1 / 19

Content-Based Routing in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks

Content-Based Routing in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks. Milenko Petrovic, Vinod Muthusamy, Hans-Arno Jacobsen University of Toronto July 18, 2005. MobiQuitous 2005 San Diego, CA. Mobile Ad Hoc Networks. Mobile Ad Hoc Network Autonomous system of wireless mobile routers Characteristics

akio
Download Presentation

Content-Based Routing in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Content-Based Routing in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks Milenko Petrovic, Vinod Muthusamy, Hans-Arno Jacobsen University of Toronto July 18, 2005 MobiQuitous 2005San Diego, CA

  2. Mobile Ad Hoc Networks • Mobile Ad Hoc Network • Autonomous system of wireless mobile routers • Characteristics • Varying bandwidth, latency, connectivity • Mobile nodes, and highly dynamic topology • Applications • Interactive games, location based advertising, mobile auctions, financial services, selective information dissemination • Communication primitives • Unicast • Broadcast • Multicast Content-Based Routing in MANET

  3. Content Based Routing in MANET • Content Based Routing (a.k.a. publish/subscribe) • Unicast, multicast, broadcast • No addresses loose coupling • Supports large number of fine-grained groups • Expressive group membership • Applications • Stock updates • Mobile games • Accident information dissemination Content-Based Routing in MANET

  4. Agenda • Background: Publish/Subscribe • Model • Wired distributed algorithm • Benefits • Content-Based Routing • Protocols • Evaluation • Conclusions Content-Based Routing in MANET

  5. Notification Notification Publish/Subscribe Model TSX Stock markets NASDAQ NYSE Publisher Publisher AMGN=58 Publications IBM=84 ORCL=12 JNJ=58 HON=24 INTC=19 MSFT=27 BrokerNetwork Subscriptions: IBM > 85 ORCL < 10 JNJ > 60 Subscriptions Subscriber Subscriber Content-Based Routing in MANET

  6. Subscriber Subscriber Publisher Distributed Publish/Subscribe . . . . . . • Advertisements flooded • Create ad tree • Subscriptions propagate along reverse ad path • Create multicast tree • Publications propagate along reverse sub path Advertisements Subscriptions Publications Content-Based Routing in MANET

  7. Publish/Subscribe Benefits • Simple interface • Decoupling of producers and consumers of data • Address • Content-based routing • Anonymity • Platform • Space • Time • Representation (semantic) • Efficient data dissemination (scalability) • Push model • Multicast Content-Based Routing in MANET

  8. Content Based Routing in MANET • Challenges • Highly dynamic network • Fault tolerance, reliability • CBR (Content-Based Routing) • Based on wired pub/sub protocols • FT-CBR (Fault-Tolerant CBR) • Adapt to node mobility • RAFT-CBR (Reliable And Fault-Tolerant CBR) • Guaranteed delivery Content-Based Routing in MANET

  9. CBR Protocol • Based on distributed pub/sub protocols • Broadcast ads • Build connectivity graph • Unicast subs • Setup multicast route • Soft state • Beacon ads and subs • Passive route repairs P S Advertisements Subscriptions Publications Content-Based Routing in MANET

  10. Protocol Optimizations • Covering optimization • Common in pub/sub systems • Quench subsumed subscriptions • Most Covering (MC) optimization • Forward subscription toward existing multicast tree • Tradeoff route length for transmission and storage • Builds more stable multicast trees P S3 B S1 S2 Subscriptions Content-Based Routing in MANET

  11. FT-CBR Protocol • Routes broken due to node mobility • Hop by hop reliability • Proactive route repairs • Hop by hop ACK of messages • On unack’d message • Expanding ring search to find destination node P S PublicationAcknowledgement Content-Based Routing in MANET

  12. RAFT-CBR Protocol Difficulties of RAFT-CBR • End to end reliability • Difficult to ensure in CBR • No ad or sub state maintained • Reuse underlying unicast routing protocol • Assume publisher is reliable and knows subscriber set • Include (dest, seq) pair in each publication • Subscribers send cumulative ACKs and selective NACKs • Hierarchical ACK propagation P S 1 2 3 4 5 6 S1 1 3 4 5 P S2 2 5 6 P S2 S3 S1 PublicationAcknowledgement Content-Based Routing in MANET

  13. Evaluation • Simulation Environment • ns-2 network simulator • Implemented CBR protocols • Shopping district scenario • Vendors advertise to shoppers in a shopping district • Shoppers interested in nearby stores • Parameters • 50 mobile nodes (subscribers) • Stationary publisher • Random publications • Metrics • Delivery ratio • Delivery delay • Message load Content-Based Routing in MANET

  14. Subscriber Scalability • Delivery ratio • 75% for CBR, ~100% for FT-CBR • Delivery delay • Little change • Little change in multicast tree depth • No recovery mechanisms (CBR) • Message cost • FT-CBR high due to expanding ring search Content-Based Routing in MANET

  15. Effects of Optimizations • Covering and most-covering (MC) optimizations • MC improves delivery by 10% points … • Benefits increase with more subscribers • ... but increases delay and message load • Costs diminish with larger multicast trees • Covering significantly reduces message load Content-Based Routing in MANET

  16. Interest Locality • Vary number of subscribers with static interest • Leads to less stable and larger multicast trees • MC optimization has largest impact • Makes more stable (but longer) multicast trees Content-Based Routing in MANET

  17. Related Work • Little research into fully content-based pub/sub protocols in MANET • Wired CBR protocols • Typically assume stable acyclic topologies • Multicast in MANET • MAODV, DVMRP, ODMRP • Group-based (not content-based) • Reliability protocols not applicable to content-based Content-Based Routing in MANET

  18. Conclusions • Publish/Subscribe content based routing • Appropriate for mobile networks • No “best” protocol • CBR: Low delay, message cost • Streaming media applications • FT-CBR: Adapts to dynamic environments • High mobility applications • RAFT-CBR: Reliable • Financial applications • Future work • More protocols • Combine best of existing protocols • More experiments • Mobile subscribers, realistic scenarios, etc. Content-Based Routing in MANET

  19. Q&A Content-Based Routing in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks www.msrg.utoronto.ca Content-Based Routing in MANET

More Related