1 / 35

Figure/Ground Assignment in Natural Images

Figure/Ground Assignment in Natural Images. Xiaofeng Ren, Charless Fowlkes and Jitendra Malik University of California, Berkeley. Computer Vision Group. ECCV 2006 Graz. Figure/Ground Organization. Ground (shapeless). Figure (face). Figure (Goblet). Ground (Shapeless).

adamma
Download Presentation

Figure/Ground Assignment in Natural Images

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Figure/Ground AssignmentinNatural Images Xiaofeng Ren, Charless Fowlkes and Jitendra Malik University of California, Berkeley Computer Vision Group ECCV 2006 Graz

  2. Figure/Ground Organization

  3. Ground (shapeless) Figure (face) Figure (Goblet) Ground (Shapeless) Figure/Ground Organization • A contour belongs to one of the two (but not both) abutting regions. Important for the perception of shape

  4. A Classical View of Perception Object and Scene Recognition Figure/Ground Organization Grouping / Segmentation Image

  5. A Modern View Object and Scene Recognition Grouping / Segmentation Figure/Ground Organization

  6. Focus of This Work Object and Scene Recognition Grouping / Segmentation Figure/Ground Organization

  7. Overview • Introduction • Groundtruth for Figure/Ground • Local Figure/Ground Cues • Shapemes • Global Consistency • Conditional Random Field • Results and Quantitative Evaluation • Conclusion

  8. Figure/Ground in Natural Images

  9. G F Figure/Ground: Groundtruth

  10. Figure/Ground: Groundtruth

  11. Figure/Ground Dataset [Martin, Fowlkes & Malik; ECVP 2003]

  12. Cues for Figure/Ground • Local Cues • Gestalt Principles of Figure/Ground • Global Cues • Label Consistency at T-junctions [Kienker, Sejnowski, Hinton & Schumacher 1986] [Heitger & von der Heydt 1993] [Geiger, Kumaran & Parida 1996] [Saund 1999] [Yu, Lee and Kanade 2001] … …

  13. local shapes …… Shapemes: Prototypical Local Shapes collect Use Geometric Blur [Berg & Malik 2001] cluster

  14. parallelism straight line convexity line ending corner

  15. G F G F G Gestalt Principles for Figure/Ground • Convexity • Parallelism • Surroundedness • Symmetry • Lower Region • Common Fate ……

  16. L R L:93.8% L:89.6% L:66.5% L:49.8% L:11.7% L: 5.0% Shapemes for F/G Discrimination Which side is Figure? Train a logistic classifier to linearly combine the shapeme cues

  17. F F G G G F G G F G F F common uncommon Global Consistency

  18. Edge potentialsexp(ii) Junction potentialsexp(jj) where Conditional Random Fields (CRF) X={X1,X2,…,Xm} Xi{Left,Right}

  19. Building a CRF Model • What are the features? • edge features: • Shapemes • junction features: • Junction type • How to make inference? • Loopy Belief Propagation • How to learn the parameters? • Gradient Descent on Max. Likelihood X={X1,X2,…,Xm} Estimate P(Xi|)

  20. F G G G G G F F F F { (G,F),(F,G) } F G F G G F { (F,G),(F,G),(F,G) } Junction Features • One feature for each junction type { (F,G),(G,F),(F,G) } Junction potentials:

  21. G F G G G F F F = -0.611 = 0.185 F F G G F G G G F G F F = 0.428 = -0.857 Learning Junction Weights

  22. CSP > : contour direction + : convex edge - : concave edge possible junctions (constraints) Line Labeling • Probabilistic constraints instead of logical constraints • Training and testing on large datasets of natural images [Clowes 1971, Huffman 1971; Waltz 1972; Malik 1986]

  23. Experiments • Using human-marked segmentations • Using edges computed by an edge detector

  24. 50% 50% 88% 88% Results 55.6% ------ 64.8% 64.9% 72.0% 66.5% 78.3% 68.9%

  25. Using human segmentations Image Groundtruth Local Global

  26. Using edge maps computed from an edge detector Image Edge Map Local Global

  27. Summary • Human subjects label groundtruth figure/ground assignments in natural images. • Shapemes encode Gestalt structures and capture local figure/ground cues. • A conditional random field enforces global consistency at T-junctions and improves figure/ground performance. • Quantitative evaluations show that figure/ground organization has a promising solution. Object and Scene Recognition Grouping / Segmentation Figure/Ground Organization

  28. Future Work Object and Scene Recognition Grouping / Segmentation Figure/Ground Organization

  29. Future Work Object and Scene Recognition Grouping / Segmentation Figure/Ground Organization

  30. Thank You

  31. Baseline: Size/Convexity Size(A) < Size(B): A is figure; B is ground Size(A) > Size(B): B is figure; A is ground B A

  32. F F G G G G F F G F F G   Continuity in Figure/Ground If a pair of edges belong to the same foreground, they should have a smooth connection.

More Related