1 / 5

Deployment Considerations for Dual-stack Lite IETF 81 Quebec City

Deployment Considerations for Dual-stack Lite IETF 81 Quebec City. Yiu Lee, Roberta Maglione , Carl Williams, Christian Jacquenet Mohamed Boucadair. DS-lite Deployment Considerations.

abra
Download Presentation

Deployment Considerations for Dual-stack Lite IETF 81 Quebec City

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Deployment Considerations for Dual-stack LiteIETF 81 Quebec City Yiu Lee, Roberta Maglione, Carl Williams, Christian Jacquenet Mohamed Boucadair

  2. DS-lite Deployment Considerations • Based on preliminary experimental deployments, this work describes deployment and operational considerations for DSLITE. • Updated -02 version based on comments and feedback. • Added considerations for deployment of AFTR in IPv6-only networks.

  3. Working Group Adoption • The draft was presented in IETF79 (Beijing) and IETF80 (Prague). • DSLITE is chartered work and this document presents operational and deployment considerations based on real experience. • There appears to be support for WG adoption.

  4. Open Question for consideration • AFTR requires IPv4. Should the WG address AFTR in IPv6 only environments? There is an existing draft discussing this: • “draft-boucadair-softwire-dslite-v6only-00 “ • Added IPv6 only environment considerations to draft.

  5. Next Step • Working group adoption does not mean you agree with every detail of the draft, but that there is a consensus to use this draft as the basis of further working group work. • Outstanding inclusion or exclusions of considerations should not affect working group adoption. • Shall we adopt this as a WG document?

More Related