1 / 35

CP Violation and Rare Decays in Hyperon and Charm Systems

CP Violation and Rare Decays in Hyperon and Charm Systems. NTU. Xiao-Gang He. Collaborators: Donoghue, Pakvasa, Tandean, Valencia. Antiproton Physics Workshop, Fermilab, 22 May, 2010. Outline. CPV in Hyperon Decays in the SM and Beyond HyperCP X Particle and Some Implications

admon
Download Presentation

CP Violation and Rare Decays in Hyperon and Charm Systems

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CP Violation and Rare Decays in Hyperon and Charm Systems NTU Xiao-Gang He Collaborators: Donoghue, Pakvasa, Tandean, Valencia Antiproton Physics Workshop, Fermilab, 22 May, 2010

  2. Outline • CPV in Hyperon Decays in the SM and Beyond • HyperCP X Particle and Some Implications • Charm Sector with New Physics

  3. Contributed to 4th International Symposium on Symmetries in Subatomic Physics, Taipei, Taiwan, 2-5 Jun 2009.

  4. CPV in Hyperon Decays in the SM and Beyond

  5. HyperCP X Particle and Some ImplicationsHyperCP’s findings • What’s the up-to-date SM prediction? Old calculation by Bergstrom, Safadi, Singer (1988) • Do the observed 3 events hint at new physics?

  6. From talk by HK Park (HyperCP) Interpretations of Results: S+ → pP0, P0 → m+m- Data MC: S+ → pm+m- S+ → pP0 , P0 → m+m-(MC) • Dimuon masses for 3 candidates are clustered within ~ 1 MeV/c2. • Probability for dimuon masses of 3 events to be within 1 MeV for S+ → pm+m- decays is less than 1%. • Suggests two-body decays, S+ → pP0, P0 → m+m-: Data

  7. Standard model expectations • Long-distance contributions dominate Σ+→pμ+μ−decay. • The resulting branching ratio He, JT, Valencia agrees well with the HyperCP measurement (under the assumption of no new physics) • The lower end of the predicted rate leaves room for attributing all the 3 observed events to new physics.

  8. Standard model expectations • Distribution of dimuon invariant mass Mμμ(solid curves) He, JT, Valencia • Different graphs reflect uncertainty in the calculation. • Not surprisingly, the predicted distributions show no sharp peak anywhere.

  9. New-particle interpretations • The possibility that a new particle, X, is responsible for the HyperCP events has been theoretically explored to some extent in the literature • X may be spinless • Pseudoscalar sgoldstino in supersymmetric models Gorbunov et al. • CP-odd Higgs boson in the next-to-minimal supersymmetric standard model (NMSSM) He, JT, Valencia • X may be a spin-1 particle • Gauge (U) boson of an extra U(1) gauge group in some extensions of the SM. Chen, Geng, Kao He, JT, Valencia Deshpande, Eilam, Jiang Geng, Hsiao . . . . .

  10. Constraints on bbXcouplings for spinless X • CLEO • BaBar

  11. Constraints from K  π  μ+μ−data • With only the 2-quark contributions being present, the scalar gS (vector gV) part of the sdX coupling in the spinless (spin 1) case is constrained by K π  μ+μ−data to be negligibly small. • The pseudoscalar gP (axial-vector gA) part can be probed by Kππμ+μ− He, JT, Valencia Deshpande, Eilam, Jiang NTU PPJC, 7 Dec 2009

  12. Search for KLπ0π 0X, Xγγ • This constrains some sgoldstino scenarios.

  13. Searches for KLπ0π 0X, Xμ+μ− • Preliminary results reported at KAON09

  14. From talk by D Phillips (KTeV)

  15. Implications of KTeV results • KTeV measurements • Same number for spinless or spin-1 X • Predictions for spin-1 X(with real sdX coupling) He, JT, Valencia • This is well below the KTeV upper-bound and could get lower in the presence of an imaginary part of the sdX coupling • Thus the axial-vector (gA) part the sdX coupling is not well constrained From talk by D Phillips (KTeV)

  16. Search for B 0 K *0X, ρ0X, Xμ+μ− at Belle From talk by H Hyun (Belle) 29

  17. Charm Sector with New Physics

  18. Divergences treated by dimensional regularization with a cut off

  19. Large contributions to D^0 – \bar D^0 mixing and CP violation. c -> u gamma. ….

More Related