jcids overview 10 may 2005 l.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
JCIDS Overview 10 May 2005 PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
JCIDS Overview 10 May 2005

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 17

JCIDS Overview 10 May 2005 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 439 Views
  • Uploaded on

Joint Capabilities Integration & Development System JCIDS Overview 10 May 2005 Joint Staff / J-8 Capabilities and Acquisition Division Previous Requirements and Acquisition Process As a rule, CONOPs and requirements were Service-focused Analysis was primarily threat-based

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'JCIDS Overview 10 May 2005' - Albert_Lan


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
jcids overview 10 may 2005

Joint Capabilities Integration & Development System

JCIDSOverview10 May 2005

Joint Staff / J-8

Capabilities and Acquisition Division

slide2

Previous Requirements and Acquisition Process

  • As a rule, CONOPs and requirements were Service-focused
  • Analysis was primarily threat-based
  • Process lacked a construct for Joint analysis “up-front”
  • Systems integration tended to be forced in at end game
  • Duplication existed, particularly in smaller programs
  • Spiral acquisition was not well institutionalized
  • Joint warfighting needs were not prioritized
capability based methodology
Capability Based Methodology

Requirements Generation System (RGS)- ~30 years of experiences

Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS)- 1 year old

Strategic Direction

Partially Interoperable Capabilities

Joint Warfighting Concept Development

Late Integration

Joint Experimentation, Assessment & Analysis,Validation, Selection of Solutions

Services Build Systems

Service Experimentation, Assessment & Analysis,Validation, Selection of Solutions

Services, COCOMs

Joint Capabilities

Service Unique Strategic Visions and Requirements

jroc impact using jcids
Desired Attributes of DOD Decision Process

Responsive

Flat

Involve leaders “when it counts”

Agree on facts

New 3170.01D

Top down

Born “Joint”

Tees up issues with wider input earlier in the process

JROC Impact using JCIDS

Personal time devoted to the process by leadership

Ability to influence a business process

(Avoid)

(Embrace)

Time

Action Agent:

Functional Capabilities Boards

jcids evolution concepts to capabilities

Initial

Capabilities

Document

Functional

Solutions

Analysis

Functional

Solutions

Analysis

Functional

Solutions

Analysis

Functional

Solutions

Analysis

JCIDS Evolution – Concepts to Capabilities

First order assessment using operational tasks and force elements

Joint Concepts and MSFD scenarios

Strategic Guidance

Joint

Operations

Concepts

DPS

DPS

Joint Operating

Concepts

DPS

DPS

Joint Functional Concepts

DPS

Joint Integrating Concepts

SecDef

Joint Chiefs of Staff

Joint Requirements Oversight Council

Provide DOTMLPF Solutions

Operational Modeling to identify gaps and excesses

Capability Roadmap &

Resource Strategy

Sys 1

Sys 1

Sys 3

Sys 3

Sys 2

Sys 2

New Sys

New Sys

Block

Block

SLEP

SLEP

End of Svc Life

End of Svc Life

FOC

FOC

Upgrade

Upgrade

capability

capability

Campaign

Engagement

Mission

2010

2010

2008

2008

2006

2006

2004

2004

2014

2014

2012

2012

Training

Training

Field New

Field New

Change

Change

Organization

Organization

Secretary of Defense

Services

Joint Requirements Oversight Council

the jroc capability based assessment process

Army

Navy

USMC

FCBs

Air Force

COCOMs

OSD (AT&L)

DIA

OSD (PA&E)

OSD (NII)

The JROC Capability-Based Assessment Process

Month 8

Month 10

Month 9

Month 7

Month 11

Month 6

Month 1

Month 4

Month 2

Month 3

Month 5

Joint Integrating

Concept Development &

Mission Analysis

Capabilities-Based Assessment

  • FSA
    • Determine initial Non-materiel & Materiel Alternatives
    • Recommend a prioritized capability approach to meet the need, including initial TRL, sustainability, supportability, schedule of delivery, and affordability assessments
    • Assess operational risk of each approach
    • Consider S&T Initiatives
    • ID Experimentation needs
  • FAA
    • Capabilities
    • Tasks
    • Attributes
    • Metrics
  • FNA
    • Gaps
    • Shortfalls
    • Redundancies
    • Risk Areas

Campaign-level Analysis

Resourcing &

TOR

Development

Experimentation Inputs/Recs

  • Concept Development
  • Tasks
  • Capabilities
    • Attributes
    • Metrics
  • Concurrent Development of DPS-based vignette
  • Solutions
  • Material
  • Non-Material

SPONSOR

COCOM

or

Service

slide7

DOD End-to-EndCapabilities, Acquisition, and Test Process

Technology Development

System Development

Technology Development

System Development

Production

CPD

CPD

Production

CDD

CDD

DAB Capability Area Reviews (CARs)

  • Refined concept
  • Analysis of Alternatives
  • Technology Development Strategy
  • SoS System Engineering
  • Affordable military-useful increment
  • Technology demonstrated
  • Initial KPPs
  • SEP
  • Strategic Planning Guidance
  • Defense Planning Scenarios
  • Family of Concepts
  • Transforma-tion
  • Revise KPPs
  • Detailed design
  • System integration
  • DT&E
  • LRIP
  • IOT&E

Capabilities Based Assessment

  • LRIP
  • FOT&E
  • Non-materiel solutions
  • Materiel solutions
  • S+T initiatives
  • Experimentation
  • Capabilities
  • Tasks
  • Attributes
  • Metrics
  • Gaps
  • Shortfalls
  • Redundancies
  • Risk areas

Concept

Decision

MS “A”

MS “B”

MS “C”

activity

Functional Area Analysis

*Functional Needs Analysis

*Functional Solutions Analysis

Select a Joint

Integrating Concept

Develop Concept

Analysis of Alternatives

Technology Development

System Development

ICD

Production

CPD

CDD

Capability Based Assessment

Evolutionary or Spiral

Development

OSD (AT&L)- led Capability Roadmaps

Army

Navy

USMC

FCB

OSD/JCS

COCOMs

Air Force

Services

COCOM

OSD (AT&L)

DIA

OSD (NII)

OSD (PA&E)

oversight

SecDef

OSD (AT&L, PA&E), Services and OSD (DOT&E) -- Joint Staff (JROC)

Joint Chiefs of Staff & Joint Requirements Oversight Council

Joint Staff / OSD

Joint Staff (OSD)

Capabilities Definition

Acquisition and Test

Concept Refinement

Policy

*“as is” Roadmaps

new jcids documents
New JCIDS Documents
  • Joint Capabilities Document (JCD)
    • Identifies capability gaps or other deficiencies
    • Supports development of one or more ICDs
    • Developed primarily by COCOMs and FCBs
    • Can be developed by a sponsor under certain conditions
    • Updated as required
  • Joint DOTMLPF Change Recommendation (DCR)
    • Identifies an approach to filling a capability gap through non-materiel changes
    • Developed primarily by COCOMs
    • Formerly described in CJCSI 3180.01
joint capabilities document jcd
Joint Capabilities Document (JCD)

Purpose of the JCD:

  • Describes capability gaps as determined by the functional area and needs analyses
  • Identifies the relative importance/priority of the gaps
    • Highlights capability gaps that are important enough to justify pursuing a solution
    • Identifies gaps where risk may be taken`

When is a JCD required?

  • COCOM generates based on emerging/changing missions or identified capability gaps
  • FCBs generate based on the results of a JIC
  • Sponsors may generate when pre-coordinated with COCOMs and FCBs
slide10

JCIDS Gatekeeper

  • Perform an initial review of all JCIDS proposals
    • Support provided by JFCOM, J6, J7, J8, FCB WGs
  • The Gatekeeper will determine:
    • Joint Potential Designator
      • JROC Interest
      • Joint Integration
      • Independent
    • Lead and supporting Functional Capabilities Boards
  • Formal Staffing begins after Gatekeeper decisions
chartered fcbs
Chartered FCBs

FCBs:

* Milestone Decision Authority Co-chairs

* Bring all stakeholders together for common review and issue resolution

* Prioritize/assess capability gaps and proposals

JROC:

* Charters FCBs

* Directs FCB efforts

* Identifies the FCB lead

Command

& Control

Focused

Logistics

Force

Management

Battlespace

Awareness

Maj Gen Simpson

JFCOM J-8

RDML Harnitchek

JS J-4

Ms Disbrow

(SES)

JS J-8

Brig Gen Dettmer

JS J-2

Force

Application

Joint

Training

Force

Protection

Net-Centric

RADM Brown

JS J-6

Maj Gen Scott

JS J-8

Maj Gen Catton

JS J-7

Tri-chair

Dr. Fridling

(SES)

JS J-8

slide12

Functional Capabilities Board

Responsibilities:

  • Ensure new capabilities are conceived and developed in joint warfighting context
  • Ensure JCIDS proposals are consistent with integrated joint force
  • Organize, analyze & prioritize capabilities proposals
  • Oversee development and update of Functional Concept(s)
  • Ensure integrated architectures reflect the functional area
  • Leverage full resources of the Department
oversight body comparison
Services

DIA Representative (Intelligence Supportability)

Services

Combatant Commanders

USD (AT&L)

USD (I)

USecAF (Space)

ASD NII/ DOD CIO

USD (C)

D, PA&E

DIA Representative (Intelligence Supportability)

Mission Requirements Board

Oversight Body Comparison

Functional Capabilities Board (FCB)

Joint Requirements Panel

(JRP)

Joint Requirements

Board (JRB)

Joint Capabilities

Board (JCB)

Joint Requirements

Oversight Council (JROC)

Joint Requirements

Oversight Council (JROC)

slide14

JROC Interest

All ACAT 1/1A programs and programs

designated as JROC Interest

Sponsor

Validates &

Approves

JCIDS Staffing/Approval Process

O-6

&

Flag

Staffing

Certification

Staffing

Joint Integration

ACAT 11 ands below that need

interoperability/intel/munitions certification

GateKeeper

JCIDS

Documents

Independent

No joint force affect or need for certification

Appropriate MDA

Co-Chairs FCB

Functional Capability Boards

Services

CoCom Reps

USD (AT&L)

USD (I)

USecAF (Space)

ASD NII/ DOD CIO

D, PA&E

DIA Rep (Intel Supportability)

Mission Review Board Exec Sec’y

Other DoD Agencies as necessary

Joint Capabilities Board

& JROC

JROC Interest

conclusions on jcids
Conclusions on JCIDS
  • Provides an enhanced methodology to identify and describe capabilities gaps and redundancies
  • Helps to prioritize capability proposals
  • Facilitates broad review of capability proposals independent of ACAT (Acquisition Category)
  • Engages the acquisition community early
  • Improves the identification of non-materiel alternatives
  • Improves collaboration with other departments and agencies
jcids documents
JCIDS Documents
  • Initial Capabilities Document (ICD)
    • Identifies a capability gap or other deficiency
    • Describes evaluation of DOTMLPF approaches
    • Supports AoA, Concept Refinement and Milestone A
    • Not normally updated once approved
  • Capability Development Document (CDD)
    • Identifies operational performance attributes of proposed system
    • System specific, applies to single increment (in an evolutionary program)
    • Results from Technology Development and supports Milestone B
    • Updated or rewritten for subsequent increments
  • Capability Production Document (CPD)
    • Identifies production attributes for a single increment of a program
    • Prepared during System Development and Demonstration
    • Rewritten for each increment in a evolutionary program