Transportation economics and project evaluation
1 / 83

Transportation Economics and Project Evaluation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on

Transportation Economics and Project Evaluation. Evaluation process safety in evaluation process and intro to micro economics. Objectives of project evaluation. An objective and consistent method for the making of investment decisions Which alternative design for a project should we select?

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Transportation Economics and Project Evaluation' - vitalis-kiril

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Transportation economics and project evaluation

Transportation Economics and Project Evaluation

Evaluation process safety in evaluation process and intro to micro economics

Objectives of project evaluation
Objectives of project evaluation

  • An objective and consistent method for the making of investment decisions

    • Which alternative design for a project should we select?

    • Which competing alternative approach should we invest in?

    • Which project or projects should we invest in?

    • What category of projects would it be most productive to invest in?

      • E.G., streets or water distribution

Exception methodology
Exception Methodology

  • Manage by exception

    • Invest what you have always invested unless an exception arises

  • Example

    • City capital improvement budget – invest at the same level for every city service with a small increase for inflation.

    • Budget for contingencies where system exhibits a chronic problem (e.g. excessive congestion)

Pros and cons of exception method
Pros and Cons of Exception Method

  • Pros

    • Easily understood by decision makers

    • Requires minimal amount of decisions support systems

  • Cons

    • No basis for making efficient decisions

    • No basis for making trade-offs between categories

    • Perpetuates past misallocation of resources

Traditional approach popular
Traditional approach (popular)

  • Performance measurement

    • Manage the performance of existing system

      • Pavement roughness

      • Delay encountered while traveling in system

      • Travel speed

      • Travel times

      • Etc.

    • Establish minimum levels of performance

    • Invest in projects which provide the maximum improvement in performance for dollars spent.

Pros and cons of traditional approach
Pros and Cons of Traditional Approach

  • Pros

    • Manages to measurable criteria

    • Builds on good management practice

    • Supportable to public and decision makers

  • Cons

    • Supports past legacies decisions

    • Difficult to make comparisons between investment categories

    • Supports past misallocations of resources

Economic evaluation big idea
Economic Evaluation (big idea)

  • Levels of decisions

    • Operating and maintenance budget decisions

      • What level of performance

  • Project design level decisions

    • Design decisions regarding a project

    • User benefits of competing designs are assumed equal

  • Project selection decision

    • Give a number of alternatives for a project which one should be selected.

    • Mutually exclusive options

  • Network decisions

    • Given a number of projects, which one should be invested in and when

    • Non-mutually exclusive options

  • Program allocation decisions

    • Which category of investment should we invest in?

    • Safety improvements or congestion reduction?

  • Operating budgeting decisions
    Operating budgeting decisions

    • Operating allocation – Budget to Meet performance identified in selection decision

    • Project selection process assumes operating costs allocation when the selection is made

    Example project selection


    Example project selection

    Project 1


    Performance level

    Maintenance Treatment

    Project 2

    Performance level

    Each assumes its ongoing cost of maintenance

    Project design selection criteria
    Project Design Selection Criteria

    • Select project designs which

      • Minimizes Life Cycle Costs

        • Assumes that all design alternatives provides similar user benefits

      • Meets budget requirements

      • Able to achieve minimum design standards

    Project selection decision
    Project Selection Decision

    • Selects project from feasible alternatives

    • Projects are mutually exclusive

      • Example – Two different alignments

    • Benefit and costs streams of project alternative vary

    • Comparison methodologies

      • Benefit to cost ratio

      • Minimum present worth

      • Maximum internal rate of return

    • Comparison of incremental benefits and costs

    Network decision making
    Network Decision Making

    • Planning level decision making

      • Should we invest in reconstructing the freeway in Council Bluffs, Davenport, four-laning U.S. 30, etc.

    • Non-mutually exclusive decisions

    • Compare the benefits and costs of one project to another

    • Decision making criteria

      • Select project with greatest benefit to costs ratio

      • Continue to select project until budget is exhausted or there are not more cost beneficial projects.

    Program allocation decisions
    Program Allocation Decisions

    • There will always be projects where the benefits exceed the costs so which category of activity should we invest?

      • Example – should we be investing more in education and less in transportation services?

      • Example – should we be investing more in winter maintenance and less in bridge maintenance?

    Program allocation decision
    Program allocation decision

    • Trade-offs between categories are very difficult

    • Rarely done based on economic information

    • Political and equity concerns conflict with pure economic rational (deep thought)

    Benefit cost analysis
    Benefit – Cost analysis

    • Since transportation benefits are reduced cost, costs and benefits often get confused.

    • Costs are associated with the facility

      • Capital costs

        • Construction costs

        • Right-of-way costs

        • Vehicle cost (if they are owned by the operator)

      • Maintenance costs

      • Facility operation

    Benefit costs analysis
    Benefit-Costs analysis

    • Reduced costs that are associated with benefits are related to the users

      • Travel time costs

        • Total hours and cost of system travel

        • Travel time reliability

      • Vehicle operating costs

        • Fuel

        • Oil

        • Insurance

        • Maintenance

        • Depreciation (vehicle ownership costs)

        • Tires

      • Crash costs

    Estimates of user cost savings
    Estimates of User Cost Savings

    • Travel time reductions

      • Demand models

      • Travel time reliability – user benefits are difficult to measure

    • Vehicle costs

      • Measure through historical data

    • Value of reduced deaths and injuries

      • Technical costs are easy to measure

      • Human loss is difficult to measure

    What is a human life worth
    What is a human life worth

    • Industry must make trade-offs between safer cars and profits

    • Government must make trade-off between safer roads and expenditures on highways

    • Users make trade-offs between the likelihood of dying and travel convenience

      • How many of you would like to drive at 5 mph?

    Example 1 of calculation
    Example 1 of Calculation

    • Ford Pinto Gas Tank Guard case

      Ford calculations

      Ford costs

      Guard costs $11 per guard

      Project run of pinto – 12.5 million

      Total retrofit cost $135,000,000

      User cost

      44 excess fatalities

      530 excess injuries

      7,500 excess PDOs

    Example 1 continued
    Example 1 continued

    Societal cost of excess fatalities and injuries

    Fatal $200,000 (NHTSA and Safety Council average)

    Injury accident $67,000 (very high)

    PDO $700

    Total societal costs = $49,500,000

    B/C = 2.8 in favor of not doing the retrofit

    Example 1
    Example 1

    • Was Ford right or wrong?

    • Why?

    Example 2 right turn on red
    Example 2 Right Turn on Red

    Estimated national savings

    User savings – 1.4 gallons/veh/year

    - 10 seconds/driver/day

    User costs - 22 excess fatalities

    - 900 excess injuries

    - 10,300 PDO

    B/C = 7.3 in favor of right on red

    Comparison of two examples
    Comparison of two examples

    • Are you in favor of right on red?

    • Is right-on-red worth the extra fatalities?

    • Why is it that we feel better about the decision to adopt right-on-red and not about Ford’s decision?

    • How much should we be willing to spend to save a human life?

    Example 3
    Example 3

    The 9 Pennsylvania Miners that were trapped were rescued after 77 hours of drilling

    • The initial cost estimate of performing the rescue was $10,000,000 with a low probability of success (assume 25% probability of success)

      • Assume value of human life is $2.5 million

      • 2.5*0.25*9 = $5.625 million

      • $5.625/$10 = B/C = 0.6

    Why are we inconsistent in our perspective on human life
    Why are we inconsistent in our perspective on human life

    • Anonymity

      • “Identifiable Victim Effect”

      • Jessica McClure, 9 Pennsylvania Miners

    • Assumed risk

      • When the individual has accepted a higher level of risk

      • Astronaut

      • Sky diver

    How should we settle the costs
    How Should We Settle the Costs

    • The nine miners rescued

      • Actual cost – approximately $6 million

      • The mining company cannot afford to cover these costs.

        • U.S. Rep. John Murtha, of Johnstown, obtained a $2 million federal grant

        • State of Pennsylvania shelled out about $2 million

        • Remaining balance owed private contractors is about $2 million

      • How should we cover the unpaid cost?

      • Disney is paying each miner $150,000 for their story – should this money be used to cover the costs?

    So on what basis should we make decisions
    So on what basis should we make decisions?

    • We need to recognize that people are willing to buy some benefits with human life

      • Otherwise the speed limit would be 10mph.

    How do we determine the value of human life
    How do we determine the value of Human Life

    • Societal value of life is the value to save one life.

      • Not a specific life

      • Not what you value your own life

      • It is a statistical life

    Methods for valuing life
    Methods for valuing life

    • Willingness to pay – what are we willing to pay to reduce total deaths by one fatality

      • Since this is not a situation that is present in reality, we establish analogous situations.

        • Suppose that 5 million people were willing to buy a car with $100 safety improvement that would reduce their risk of dieing in car crash by one in 5,000. Thus we would be willing to pay $500 million to save 1,000 lives. Therefore, at a minimum society is willing to pay $500,000 for a life saved.

      • Included in the willingness to pay is the willingness to pay to avoid the pain and suffering to avoid injury or death.

    Pain and suffering
    Pain and Suffering

    • Accounting for the quality life

      • Quality-adjusted life years lost (QALY)

      • Value assigned to a perfect health year = 1

      • Value assigned to a year of death = 0

      • Injuries fit on the continuum between 1 and 0

    Methods for valuing human life cont
    Methods for valuing human life cont.

    • Direct-costs avoided

      • The amount of costs directly avoided by reducing by a single death.

        • Medical costs

        • Emergency services

        • Insurance administration

        • Etc.

    • Human capital approach

      • The amount of economic value lost by a single death or injury.

    Nhtsa values for injuries and fatalities


    Individual Cost

    Percent of Total




    Emergency Service



    Market Productivity



    HH Productivity



    Insurance Administration



    Workplace Costs



    Legal Costs



    Travel Delay



    Property Damage



    Quality of Life



    2000 value of human life



    NHTSA values for injuries and fatalities

    What are states doing 1993 survey
    What are states doing (1993 Survey)

    • Forty-five states assign a dollar value to fatality

    • Five states do not assign a dollar value but use priorities

    • Three clusters

      • Eighteen states clustered around $500,000

      • Fourteen states clustered around $1.5 million

      • Eight states between $2 and $3 million

        • Mean value $1,209,704

    Factors causing crashes
    Factors Causing Crashes

    • Driver

    • Vehicle

    • Roadway

    • Environment

    Economic cost of crashes
    Economic Cost of Crashes

    • Cost to society: $230.6 billion/ year

      • medical, rehabilitation and long term care cost ( $ 32.6 billion)

      • Work place lost productivity $59 billion

      • lost tax revenue (adding $200 from each household)

      • property damage $59.8 billion

      • Travel Delay $25.6 billion

    Source NHTSA

    National crash frequency
    National Crash Frequency

    • Fatal Crashes – 37,795

    • Injury Crashes – 2,003,000

    • Property Damage Crashes – 4,282,000

    • Total killed 42,116 (5,500 were peds and cyclists)

    National crash frequency1
    National Crash Frequency

    • Fatal

      • 1.51 Per HMVM

      • 14.79 per 100,000 people

      • 19.04 per 100,000 vehicles

      • 22.02 per 100,000 licensed drivers

    • Injury

      • 109 per hmvm

      • 1,065 per 100,000 people

      • 1,371 per 100,000 vehicles

      • 1,585 per licensed driver

    Source - FHWA

    Fatal crash trends
    Fatal Crash Trends

    Source – FHWA Crash Facts Book

    Crash rate trend
    Crash Rate Trend

    Source – FHWA Crash Facts Book

    Age distribution of people killed
    Age Distribution of People Killed

    Source – FHWA Crash Facts Book

    Iowa crashes 2000
    Iowa Crashes (2000)

    • 445 fatalities

    • 100 had BAC > 0.1

    • 63,371 crashes

    • 35,974 injuries

    Crash rate calculation
    Crash Rate Calculation

    • Accounts for volume

    • May account for vehicle miles traveled (VMT)

      Crash rate =


      n = analysis time period in years (5 years for the Iowa DOT)

      DEVnode = actual daily entering vehicles for nodes and average daily traffic for road segments (for road segments up to 0.6 miles long and spot locations)

      DEVlink = Absolute value of [(Link length/0.3)x(Actual DEV)] (for road segments 0.6 miles and longer)

    Crash rate example
    Crash Rate Example

    350 crashes over 5 years

    10,000 vehicles enter the intersection daily

    Crash rate =

    = _____(350 x 106)_____ = 19.2 crashes per million vehicles

    (10,000) x 5 x 365


    • Measures seriousness of accidents

    • Iowa DOT (2001 values)

      • Fatality: $1,000,000

      • Major Injury: $150,000

      • Minor Injury: $10,000

      • Possible Injury: $2,500

      • Property damage: actual value or $2,000 if unknown

    Crash trend
    Crash Trend

    Mn/DOT Traffic Safety Fundamentals Handbook

    Fatality rates in upper midwest
    Fatality Rates in Upper Midwest

    Mn/DOT Traffic Safety Fundamentals Handbook

    Location of crashes
    Location of Crashes

    Mn/DOT Traffic Safety Fundamentals Handbook

    Crash rates by functional class
    Crash Rates by Functional Class

    Mn/DOT Traffic Safety Fundamentals Handbook

    Crash rates by design standard
    Crash Rates by Design Standard

    Mn/DOT Traffic Safety Fundamentals Handbook

    Crash type distribution
    Crash Type Distribution

    Mn/DOT Traffic Safety Fundamentals Handbook

    Crash rate per accesses
    Crash Rate per Accesses

    Mn/DOT Traffic Safety Fundamentals Handbook

    Crash rates by intersection control
    Crash Rates by Intersection Control

    Mn/DOT Traffic Safety Fundamentals Handbook

    Crash type by intersection
    Crash Type by Intersection

    Mn/DOT Traffic Safety Fundamentals Handbook

    Improving safety
    Improving Safety

    • 3 aspects

      • Driver

        • Driver training

        • Blood alcohol limits

        • Speed limits

        • Driver license restrictions

      • Road

        • Design

        • Maintenance

        • operational

      • Vehicle

        • Vehicle design has improved

        • Air bags

        • Better tires

    Introduction to economics
    Introduction to Economics

    • Economics is the study of scarce resources.

      • Micro Economics is concerned with individual consumers and producers and groups of producers and consumers known as markets

      • Macro Economics is concerned with economic aggregates or the economy as a whole

        Micro EconomicsMacro Economics

        Pricing Unemployment

        Demand Inflation

        Supply Monetary policy

    Elements of economic systems
    Elements of Economic Systems

    • Scarcity – all goods and services have relative degrees of scarcity

    • Activities

      • Consumption of goods or services

      • Production, conversion of inputs to outputs

      • Exchange – trading objects for other objects

    Markets demand supply relationships
    Markets – Demand-Supply Relationships

    • Demand Curves – The relationship between price and quantity consumed.



    Characteristics of demand
    Characteristics of Demand

    • Demand refers to a relationship

      • Quantity demanded refers to a point in the relationship

    • Demand is a reflection of wants and not needs

    • Demand curve defines what people would do when faced with certain conditions

    • Quantity demand is a function of time

    • Demand curves slope downward to the right

    Market demand
    Market demand

    Market Demand

    Individual 1

    Individual 2









    2. Market Demand consists of two or more demanders of a good

    Characteristics of demand1
    Characteristics of Demand

    • Market demand always has a slope that is greater or equal to individual demand curves

  • Price elasticities of demand is a measurement of the relative relationship between price and quantity demand. Slope is no good because it is dependent on scale

  • Arc elasticity
    Arc Elasticity





    Point Elasticity

    Properties of elasticities
    Properties of Elasticities

    • Dimensionless

    • Demand elasticities are always negative

    • Demand elasticities are discussed in terms of absolute value

      Less then 1 = inelastic

      Equal to 1 = unitary elastic

      Greater than 1 = elastic

    • The elasticity of demand curves change across the entire range of the curve

    Elasticity of demand curves
    Elasticity of Demand Curves


    Unit Elasticity






    Infinitely Elastic Demand


    • Would you expect transportation to be elastic or inelastic?

    • How would elasticities vary in the short and long runs?

    Gasoline demand in the short run and the long run


    People tend to

    drive smaller and

    more fuel efficient

    cars in the long-run


    Gasoline demand in the short run and the long run


    Supply curves
    Supply Curves

    • The relationship between price and the quantity produced

    • Characteristics of Supply

      • Supply is a relationship but quantity supplied refers to a specific point along a supply curve

      • Supply defines what a producer would actually do, not what he or she would like to do.

      • Quantity supplied is always measured in time units.

      • Supply curve for normal goods slope upward and to the right

    Supply demand analysis
    Supply – Demand analysis

    • The study of supply – demand relationships with respect to change

    • Problem – How do you know if you identified two points on a supply or a demand curve

    • Analysis of supply and demand can be done with either time series or cross sectional data












    Time series
    Time series

    • Examining a phenomena's change through time

    • Changes in prices related to a good’s demand.

      • For example, price of gasoline is related to demand for new cars (demand shift)

    • Changes in prices of related to a goods supply.

      • For example, better opening a parralle route would reduce congestion and, hence, change shift supply (supply shift)

    • Changes in income levels (demand Shift)

    Cross section analysis
    Cross-Section Analysis

    • Changes in the real price of a good.

      • For example, changes in the real price of service as locations from different distances are examined (supply shift)

    • Changes in the real prices of alternative good.

      • For example, the quantity of auto travel demand relative the available of transit (demand shift)

    • Change in income levels of cross sections (demand shift)

    Equilibrium markets
    Equilibrium Markets







    Network equilibrium
    Network Equilibrium

    The paths through the network represent an equilibration between supply and demand

    Wardrop s principles
    Wardrop’s principles

    • Wardrop's first principle states: The journey times in all routes actually used are equal and less than those which would be experienced by a single vehicle on any unused route. Each user non-cooperatively seeks to minimize his cost of transportation. The traffic flows that satisfy this principle are usually referred to as "user equilibrium" (UE) flows, since each user chooses the route that is the best. Specifically, a user-optimized equilibrium is reached when no user may lower his transportation cost through unilateral action.

    Wardrop s principles1
    Wardrop’s principles

    • Wardrop's second principle states: At equilibrium the average journey time is minimum. This implies that each user behaves cooperatively in choosing his own route to ensure the most efficient use of the whole system. Traffic flows satisfying Wardrop's second principle are generally deemed "system optimal" (SO).

    Marginal quantities
    Marginal Quantities








    Total Revenue












    Average quantity is falling the marginal quantity is below the average.

    Average quantity is rising the marginal quantity is above the average