal

  9. Copulas Differ in Tail EffectsHeavy Tailed Copulas Joint Lognormal

  10. Quantifying Tail Concentration • L(z) = Pr(U<z|V<z) • R(z) = Pr(U>z|V>z) • L(z) = C(z,z)/z • R(z) = [1 – 2z +C(z,z)]/(1 – z) • L(1) = 1 = R(0) • Action is in R(z) near 1 and L(z) near 0 • lim R(z), z->1 is R, and lim L(z), z->0 is L

  11. LR Function(L below ½, R above)

  12. Auto and Fire Claims in French Windstorms

  13. MLE Estimates of Copulas

  14. Modified Tail Concentration Functions • Modified function is R(z)/(1 – z) • Both MLE and R function show that HRT fits best

  15. The t- copula adds tail correlation to the normal copula but maintains the same overall correlation, essentially by adding some negative correlation in the middle of the distribution Strong in the tails Some negative correlation

  16. Easy to simulate t-copula • Generate a multi-variate normal vector with the same correlation matrix – using Cholesky, etc. • Divide vector by (y/n)0.5 where y is a number simulated from a chi-squared distribution with n degrees of freedom • This gives a t-distributed vector • The t-distribution Fn with n degrees of freedom can then be applied to each element to get the probability vector • Those probabilities are simulations of the copula • Apply, for example, inverse lognormal distributions to these probabilities to get a vector of lognormal samples correlated via this copula • Common shock copula – dividing by the same chi-squared is a common shock

  17. Other descriptive functions • tau is defined as –1+40101 C(u,v)c(u,v)dvdu. • cumulative tau: J(z) = –1+40z0z C(u,v)c(u,v)dvdu/C(z,z)2. • expected value of V given U<z.M(z) = E(V|U<z) = 0z01 vc(u,v)dvdu/z.

  18. Cumulative tau for data and fit (US cat data)

  19. Conditional expected value data vs. fits

  20. Loss and LAE Simulated Data from ISO • Cases with LAE = 0 had smaller losses • Cases with LAE > 0 but loss = 0 had smaller LAE • So just looked at case where both positive

  21. Probability Correlation

  22. Fit Some Copulas

  23. Best Fitting

  24. Fit Severity

  25. Loss

  26. Joint Distribution • F(x,y) = C(FX(x),FY(y)) • Gumbel: exp{-[(- ln u)a + (- ln v)a]1/a}, a  • Inverse Weibull u = FX(x) = e-(b/x)p, v = FY(y) = e-(c/y)q, • F(x,y) = exp{-[(b/x)ap + (c/y)aq]1/a} • FY|X(y|x) = exp{-[(b/x)ap + (c/y)aq]1/a}[(b/x)ap + (c/y)aq]1/a-1(b/x)ap-pe(b/x)p • .

  27. Make Your Own Copula • If you know FX(x) and FY|<X(y|X<x) then the joint distribution is their product. If you also know FY(y) then you can define the copula C(u,v) = F(FX-1(u),FY-1(v)) • Say for inverse exponential FY(y) = e-c/y, you could define FY|<X(y|X<x) by e-c(1+d/x)r/y if you wanted to • Then with FX(x) = e-(b/x)p, F(x,y) = e-(b/x)pe-c(1+d/x)r/y • Inverse Weibull u = FX(x) = e-(b/x)p, v = FY(y) = e-c/y, FX-1(u) = b(-ln(u))-1/p FY-1(v) = -c/ln(v) so • C(u,v) = uv[1+(d/b)(-ln(u))1/p])r • Can fit that copula to data. Tried by fitting to the LR function

  28. Adding Our Own Copula to the Fit

  29. Conclusions • Copulas allow correlation of different parts of distributions • Tail functions help describe and fit • For multi-variate distributions, t-copula is convenient

  30. finis

More Related