1 / 15

Adaptive Goal Recognition

Adaptive Goal Recognition. Neal Lesh. Presented by Don Patterson. Goal Recognition. To infer a person’s intentions given a partial view of their actions Let A be a sequence of actions (  A*) Let G be a set of goals (  G*) A recognizer R : A*  ( G*  {nil})

aggie
Download Presentation

Adaptive Goal Recognition

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Adaptive Goal Recognition Neal Lesh Presented by Don Patterson

  2. Goal Recognition • To infer a person’s intentions given a partial view of their actions • Let A be a sequence of actions (A*) • Let G be a set of goals ( G*) • A recognizer R : A* ( G*  {nil}) • a program that takes an action sequence and predicts a goal or declines to make a prediction 590 HK Spring 2002: Adaptive Goal Recognition by Neal Lesh

  3. Adaptive Goal Recognition • Adds modifiers to R • Let T* be a set of adaptations • A recognizer RT is a recognizer that has had a subset T of T* applied to it. • To personalize we will remember a different set, T, for each person 590 HK Spring 2002: Adaptive Goal Recognition by Neal Lesh

  4. Examples • A:(get pan,get egg,put butter in pan) • G*:(cook an egg, clean-up) • R(A): • if (get egg)  A ) • then predict G = (cook an egg) • else predict G = (clean-up) 590 HK Spring 2002: Adaptive Goal Recognition by Neal Lesh

  5. Examples • A: (get pan, get egg, put butter in pan) • G*:(cook an egg, clean-up) • T: (put butter in pan) • RT(A): • if ((get egg)  A ) or ((T  A)  {nil}) • then G = (cook an egg) • else G = (clean-up) 590 HK Spring 2002: Adaptive Goal Recognition by Neal Lesh

  6. Metrics • How are we going to compare our adapted recognizers? • Accuracy: How many times did RT(A) return the correct goal, G? • Coverage: How many times did RT(A) return non-{nil}? How many times did it make a guess? • Score: a function which unifies accuracy and coverage: • S(accuracy, coverage) 590 HK Spring 2002: Adaptive Goal Recognition by Neal Lesh

  7. Adapt the goal recognizer • Let D be the training data • Consists of a set E of “episodes” • An episode is a start state and a sequence of actions (S,{a1,a2,a3,…,an}) • Estimate(R,D) • Returns Accuracy and Coverage of R on D • Running time • Verify the true goal |E| times, once per training example. • Execute the Recognizer |E| * n. Once for every action in the training example. • R({a1} • R({a1,a2}) … • R({a1,a2,a3,…, an}) 590 HK Spring 2002: Adaptive Goal Recognition by Neal Lesh

  8. Adapt the goal recognizer • Adapt(R,T,D) • Greedily add adaptations to RuntilEstimate(RT,D) reaches a local maximum. • Running time • O(|T|2) calls to Estimate • Overall run time: • O(|T|2*[|D|*(O(Verify)+n*O(RT))]) • O(|T|2*|D|*n*O(RT)) 590 HK Spring 2002: Adaptive Goal Recognition by Neal Lesh

  9. Validation • Robustness to systematic non-goal oriented actions inserted into the training data: • Example: Every time I turn on the stove I open the door to check that nothing is in it. • Example: Every time I type “cd” I also type “ls” regardless of what I’m doing. • Ability of the goal recognizer to help • How often does the computer make a correct guess? • Impact of noisy training data 590 HK Spring 2002: Adaptive Goal Recognition by Neal Lesh

  10. Robustness 590 HK Spring 2002: Adaptive Goal Recognition by Neal Lesh

  11. Robustness 590 HK Spring 2002: Adaptive Goal Recognition by Neal Lesh

  12. Ability to Help 590 HK Spring 2002: Adaptive Goal Recognition by Neal Lesh

  13. Impact of Noise 590 HK Spring 2002: Adaptive Goal Recognition by Neal Lesh

  14. Observations • Strengths: • Recognizer independent • Proofs of trade-off between accuracy and coverage • Unsupervised 590 HK Spring 2002: Adaptive Goal Recognition by Neal Lesh

  15. Challenges for Assisted Cognition • Adapt assumes discrete adaptations • Probabilities and continuous parameters are probably going to need to be handled. • Adaptations must be well chosen • This specific recognizer/adaptation pair wouldn’t appear to handle random noise well • If actions are identified incorrectly then the system will likely fail. 590 HK Spring 2002: Adaptive Goal Recognition by Neal Lesh

More Related