ecosite decision support system for sustainable forest management in manitoba n.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Ecosite Decision Support System for Sustainable Forest Management in Manitoba PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Ecosite Decision Support System for Sustainable Forest Management in Manitoba

Ecosite Decision Support System for Sustainable Forest Management in Manitoba

604 Views Download Presentation
Download Presentation

Ecosite Decision Support System for Sustainable Forest Management in Manitoba

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

  1. Ecosite Decision Support System for Sustainable Forest Management in Manitoba Project Overview

  2. Partnership Approach • Maximizes the opportunity to share available ideas, information, existing data and costs (financial support) • Provides a forum for knowledge transfer among participants and interested stakeholders • Promotes the use of the system across an array of users • Ensures that the benefits of the project are immediately available

  3. University of Manitoba Tembec - Pine Falls Tolko Manitoba LP Canada Inc. GeoSpatial International ManitobaModel Forest Manitoba Conservation Manitoba Hydro Ducks Unlimited Canada Contributing Partners

  4. National Financial Awards • Canadian Forest Service (CFS) • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) • Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC)

  5. Background • A new approach for an SFM Decision Support System (DSS): • to benefit a diverse array of users of forest resource information • DSS based upon a land classification at a level useful for management, using: • Canada Committee on Ecological Land Classification (CCELC) created in 1976 • Forest Ecosystem Classification (FEC) for Manitoba developed in 1995 • An Ecosite-level classification unit required

  6. What is an Ecosite? • Unit Established by the Canada Committee on Ecological Land Classification • spatial unit between lower order ecoelements and the ecosection level • mappable at scales of 1:10,000 to 1:20,000 with areas of 10-1,000 ha • relevant to resource use decision making (habitat, succession, land use, forestry, etc.) • the fundamental unit for the Manitoba DSS • the level at which biodiversity and recreational associated values will be incorporated

  7. CCELC Hierarchy

  8. Higher Order Land Units: Ecozones

  9. Project Goals • Develop a methodology for consistent classification of ecosites and associated forestry/non-forestry values • Build upon existing lower-order ecoelements • e.g. aerial photo interpretation - stand delineation/typing, PHA. • Produce a common communication tool • e.g. resource managers, users and stakeholders • Assist in forest resource management decision-making processes

  10. Ecosite Classification for Manitoba • Project to utilize a mapping approach: • refine already available V- and S- Type ecoelements in the Manitoba FEC • formulate a consistent classification key and ecosite descriptions • Ecosites are based upon abiotic features that generally remain stable and biotic associations • Includes terrestrial and aquatic systems

  11. Ecosite Development Process • Preliminary Manitoba ecosite key and descriptions (completed 2001) • review of existing ecosites and keys from similar jurisdictions • integration of Manitoba FEC V & S Types • draft preliminary key for field testing and revision for Manitoba • 40 preliminary ecosites • refining ecosite-ecoelement relationship

  12. Ecosite Development: Ecosite Key

  13. Ecosite-Ecoelement Relationships

  14. Ecosite Development: Technical Review • Review preliminary ecosites key and descriptions (winter 2001) • features to delineate ecosite polygons • associations of ecoelements • survey methodology • integrate with partners • e.g. Manitoba Forest Lands Inventory Technical Advisory Committee (FLITAC) • Ducks Unlimited (for wetlands)

  15. Field Trial & Data Collection (2002-2003) • Sample site locations determined in conjunction with partners • Utilize new and existing data including already typed polygons, PHA and other data as available • incorporate information from Duck Mountain pilot project • Work with industry partners to field test ecosite keys

  16. Post-field Work • Utilize information from on-ground data collection and test trials of the keys • refinement of the ecosites key • including additions to FEC V & S - Types • ecosite description fact sheets including associated ecological values • Workshops to review progress and ensure data transferability • Development of DSS in 2003 • incorporate user needs and associated values

  17. Ecosite DSS for Manitoba: Incorporating Biodiversity Values

  18. Biodiversity: Goals and Objectives • Objective is to incorporate biodiversity values into our DSS and the Ecological Land Classification of Manitoba • considers the scaling properties of biodiversity from the ecoelement to landscape scale • focuses on habitat structural elements • utilizes a mapping approach to identify areas of high diversity

  19. Measuring Diversity For DSS • The Ecosite sampling and mapping methodology previously discussed is compatible with assessing diversity • Diversity has strong scaling properties from the ecoelement to landscape scale

  20. Diversity hierarchy • Landscape • Abiotic and Biotic relations • Number of community types • Spatial arrangement • Community • Interactions among populations • Species composition • Guilds • Population • Interactions of individuals with habitat • Species viability • Genetics (Subspecies)

  21. Diversity as an Associated Value • Landscapes are the ‘unit’ on which we manage forest biodiversity • we incorporate diversity into the DSS by building links between levels of the hierarchy: • ecoelement based diversity principles to landscape-level • ecoelement measures of habitat structure to landscape pattern • Measures of habitat structure and spatial pattern included in DSS at Ecosite scale

  22. Scaling Diversity to the Ecosite-level • Diversity from measuring forest ecosite pattern on the landscape: • from Manitoba FRI, remotely sensed imagery and ecosite polygon maps (e.g. DU) • assesses diversity among clusters of ecosites • Examine habitat structure along toposequences: • assesses habitat diversity as changes in forest structure within the ecosites (e.g. L-P) • aerial survey with paraglider (scaling-up) • Approach emphasize habitat diversity

  23. Mapping Ecosite ‘Polygon’ Diversity

  24. DN X-Coordinate Position on Landscape Digital Number (DN) Grey Scale Mapping Ecosite Habitat Structure: Toposequences

  25. Advantage of Habitat Structure/Scaling Approaches • Complete species and RTE lists, genetic studies etc. are ideal, but: • cost prohibitive • requires intensive sampling over entire season • species are often missed (RTE) or some are never counted (insects, mosses, etc.) • time scale, structure and pattern on the landscape often not considered • Habitat approach provides measures compatible with forest management • spatially explicit, mappable, can be examined over time

  26. Ecosite DSS for Manitoba: Incorporating Recreation Values Recreation Habitat Suitability Index

  27. Context • Forest recreation takes a variety of forms with each requiring specific environmental conditions • Therefore individual forest recreation types can be seen as “species” with distinct habitat requirements • To date most forest recreation research has attempted to ascribe economic value • We need to identify preferred habitat requirements for recreation “species”

  28. Goals and Objectives • To integrate recreational values into Ecosite DSS for sustainable forest management in Manitoba • inventory of outdoor recreation activities and environments • develop a recreation atlas for the province • identify feasibility of using recreation habitat suitability indices in forest planning and management

  29. Methodology Phase 2 Phase 1 Phase 3 Prior knowledge GIS Layer Expert Interviews Spatial Model Species-environment relationship GIS Layer Grey Literature Species distribution map Analysis of species-environment relationship GIS Layer Academic Literature Species Observations

  30. Coarse and Fine Filter Approach

  31. Phase 1 Overview • Expert interview - Delphi approach • Site inventory • Literature/media review • Determine landscape criteria to model recreation habitat suitability indices

  32. Preliminary Grey Literature Inventory • Forest recreation represents a diverse array of activities Angling 60 41 Hunting 36 Wildlife Viewing Snowmobiling 35 Canoeing 33 X-country skiing 29 27 Hiking 23 Camping Swimming 23 Power Boating 18 # of References

  33. Interview Step Methodology • Will approximate a snowball sampling technique • Sampling concludes when significant repetition occurs • Experts will provide: • diverse perspectives • data on landscape requirements • specific activities and intensities

  34. Phase 2 Overview • Based on phase 1 preliminary sites identified • document what people do and where • Link activity with ecoelements • creates the potential for future ecosite identification • Field trial for specific recreation types • RHSI (recreation habitat suitability index)

  35. Phase 3 Overview • Forest recreation atlas/RHSI at ecosite level as part of DSS (2003) • forest recreation activities in Manitoba are diverse • an atlas will assist in supporting SFM • RHSI’s likely to have complex distribution

  36. Ecosite Decision Support System for Sustainable Forest Management in Manitoba Concluding Remarks

  37. Summary • Foundation ecological classification established • refinement continuing • Incorporation of associated non-timber values for biodiversity and recreation • ongoing iterative process • Closely linked to sustainable forest planning and management • cooperative partnerships established • developing a DSS integrating a range of forest values for ease of application by the forest industry