1 / 28

L.Bentz, M.Morin, C.Tourette-Turgis, M.Rébillon,

Maintaining counselling nurses for HIV patients treated by HAART at Nice University Hospital (France) : theory versus practice. L.Bentz, M.Morin, C.Tourette-Turgis, M.Rébillon, P.Dellamonica, J.G.Fuzibet, J.P. Cassuto, J.P.Moatti, C.Pradier

Leo
Download Presentation

L.Bentz, M.Morin, C.Tourette-Turgis, M.Rébillon,

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Maintaining counselling nurses for HIV patients treated by HAART at Nice University Hospital (France) : theory versus practice L.Bentz, M.Morin, C.Tourette-Turgis, M.Rébillon, P.Dellamonica, J.G.Fuzibet, J.P. Cassuto, J.P.Moatti, C.Pradier 13th international Conference on Health Promoting Hospitals (HPH) Dublin May 18-20th, 2005

  2. Background • In 1998, effectiveness of HAART on mortality • In 1999 at Nice University Hospital, 2500 HIV infected patients followed yearly in 3 main departments

  3. New problems concerning treatment adherence • Idea of an • intervention-research program, including counselling by professionals

  4. Background (2) Principles of HIV counselling aiming at treatment adherence • An operational definition of adherence addressing the 4 components affecting adherence • A patient-centred intervention • Empathic approach based on active listening as well as acceptance of diversity of life styles • Active intervention

  5. MOTHIV model : concept and strategies • Voluntary nurses • An intensive training for nurses, follow up and supervision. • A structured and brief counselling intervention (4 x 45 mn sessions) • Nurse’s tools : interview script and adherenceassessment sheet

  6. MOTHIV : tool samples Intervention script N°1

  7. Tool samples Adherence assesment sheet

  8. Background (3) • The program was launched in June 1999 • On-going from 1999 to 2005 • Assessment of impact • Assessment of activity

  9. Results Randomized study 310 patients offered participation 246 patients included (79%) M0 intervention group (IG) n=124 control group (CG) n=122 1 death 1 death M6 123 patients (IG) 121 patients (CG) 8 lost to follow-up 2 deaths 7 lost to follow-up 2 deaths M24 113 patients (IG) 112 patients (CG)

  10. Results At M0 comparable patients in IG and CG : • Age • Gender • Mode of transmission • Education level • CDC stage • VL / CD4 • HAART • Average duration of HAART • % of treatment change

  11. Results Assessment M0/M6 • Positive impact of counselling consultations on: adherence and VL at 6 months Pradier, Bentz et al, HIV Clinical Trials, 2003, 4, 121-131

  12. Results Assessment M0/M24

  13. Results Assessment M0/M24 Comparison of the average differences in VL (M0/M24) Deltas VL (log cp/ml) NS 0,12 -0,07 NS -0,12 -0,12 NS NS -0,22 -0,22 p=0,013 p=0,027 -0,36 p=0,002 -0,47 p<0,001 IG CG M6 M18 M24 M12

  14. Results Medical consultations Overall population

  15. Results Qualitative survey of patient satisfaction with counselling consultations : CG (n=9) : • Ambiguity between progress and constraints of new treatments • Deep questioning about adherence IG GI (n=9) : • Satisfaction with the information provided and the listening • Feeling of ability to handle the treatment • Development of a spirit of critical participation in treatment follow-up • The consultation appears as a social support

  16. Results: counselling nurses’ activity 1999-2004 (1)

  17. Results: counselling nurses’ activity 1999-2004 (2) 2 consultations/year/patient

  18. Discussion (1) National factors encouraging this activity • Political support for treatment education of chronic diseases in general (Law 2004-806 relative to Public Health Policy) • Recent development of a « counselling culture » in France • Increase in counselling activities addressing HIV-infected patients, in spite of assessment gaps

  19. http://www.counselingvih.org A Counselling, Health, Development & « Comment Dire » Project

  20. Discussion (2) : Local factors in favour of this activity • Involvement of Nice University Hospital management to encourage health promotion and patient education activities. • Elaboration of a permanent program with on-going assessments by the Public Health Department • High degree of motivation on the nurses’part • Participation of physicians .

  21. Discussion (3) : Positive assessment results for the patients • Positive impact on long-term viral load • Fewer medical consultations • Patients participate in a more active way in the managementof theirtreatment .

  22. Discussion (4)Local difficulties • 2 of the 3 care units have diversified their recruitment in terms of pathology • Change in patient recruitment profile • HIV activity increasingly concentrated in a single care unit and nurse • Nurses ’ availability for counselling activities has decreased due to : • Reduced number of nurses available for patient education in favour of technical care • Recognition of nurses ’ skills : involvement in teaching and scientific communication tasks

  23. Discussion (5) National difficulties No economic evaluation of counselling activity : • Time consuming activity • Need of an identification system, systematic data collection and processing of activity • Implementation of payment system based on diagnosis-related groups in French hospitals (2004) : no price setting from Health Ministry for educational activities

  24. Conclusion • The program confirms its permanence and benefit for patients • A contextual fragility in spite of institutional involvement • Need for economic evaluation

  25. Acknowledgments • To nurses in charge of counselling interventions G. Valentini, M. Borghi, P. Asplanato • To hospital care units :Pr P. Dellamonica, J. Durant, V. Mondain, I. Perbost, P. Pugliese,V. Rahelinirina, C.Rascle, Pr J.G. Fuzibet, F.Sanderson P. Heudier, E. Rosenthal, M. Pietri, Pr JP Cassuto, H. Vinti, C. Ceppi, J. Massiera, M.Chavaillon • To data managers:N. Oran, JN Mazza, S. Déric • To « How to say » : C.Tourette-Turgis, M. Rébillon • To the Health Direction :M. Rubolini, M. Mazard • To INSERM U 379 (JP Moatti, B. Spire, M. Souville) and to the laboratory of social psychology in Provence (M. Morin, J. Scherer) • To P. Touboul and B. Dunais, MD, for their availability

  26. Results Assessment M0/M24

More Related