1 / 6

The PH/ESE µTCA evaluation project Progress report

The PH/ESE µTCA evaluation project Progress report. Markus Joos in collaboration with Vincent Bobillier, Stefan Haas, Francois Vasey and Paschalis Vichoudis. Project definition. Evaluate µTCA for it suitability as a platform for future modular electronics for HEP experiments. Tasks:

Download Presentation

The PH/ESE µTCA evaluation project Progress report

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The PH/ESE µTCA evaluation projectProgress report Markus Joos in collaboration with Vincent Bobillier, Stefan Haas, Francois Vasey and Paschalis Vichoudis

  2. Project definition Evaluate µTCA for it suitability as a platform for future modular electronics for HEP experiments • Tasks: • Technical evaluation of components for µTCA and MTCA.4 systems • Development of tools (H/W and S/W) for the testing of commercial components • Conduct market surveys • Report results to the xTCA IG • Build up support for components of common interest • Project duration: • February 2011 – mid 2012 • Discussion of continuation in early 2012 Project description: https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/XTCA/PHESExTCAEvaluationProject/mTCAforHEP_V1_6.pdf

  3. Equipment purchased 2 5 3 6 4 1

  4. Equipment developed MMC test AMC MMC mezzanine (based on design from CPPM) AMC load board RTM load board

  5. Results • For the detailed report see: https://espace.cern.ch/ph-dep-ESE-BE-uTCAEvaluationProject/Shared%20Documents/xTCA%20summary.docx • Many (mostly minor) interoperability problems encountered • Components providing the same function (e.g. shelf or MCH) can have very different features and user interfaces (S/W) • µTCA seems to be growing rapidly • Large choice of shelves, MCHs, processors, FPGA/FMC AMCs • Also some digitizers available now • MTCA.4 received well by OEMs • Many customizations • Special signal routing on backplanes • Backplanes with integrated MCH functionality • Many options (cooling, PSUs, data transfer protocols) Trends • CMS & BE/CO: µTCA • ATLAS & LHCb: ATCA

  6. Proposal for the next phase • Complete the tasks of the first phase (MMC S/W, load board H/W and S/W) • Continue the market surveys and maintain contacts with (potential) users via e.g. the xTCA IG • Continue and expand the project with these objectives: • Pay equal attention to µTCA and ATCA • Discuss collaboration with LHCb on ATCA evaluation • Also invite ATLAS to participate • Discuss collaboration with BE/CO on µTCA evaluation • Keep contacts with CMS • Focus efforts of PH/ESE on infrastructure components • Shelves and Power supplies (with focus on electrical and cooling performance) • µTCA MCH modules (and processor AMCs) • Propose procedures for the acceptance testing of (commercial) xTCA components A decision to move forward with this strategy would imply the creation of a new common project loaded with appropriate resources (one or two students and sufficient funding to acquire equipment to be evaluated)

More Related