1 / 13

Self-organization in Science and Society: an introduction

Self-organization in Science and Society: an introduction. What is STS?. Usually we think about science having impact on society: eg cars and sex in 1950s But society has an impact on science: eg

wyome
Download Presentation

Self-organization in Science and Society: an introduction

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Self-organization in Science and Society: an introduction

  2. What is STS? • Usually we think about science having impact on society: eg cars and sex in 1950s • But society has an impact on science: eg the global warming “debate” was largely the creation of oil company funding (cf. http://www.ucsusa.org/publications/catalyst/exxon-exposed.html • The impact can also be good (as we will soon see) • Nature is also in this dielectic: so…

  3. What is STS? The trielectic:

  4. What isn’t self-organization? Top-down: someone in charge organizes stuff Military—general, commander Corporation—CEO Catholic church—Pope Suburban layout—architect Automotive design—designer Computer chip--engineer Fine art—artist Orchestra-conductor What is self- organization? Bottom-up: the stuff organizes itself: Biological evolution Flocks and swarms: bees, birds, whales, wolves, etc. Crowdsourcing: WWW, Wikipedia, Open Source, etc. Subsumption architecture (robotics), Molecular self-assembly (nano),

  5. Why do dictatorships love linear order?

  6. Why do democracies accept disorder?

  7. What about in-between? top-down bottom-up • This spectrum exists for many other systems: eg human nervous system combines • centralization (brain vs peripheral ns) with self-organization (neural nets) • Note that thinking about social structures can help us think about natural structures

  8. How disorganized can self-organization be? Salt crystal forms from evaporating water. Completely ordered. Trivial case. Toss a handful of particles in the air: “self-organized” but without order. Trival case Sand waves from wind action: a quasi-ordered emergent pattern. Significant case. Self-organization tends to be a more salient description when describing systems between total order and total disorder

  9. Top-down tools Bottom-up tools

  10. Top-down tools Bottom-up tools

  11. Most theories of self-organizing systems fall under the rubric of “Complexity Theory.” But what is the distinction between Complexity Theory and Theorizing Things that are Complicated? Which is more complex? • A gas made of 15 million molecules randomly crashing about? OR • A school made of 15 fish gracefully swirling though water?

  12. Emergence is global behavior of a system resulting from collective interactions of loosely coupled components.Temperature: an emergent property of swarms of molecules. But temperature is based on the average velocity of molecules (E=3kT/2). Linear relation, you can use statistics. Flocking: an emergent property of swarms of animals (birds, ants, fish, etc.). Flock movements are not well characterized by averages or statistics. They are nonlinear, adaptive, anticipative, have memory. They have synergy: the whole is greater than the parts. “Complicated” just means there is so much going on we can’t keep track of it Complexity: synergistic emergent behavior; often adaptive (hence “complex adaptive systems”).

  13. But we can go even deeper • At the heart of self-organization lies recursion • Recursion is also at the heart of many social ideals: democracy, freedom, egalitarianism. • Therefore it should be no surprise that some of the founders of self-organization in science were also activists for self-organization in society.

More Related