1 / 28

New oral anticoagulants: an update

New oral anticoagulants: an update. Julian Holmes H+T Pharmacist NUH Julian.Holmes@nuh.nhs.uk. Problems with warfarin. Variable dose INR affected by diet, illness etc Drug interactions can be problematic Narrow therapeutic index BUT – its cheap!

Download Presentation

New oral anticoagulants: an update

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. New oral anticoagulants: an update Julian Holmes H+T Pharmacist NUH Julian.Holmes@nuh.nhs.uk

  2. Problems with warfarin • Variable dose • INR affected by diet, illness etc • Drug interactions can be problematic • Narrow therapeutic index • BUT – its cheap! • AND – the INR is a good measure of compliance

  3. The clotting cascade

  4. New agents Ideally need: • Once daily constant dose for all patients • Predictable kinetics and anticoagulant effect • No problematic drug interactions • Several new agents – dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban are most advanced three

  5. Dabigatran in AF • RELY trial • Oral direct thrombin inhibitor • Half life 12-17 hours • No reversal agent • Contraindicated if CrCl<30ml/min • Substrate of efflux transporter P-glycoprotein so levels affected by inducers (St Johns Wort) or inhibitors (amiodarone, quinidine (C/I), verapamil, clarithromycin) of this

  6. Dabigatran in AF • Mortality and haemorrhagic stroke rates favoured dabigatran • Time in range ~64% for warfarin pts • Dabigatran slightly more effective than warfarin at the higher dose • Higher MI and GI bleed rates with dabigatran • Drop out trial rate of ~10% with dyspepsia with dabigatran • Now licensed in UK • NICE TA249 Mar 2012 – can be used as a treatment option

  7. Dabigatran in AF • Dose is 150mg twice daily reduced to 110mg twice daily if: • Creatinine clearance 30-50ml/min • Over 80 years • Body weight <50kg • Increased bleeding risk • On verapamil • Patients with gastritis, oesophagitis or gastoesophageal reflux • Patients continuing to take aspirin to manage a chronic condition

  8. Why Xa inhibitors over TI? • Less complicated dosing regimen • Reduced MI rate • Less GI S/E • MDS issue with dabigatran • ?easier to reverse • Dabigatran only licensed for AF and not VTE treatment

  9. Rivaroxaban in AF • Dose 20mg daily (15mg daily if CrCl 30-49ml/min or HASBLED score over 3) in ROCKET trial vs warfarin in 14,264 patients • Primary end point of stroke or systemic embolism • Rates of primary outcome 1.7% per year rivaroxaban and 2.2% per year warfarin • Bleeding rates 14.9% per rivaroxaban and 14.5% per year warfarin • Time in range for warfarin ~55%

  10. Rivaroxaban in AF • Intracranial and fatal bleeds favoured rivaroxaban • Rivaroxaban non inferior to warfarin • C/I if - CrCl less than 30ml/min, active bleeding, hepatic disease (Child’s Pugh B and C), pregnancy and breast feeding • Adverse effects – anaemia, dizziness, headache, epistaxis, GI s/e, haemorrhage • License application for Dec 2011 and NICE appraisal May 2012

  11. Rivaroxaban • Half life 7-11 hours • Review use of agents affecting haemostasis (e.g. NASIDS and anti platelets) • Metabolised by CYP3A4 so interactions could be problematic: • Inducers – barbiturates, carbamazepine, phenytoin, rifampicin, St Johns Wort – avoid use of strong inducers • Inhibitors – clarithromycin, ciclosporine, danazol, dlitiazem, erythromycin, fluconazole, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, indinavir, isoniazid, ritonavir, verapamil • Avoid itraconazole, ketoconazole, voriconazole and protease inhibitors

  12. Rivaroxaban in DVT (instead of warfarin/enoxaparin) • Patients must have a recommendation from a Haematology specialist dose is 15mg BD for 3 weeks then 20mg daily • Allergy to warfarin • Unstable INR control • Intravenous drug users • Liver disease (N.B. All anticoagulants are contraindicated in established liver cirrhosis including rivaroxaban) • Anticoagulation in malignancy • In this patient group LMWH’s are first line, warfarin and rivaroxaban should only be used if LMWH’s are contraindicated • Newly diagnosed patients with active malignancy should not be warfarinised until their treatment plan is agreed as control is often very unstable in these patients. • Patients with chronic malignant conditions eg. prostate cancer may be suitable for warfarin, but treatment should be reviewed by the specialist team if liver metastases are present. • Unable to comply with variable dosing (e.g dementia but with no support in community)

  13. Rivaroxaban for SPAF new pts • Patients must fit the criteria in the Nottinghamshire guidance (see http://www.nottsapc.nhs.uk) and have a recommendation from a secondary care Consultant Haematologist, Consultant in Stroke Medicine , or Consultant Cardiologist. Excluded patient groups are those with significant valvular disease and patients suitable for cardioversion • Patients requiring domiciliary phlebotomy • Known unpredictable alcohol excess (N.B. All anticoagulants are contraindicated in established liver cirrhosis including rivaroxaban) • Unable to comply with variable dosing schedule • Contraindications to warfarin – N.B. many contraindications for warfarin will be contraindications to anticoagulation in general, and thus are likely to be contraindications for rivaroxaban also

  14. Rivaroxaban switch in pts on warfarin • Patients must fit the criteria in the Nottinghamshire guidance (see http://www.nottsapc.nhs.uk) and have a recommendation from a secondary care Consultant Haematologist, Consultant in Stroke Medicine, or Consultant Cardiologist. Excluded patient groups are those with significant valvular disease and patients suitable for cardioversion • TTR<60% after 4 months of VKA in presence of compliance • Intolerant of VKA (e.g. side effects etc) • INR>8 without any strong cause (e.g. interacting meds) • History of significant bleed associated with poor warfarin control

  15. Rivaroxaban • Classed as amber drug for DVT and AF • Secondary care supply first month then continues in primary care • Rebate scheme available • Can refer pts to NUH anticoag for counselling etc (as per warfarin) • No INR’s needed – monitor U+E’s according to baseline renal function – see APC guideline

  16. Rivaroxaban and elective surgery • Stop rivaroxaban at least 24 hours before intervention. If procedure cannot be delayed until at least 24 hours post dose, the increased risk of bleeding should be assessed against the urgency of the intervention. This should be discussed with a haematologist. • Rivaroxaban should be re-started post procedure when risk of bleeding is judged to be low

  17. Rivaroxaban and emergency surgery/haemorrhage • No reversal agent • Can use charcoal if ingested within 1 hr • Emergency surgery – measure INR (neoplastin) or Xa level – if low proceed if not delay or give octaplex • Haemorrhage – as above and use haemorrhage control measures/tranexamic acid/octaplex

  18. Monitoring rivaroxaban • Rivaroxaban does not routinely require monitoring of therapeutic response (unlike warfarin). However, if a patient has an episode of bleeding or requires an invasive procedure, measurement of an anticoagulant effect may be advantageous. • A standard clotting screen has not been validated for assessing the degree of anticoagulation in a patient taking Rivaroxaban and should not be used for this purpose • A prothrombin time using a sensitive reagent such as neoplastin plus or a specific anti Xa can be used to measure the effect only after discussion with a haematologist.

  19. Effect of NOAC on clotting screens • Dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban are new oral anticoagulants that are alternatives to coumarins (e.g. warfarin) in selected groups of patients for certain indications. All drugs accumulate in renal impairment. • A standard clotting screen has not been validated for assessing the degree of anticoagulation in a patient taking these agents and should not be used for this purpose. Consult haematology for advice

  20. Daily costs • Dabigatran and rivaroxaban – community ~£2.60, hospital ~£1.60 • Warfarin - (+costs of drug, INR, monitoring, dosing etc) approx £0.67-0.83 daily • Apixaban likely to be similar other new agents

  21. Ongoing trials • Rivaroxaban in DVT/PE licensed - as effective as warfarin and NICE TA – dose is 15mg BD for 3 weeks and then 20mg daily • Dabigatran now C/I in MHV after trial halted • Apixaban (10mg BD for 5 days then 5mg BD for 6 months then 2.5mg BD) and Dabigatran (150mg BD after 5 days of LMWH) now approved for DVT/PE • Cardioversion trial riva vs warfarin

  22. Apixabanin AF • New oral Xa inhibitor • Behind dabigatran and rivaroxaban in development • More effective than aspirin in stroke reduction • C/I if CrCl less than 25ml/min • ARISTOTLE trial – apixaban 5mg twice daily (reduced to 2.5mg BD if any 2 of 3 of: >80yrs, <60kg, Cr>133) vs warfarin in 18, 201 patients • Primary endpoint of stroke and systemic embolism

  23. Apixaban in AF • Warfarin time in range 62% • Rates of primary outcome 1.27% per year apixaban and 1.6% per year warfarin – statistically significant • Major bleeds 2.13% per year apixaban and 3.09% warfarin • Apixaban superior for stroke prevention and causes less bleeding • Drug interactions as per riva avoid strong inhibitors of CYP3A4 or p-gp

  24. But for all new meds • Higher costs • How do we reverse if patient is actively bleeding and/or needs emergency surgery (both companies recommend rVIIa/PCC – no real in vivo data)? • Difficult to measure level of anticoagulation (dabigatran ECT/TT, rivaroxaban PT) which may vary according to RF

  25. But for all new meds • How do we measure compliance with new agents? (given data suggests approx 43% average patient compliance with new meds – NUH coag service has approx 70% of pts in therapeutic range) • Peri-operative and emergency surgery issues (cardioversion and emergency surgery) – new agents have shorter half lives so may be able to stop day before pre op • Pts will need to carry alert cards and be counselled (register pts in DAWN) by coag – need to be referred • Both C/I for AF treatment if CrCl<30ml/min – what do we do if AKI? • Will need to go back onto warfarin if do not tolerate new agents for AF

  26. Current situation • Only using rivaroxaban in selected patients (~400) and those unable to tolerate warfarin – DVT and AF • Apixaban now has NICE TA and better data for AF – for use in selected patients as above only by cardiology/stroke • All NOAC C/I in MHV • May decide to use riva in DVT and PE if pts on for up to 6-12 months – but ?if long term • Apixaban (10mg BD for 5 days then 5mg BD for 6 months then 2.5mg BD) and Dabigatran (150mg BD after 5 days of LMWH) now approved for DVT/PE • Rivaroxaban vs warfarin in cardioversion • NOAC to amber 3 shortly

  27. What do we need to do? • Check pt has had correct bloods (U+E/LFT/clotting/FBC) pre starting and 3 weeks after then according to guidelines (http://www.nottsapc.nhs.uk/attachments/article/3/APC%20statement%20re%20NICE%20CG180%20%20Atrial%20fibrillation.pdf • Check dose ok according to pts renal function • Pt information given and alert card • Counselling/DVD – side effects, missed doses, procedures etc • Check interacting meds (antiplatelets)

  28. Questions?

More Related