slide1 n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Cooperative Agreement for Pedestrian Enforcement Programs Pro Bike/Pro Walk Conference Madison, Wisconsin September 6, 2 PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Cooperative Agreement for Pedestrian Enforcement Programs Pro Bike/Pro Walk Conference Madison, Wisconsin September 6, 2

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 21

Cooperative Agreement for Pedestrian Enforcement Programs Pro Bike/Pro Walk Conference Madison, Wisconsin September 6, 2 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 209 Views
  • Uploaded on

Cooperative Agreement for Pedestrian Enforcement Programs Pro Bike/Pro Walk Conference Madison, Wisconsin September 6, 2006. Sergeant David A. Black University of Massachusetts

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

Cooperative Agreement for Pedestrian Enforcement Programs Pro Bike/Pro Walk Conference Madison, Wisconsin September 6, 2


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
slide1

Cooperative Agreement for Pedestrian Enforcement ProgramsPro Bike/Pro Walk ConferenceMadison, WisconsinSeptember 6, 2006

Sergeant David A. Black

University of Massachusetts

Police Department

dblack@admin.umass.edu http://www.umass.edu/umpd

(413) 545-2121

project management
Project Management
  • University of Massachusetts Police Department
  • The University of Massachusetts Traffic Safety Research Program (UMassSAFE)
  • The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
slide4
The University of Massachusetts Traffic Safety Research Program(UMassSAFE)  is a multidisciplinary traffic safety research programhoused in the University of Massachusetts Transportation Center at the University of Massachusetts Amherst.
  • At UMassSAFE, we seek to reduce the frequency and severity of crashes through the rigorous examination of safety-related data – both traditional and nontraditional - to better understand crashes, driverbehavior, and related factors.
national highway traffic safety administration
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
  • Our mission:

Save lives, prevent injuries, reduce vehicle-related crashes

university of massachusetts pedestrian problem
University of Massachusetts Pedestrian Problem
  • One pedestrian injury every four months of academic year
  • 2 recent fatal
  • 2 recent near fatal
  • Many “near misses”
university of massachusetts demonstration project plan
University of Massachusetts Demonstration Project Plan

4 E’s of Pedestrian Safety

  • Education,
  • Enforcement,
  • Engineering and
  • Evaluation
university of massachusetts police department focus area
University of Massachusetts Police Department Focus Area
  • Education (10/05) and Enforcement (11/05)

Decoy Program

  • Judicial Review

Meet with Clerk Magistrates and Judges for input on violation

  • Creation of Training model for Colleges and Universities
umpd funding
OT funding for Education and Enforcement Patrol

Equipment

Printing: Flyers, Posters and Bus Cards

UMPD Funding
masssafe focus areas
MassSAFE Focus Areas
  • Data Collection/Analysis
  • Engineering Improvements
  • Evaluation Approaches
    • Roadway Inventory
    • Crash Data
    • Citation Data
    • Observations
    • Impaired Pedestrian Observations
massachusetts pedestrian fatalities and serious injuries 2004
Massachusetts Pedestrian Fatalities and Serious Injuries, 2004
  • 82 pedestrian fatalities
  • 17% of MA traffic fatalities
  • 268 non fatal incapacitating injuries
program goals
Program Goals
  • Increase citations for motorist violations of crosswalk laws by 15% (Goal met)
  • Increase motorists and pedestrians complying with laws by 15% (Goal met)
  • Implement policy for violators of pedestrian crosswalk violations (Not yet)
university of massachusetts
University of Massachusetts

The Amherst campus:

  • has a residential population of 13,000 students
  • A total of over 24,000 students
  • A daytime high of over 30,000 people
umass amherst population
UMass Amherst Population
  • High use of walking/bicycling/skate-boards as transportation means
  • Concentrated population with high alcohol use
  • Well-suited for addressing pedestrian safety
university of massachusetts pedestrian problem1
Walking campus

High pedestrian/ vehicle interaction

14,000 vehicles registered to park

Visitors to large audience venues

Parking on perimeter, buildings in center

University of Massachusetts Pedestrian Problem
recent pedestrian issues
Recent Pedestrian Issues
  • Fall 2005: Education and Enforcement Period
  • Spring 2006
    • 6 pedestrian/vehicular accidents on campus in 3 month period
    • A total of 11 pedestrians injured
motorist violations
M.G.L. Chapter 89 Section 11

Motorists must yield to pedestrians in a crosswalk

Passing a vehicle stopped for a pedestrian in the roadway

$200 fine

MGL Chapter 75 Section 32A

UMass Article 4 Section 24

Motorists must yield to pedestrians in a crosswalk

$35 fine

Motorist Violations
pedestrian violation
Pedestrian Violation

MGL Chapter 90 Section 18A

Pedestrians, use of ways; rules and regulations; violations; notice

  • 1st, 2nd and 3rd violations-$1.00
  • 4th and subsequent violations-$2.00

UMass Article and Section

  • Not applicable
achieving program goals
Achieving Program Goals
  • Program will highlight:
    • Need for data
    • Multi-disciplinary approach
    • Introduce enforcement concepts outlined in “Law Enforcement Pedestrian Safety”
program results
Program Results
  • The initial results are encouraging with increases in the percentage of yielding vehicles at both experimental locations for both the before-during and before-after comparisons.  
  • By comparison, the control locations had mixed results with an overall decrease in the percentage of yielding vehicles.
  • Full evaluation is still underway.