470 likes | 603 Views
CP Violation and Rare R Decays. Paoti Chang National Taiwan University From LHC to the Universe NTU, Taipei December 15, 2008. KM Mechanism. CP violation is due to a complex phase in quark mixing matrix. f 2 ( a ). V ud V* ub. V td V* tb. Unitarity Matrix
E N D
CP Violation and Rare R Decays Paoti Chang National Taiwan University From LHC to the Universe NTU, Taipei December 15, 2008 from LHC to the Universe
KM Mechanism CP violation is due to a complex phase in quark mixing matrix f2(a) VudV*ub VtdV*tb Unitarity Matrix VudV*ub + VcdV*cb +VtdV*tb = 0 f3(g) f1(b) VcdV*cb from LHC to the Universe
NobelPrize 2008 from LHC to the Universe
Time dependent CP Asymmetry • Asymmetry in Dt shape implies ICPV. • Difference in area indicates DCPV from LHC to the Universe
Measurement in Principle • Fully reconstruct a CP eigenstate. • Determine the flavor the tag side. • From the distance of the two B decay vertices to • measure the decay time difference. from LHC to the Universe
Is there New physics? • Is KM mechanism the source of CPV? (Main reason why B factory was built?) • Is it the only source? New Physics? • NP may appear in rare B decays. • clean probe for NP. fBs not covered Current Universe SM not enough Direct or Indirect CP violation, branching fraction… from LHC to the Universe
The Duel of B Factories Mt. Tsukuba from LHC to the Universe
Successful Operation BFactory is also a t-charm factory. peak L =1.71x1034 Bs physics can be studied when runs at U(5S) peak L =1.21x1034 from LHC to the Universe
Results from LHC to the Universe
Measurement of f1/b CP violation in the B system was already established. from LHC to the Universe
From all Measurements B factories: df1~2o, df2 ~10o, df3 ~15o-30o from LHC to the Universe
s s s s s d d Time dependent CPV in b→s Penguin Sf = sin2f1; Cf = -A golden mode + sin2f1/sin2b DS = sin2f1(sqq)– sin2f1(ccs) • May have tree pollution. • Theoretical expectation: for penguin dominant modes DS>0 within 0.05 • Clean signals for new physics New physics phase in the loop causes deviation Stand Model DS ~ 0 s d d from LHC to the Universe
DS results before ICHEP 2008 PRL 99, 161802 (2007) Based on KKK Dalitz analysis 535 M PRL 98, 031802 (2007) For most modes, DS(SM) is positive. h'K0: sin2f1eff: +0.64± 0.10 ± 0.04 from LHC to the Universe
Decay Modes with Updated Results • Class A: h’K0, wKS Same method as J/Y K0 • Class B: K0p0 • Class C: p+p-KS, K+K-KS • Class D: fKSp0 : • No tracks on B decay vertex. • Require tacks with SVD hits. • Perform fit by constraining C. • Model the Dalitz distributions. • Many parameters: phase, • S and C for each mode …. Low statistics. Need to know the CP content. Use results from fK+p-. Class is characterized by the analysis complexity. from LHC to the Universe
f1 measured with penguins from LHC to the Universe
Time dependent Dalitz from LHC to the Universe
f1/b with all penguin modes from LHC to the Universe
+ 0.006 -0.107± 0.016 BaBar Direct CP Violation in B→Kp Decays New Update Belle Results: Nature 452, 332 (2008) { - 0.004 -0.094± 0.018 ± 0.008 Belle Acp(K+p-) = -0.086± 0.023 ± 0.009 CDF -0.04± 0.16 ± 0.02 CLEO + 0.012 -0.098 @ 8.1sAVG - 0.011 { +0.030± 0.039± 0.010BaBar Acp(K+p0) = +0.07± 0.03± 0.01 Belle -0.29± 0.23± 0.02CLEO +0.050± 0.025 @ 2.0sAVG DAKp = Acp(K+p-) - Acp(K+p0)= -0.147± 0.028 @ 5.3s from LHC to the Universe
DAKp Puzzle /T Expectation from current theory T & P are dominant DAKp ~ 0 T P C PEW T P • Enhancement of large C with large strong phase to T strong inter. !? • Enhancement of large PEW Newphysics Yoshikawa 2003; Mishima & Yoshikawa 2004; Buras et. al. 2004, 2006; Baek & London 2007; Hou et. al. 2007; Feldmann, Jung & Mannel 2008 Chiang et. al. 2004 Li, Mishima & Sanda 2005 from LHC to the Universe
Acp(K0p0) DA(Kp) • Sum rule predicts Acp(K0p0) = -0.151±0.043 Model independent checks for NP • M. Gronau, PLB 627, 82 (2005); D. Atwood & A. Soni, Phys. Rev. D 58,036005(1998). New B+→ K0p+ B0→ K0p0 Sum rule A = -0.13 ± 0.13 ± 0.03 A = +0.14 ± 0.13 ± 0.06 HFAG AVG: -0.01 ± 0.10 P dominants. Acp(K0p+)~ 0 World Average Important topic for Super B factory Acp(K0p+)= 0.009±0.025 from LHC to the Universe
First observation of direct CP violation in charged B decays • Dalitz analysis on B+ K+p+p- 657M BB, BELLE-CONF-0827 383M BB, PRD78, 012004, 08 B+ B- B- B+ all cosq >0 K+ cosq < 0 q p- p+ r0 ,f0 +3 ACP (B±→r0K±) =(+41±10±3 )% @4.0s -7 +5 ACP (B±→r0K±) =(+44±10±4 )% @3.7s -13 from LHC to the Universe
B+→t+n • In SM, decay rate related to decay constant and Vub + 0.09 B(B→tn)= ( 0.78 )x10-4 (CKM fitter 2008 prediction) - 0.13 • Charged Higgs may contribute to BF. destructive W.S. Hou, PRD 48, 2342 (1993) • Previous results: Belle hadronic tag BaBar hadronic & semileptonic tags +0.56+0.46 B(B→tn) = (1.79) x 10-4 B(B→tn) = (1.2 ± 0.4 ± 0.3 ± 0.2) x 10-4 -0.49-0.51 383 M BBwith2.6s 447 M BBwith3.5s from LHC to the Universe
+ 0.38+ 0.35 B(B→tn)= (1.65 )x10-4 - 0.37- 0.37 New Belle Result on B+→t+n NEW with 3.8s 657 M BB with D(*)l n tag • Tag on D(*)ln • Search for t→euu, mnn, pn • Check extra energy in ECAL • Understand background from the control sample Larger parameter space signals exclude +36 +20 Nsig = 154 (stat) (syst) -35 -22 from LHC to the Universe
New BaBar Result on B+→t+n Tag on D(*)ln, look for t→enn, mnn, pn, rn from LHC to the Universe
+0.9 -0.8 Tension in the CKM fit Belle (Bx104) BaBar (Bx104) My Avg. B = (1.73±0.35)x10-4 +0.56+0.46 Had. Tags 1.79 1.8 ±0.4 -0.49+0.51 +0.38+0.35 Dln Tags 1.65 1.8±0.8±0.1 -0.37-0.37 +0.09 deviation = 2.6 s • CKM fitter obtained B = (0.78 ) x10-4 -0.13 • B = (1.2 ±0.4) x10-4 using Note that interference is destructive in 2HDM (type II). B >BSM implies that H+ contribution dominates from LHC to the Universe
B (B→tn) vs sin2f1/2b • Using ratio, the relation is • independent of fB and Vub • Belle and BaBar will • have new updates soon. • Good topics for the • future Super B factory 1s deviation from LHC to the Universe
B (B→Xsg) | Eg > 1.6 GeV SM New physics B→Xsg arXiv:0804.1580 Belle update with Eg >1.7 GeV: Eg min SM NNLO calculation: { HFAG 2008: (3.15±0.23)x10-4 Misiak et al. B ( B→Xs g ) | = (3.52±0.25)x10-4 = (2.98±0.26)x10-4 Becher Neubertv Eg > 1.6 GeV (3.47±0.49)x10-4 Anderson Gardi from LHC to the Universe
Charged Higgs Bound The 95% lower bound of charged Higgs mass as a function of B(B→Xsg) and its error. HFAG 2008 . MH+ > 300 GeV/c2 @ 95% C.L. for all tanb from LHC to the Universe
b→ s l+ l- • Loop dominant Small BF ; good place for new physics! • Contributions from three coefficients: C7 : EM penguin; C9 (C10 ): vector (axial vector) part of weak diagrams • More observables sensitive to NP: Leff = S Ci Oi , Ci (short distance effect). SM expects real Ci eff eff eff • AFB(q2): • e+e-m+m- indication of Z0 • b s l+ l-: - FB lepton asymmetry, AFB - K* polarization, FL - CP asymmetry, ACP - Isospin asymmetry - e/m ratio SM from LHC to the Universe
Obtain partial BF in 6 bins in q2; extrapolate the total BF. BF(BK*ll)=(10.8±1.0±0.9) x10-7 BF(BKll)=(4.8 ±0.3) x10-7 Good agreement with SM BF 657M, NEW 384M FPCP 08 • BF(BK*ll)=(11.1±1.9±0.7) x10-7 • BF(BKll)=(3.9±0.7±0.2) x10-7 +0.5-0.4 photon pole BK*ll BKll Veto events in the J/y and y’ regions -- Belle, ICHEP 08 --BABAR, FPCP 08 -- Melikhov et. al (quark model, PLB 410, 1997) -- Ali (PRD 66, 034002, 290, 2002) from LHC to the Universe
Obtain partial BF in 6 bins in q2; extrapolate the total BF. BF(BK*ll)=(10.8±1.0±0.9) x10-7 BF(BKll)=(4.8 ±0.3) x10-7 -- Belle, 08’ ICHEP -- BABAR, 08’ FPCP -- CDF, 06’ CKM Ali 02’ Good agreement with SM BF 657M, NEW 384M FPCP 08 • BF(BK*ll)=(11.1±1.9±0.7) x10-7 • BF(BKll)=(3.9±0.7±0.2) x10-7 +0.5-0.4 photon pole BK*ll BKll Veto events in the J/y and y’ regions -- Belle, ICHEP 08 --BABAR, FPCP 08 -- Melikhov et. al (quark model, PLB 410, 1997) -- Ali (PRD 66, 034002, 290, 2002) from LHC to the Universe
B (B→K(*) ee) RK = (*) B (B→K(*)mm) Lepton Flavor & CP Asymmetries * • In SM, RK ~ 1.33 and RK ~1.0. • RK is sensitive to the size of photon pole. • RK >1.0 in the two Higgs doublet model with large tanβ. (Y. Wang and D. Atwood, PRD 68, 094016, 2003) * ACP from LHC to the Universe
Unexpectedly Large Isospin Asymmetry? A = from LHC to the Universe
K* Helicity Distribution Obtain FL by a fit: from LHC to the Universe
Anomalous AFB(q2) in B→ K(*) ll ? Obtain AFB by a fit: Efficiency corrected 384 M BB 657 M BB Data show positive AFB at low q2, while the SM predicts negative AFB. At high q2, data above the SM expectation. from LHC to the Universe
Conclusion • Results start to probe NP but limited by statistics: • B → tn, AFB, isospin asymmetry •B (BXsg) strong constraint to NP • Needmuch more data to confirm theDS puzzle. DA explanation if from new physics, what is it? • LHCb: fBs, AFB on K*ll, Bs,d ll, … Super B factory: B → tn, K*nn, Acp(K0p0), ... • Look for the approval of Super KEKB in 2009! from LHC to the Universe
Backup Slides from LHC to the Universe
More on AFB SM • C7 = - C7 ? If yes, B will change! • The sign of C7 is constrained by B (Xsll). • C may be complex due to new physics. Gambino et. al, PRL94, 061803, 05 Hou et. Al, PRD77, 014016, 08 Black line: SM Blue: 4th generation Points LHCb 2 fb-1 MC Dashed area: complex C ŝ = q2/M2 (l+l-) from LHC to the Universe
Direct CP Violation on B →Xsg BaBar measurement using sum of 16 exclusive modes arXiv: 0805.4796 383 M BB SM expectation by Kagan & Neubert, PRD58, 094012 (1998) ACP ~ (0.5±0.2)% small CP asymmetry ACP = -0.011± 0.030 (stat.) ± 0.014 (syst.) from LHC to the Universe
gL M12 - - - - + B0 gR K*0 B0 K*0 tCPV on Radiative Penguin gRms/mb suppressed • No CPV seen before; this conference: Interference suppressed in SM gLms/mb suppressed K0p0g K0p+p-g K0hg K* region 1.2<M(Kp)<1.6 from LHC to the Universe
TCPV on B0K0p0 NEW 556± 32 evts For S, use candidates with SVD hits For C, all signals KSp0 657± 37 evts KLp0 239± 47 evts First Try from LHC to the Universe
TCPV on B0K0p0 NEW 556± 32 evts For S, use candidates with SVD hits For C, all signals BaBar Belle S +0.55±0.20±0.03 +0.67±0.31±0.08 C=-A +0.13±0.13±0.03 -0.14±0.13±0.06 KSp0 657± 37 evts KLp0 239± 47 evts First Try from LHC to the Universe
TCPV on h'K0, wKS and fKSp0 NEW final dataset 467 M BB wK0 • See Hirschauer’s talk for details. • For fK0p0, polarizations, yields, Acp … are constrained with fK+p- • SC = -A • h'K0+0.57±0.08±0.02 -0.08±0.06±0.02 • wKS +0.55 ±0.02-0.52 ±0.03 • f(KSp0 )0+0.97 +0.20±0.14±0.06 +0.26 +0.22 -0.20 -0.29 +0.03 -0.52 from LHC to the Universe
T-dependent Dalitz on p+p-K0 S NEW 657 M BB Decay modes considered: K*+(892)p-, K*+(1430)p-, r0K0, f0(980)KS, f0(1270)KS, fX(1300)K0, (KSp+)NR p-, (KS p-)NRp+, (p+p-)NRKS difference as systematic errors from LHC to the Universe
T-dependent Dalitz on K+K-K0 NEW S Model uses: f0(980)KS,f(1020)KS, fX(1500)KS, cc0KS, (KSK+)NRK+, (K+K-)NRKS 657 M BB from LHC to the Universe
Lb L mm EXP, SM MSSM C7geff>0 Future Prospects for AFB(q2) 5ab-1 MC study of SuperB 50 ab-1 MC study of SuperB LHCb 2fb-1 ATLAS 30 fb-1 from LHC to the Universe
Lb L mm EXP, SM MSSM C7geff>0 Future Prospects for AFB(q2) CDF and D0, please contribute! 5ab-1 MC study of SuperB 50 ab-1 MC study of SuperB LHCb 2fb-1 ATLAS 30 fb-1 from LHC to the Universe