1 / 43

Last Lecture:

Last Lecture:. Lennard-Jones potential energy for pairs of atoms and for molecular crystals Evaluation of the Young’s and bulk moduli from the L-J potentials Response of soft matter to shear stress: Hookean (elastic) solids versus Newtonian (viscous) liquids

Download Presentation

Last Lecture:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Last Lecture: • Lennard-Jones potential energy for pairs of atoms and for molecular crystals • Evaluation of the Young’s and bulk moduli from the L-J potentials • Response of soft matter to shear stress: Hookean (elastic) solids versus Newtonian (viscous) liquids • Description of the viscoelastic response with a transition at the characteristic relaxation time, t

  2. Time Scales, the Glass Transition and Glasses, and Liquid Crystals 3SCMP 10 February, 2004 Lecture 4 See Jones’ Soft Condensed Matter, Chapt. 2 and 7

  3. Slope: tis the relaxation time t Response of Soft Matter to a Constant Shear Stress: Viscoelasticity t We see that 1/Go (1/h)t An alternative expression for viscosity is thus h Got

  4. Relaxation and a Simple Model of Viscosity • When a liquid is subjected to a shear stress, immediately the molecules’ positions are shifted but the same “neighbours” are kept. • Thereafter, the stress falls to zero, as the constituent molecules re-arrange to relax the stress. • A simple model of liquids imagines that relaxation takes place by a hopping mechanism, in which molecules escape the cage formed by its neighbours. • Molecules in a liquid vibrate with a frequency, n,comparable to the phonon frequency in a solid of the same substance. • Thus n can be considered a frequency of attempts to escape a cage.

  5. Molecular Relaxation Time • The probability P of successful escape is given by a Boltzmann distribution: P ~ exp(-e/kT) • We see thatemust be a vibrational energy barrier per molecule. As T 0, then P0, whereas when T, then P1 (100% success) • Typically, e 0.4 Lv/NA, where Lv is the heat of vapourisation per mole. • Eyring proposed that the frequency of successful escapes, f, is then the product of the frequency of attempts and the probability of success: • The time required for a molecule to escape its cage defines a relaxation time,t, which is comparable in magnitude to the macroscopic relaxation time. And so, f = 1/t.

  6. Arrhenius Behaviour of Viscosity • In liquids, t is very short, varying between 10-12 and 10-10 s. Hence, as commonly observed, stresses in liquids are relaxed nearly instantaneously. • In melted polymers, t is on the order of several ms. • From our discussion of viscoelasticity, we know that h Got. Hence an expression for h can be found from the Eyring relationship: • Alternatively, an expression based on the molar activation energy E can be written: • This is referred to as an Arrhenius relationship.

  7. where B and To are empirical constants. Non-Arrhenius Temperature Dependence • Liquids with a viscosity that shows an Arrhenius dependence on temperature are called “strong liquids”. • “Fragile liquids” show non-Arrhenius behaviour that requires a different description. • An example of a fragile liquid is a melted polymer, which is described by the Vogel-Fulcher relationship: We see that h diverges to , as the liquid is cooled. In the high-temperature limit, h approaches ho.

  8. Temperature-Dependence of Viscosity Arrhenius P = Poise

  9. Configurational Re-Arrangements • As a liquid is cooled, stress relaxation takes longer, and it takes longer for the molecules to change their configuration, as described by the configurational relaxation time, tconfig. • From the Vogel-Fulcher equation, we see that: We see that the relaxations become exceedingly slow as T decreases towards To.

  10. Debonding of an Adhesive Experimental Time Scales • To distinguish a liquid from a solid, flow (or other liquid-like behaviour) must be observed on an experimental time scale, texp. • For example, if a sample is being cooled at a rate of 1 K per min., then texp is 1 min. at each temperature. Flow is observed on long time scales, texp At higher temperatures, texp > tconfig, and flow is observed on the time scale of the measurement.

  11. Are Stained-Glass Windows Liquid? Medieval church windows are thicker at their bottom. Is there flow over a time scale of texp100 years? Window in the Duomo of Siena

  12. The Glass Transition • At higher temperatures, texp > tconfig, and so flow is observed on the time scale of the measurement. • As T is lowered, tconfig increases. • When T is decreased to a certain value, known as the glass transition temperature, Tg, then tconfig ~ texp. • Below Tg, molecules do not change their configuration sufficiently fast to be observed during texp. The substance appears to be solid-like, with no observable flow. • At T = Tg, h is typically 1013 Pas, compared to h = 10-3 Pas for water at room temperature.

  13. 1/texp 1/Tg Competing Time Scales  =1/tvib Log(1/t) tconfig < texp Melt (liquid) f = 1/tconfig tconfig > texp glass Reciprocal Temperature (K-1)

  14. An Example of the Glass Transition

  15. Effect of Cooling Rate on Tg • Tg is not a constant for a substance. • When the cooling rate is slower,texp is longer. • For instance, reducing the rate from 1 K min-1 to 0.1 K min-1, increases texp from 1 min. to 10 min. at each increment in K. • With a slower cooling rate, a lower T can be reached before tconfig texp. • The result is a lower observed Tg. • Various experimental techniques have different associated texp values. Hence, a value of Tg depends on the technique used to measure it.

  16. Thermodynamics of Phase Transitions • How can we classify the glass transition? • During a transition from one phase to another, we see that will be discontinuous:

  17. Classification of Phase Transitions • A phase transition is classified as “first- order” if the first derivative of the Gibbs’ Free Energy G with respect to any variable is discontinuous. • In the same way, in a “second-order” phase transition, the second derivative of the Gibbs’ Free Energy G is discontinuous.

  18. Thermodynamics of First-Order Transitions • Gibbs’ Free Energy, G: G = H-ST so that dG = dH - TdS - SdT • Enthalpy, H = U+PV so that dH = dU + PdV + VdP • Substituting in for dH, we see: dG = dU + PdV + VdP - TdS - SdT • The central equation of thermodynamics tells us: dU = SdT - PdV • Substituting for dU, we find: dG = SdT - PdV + PdV + VdP - TdS - SdT Finally, dG = VdP-TdS

  19. V There is a heat of melting, and thus H is discontinuous at Tm. liquid (Or H) crystalline solid Tm T Thermodynamics of First-Order Transitions • dG = VdP - TdS • In a first order transition, we see that V and S must be discontinuous: Viscosity is also discontinuous at Tm.

  20. Glass Tg Tm Thermodynamics of Glass Transitions V Liquid Crystalline solid T

  21. Thermodynamics of Glass Transitions Faster-cooled glass Glass Tg Tm Tfcg Tg is higher when there is a faster cooling rate. We see that the density of a glass is a function of its “thermal history”. V Liquid Crystalline solid T

  22. Experimental Results for Poly(Vinyl Acetate) Data from Kovacs

  23. Is the Glass Transition Second-Order? • CP is found from -(dG/dT)P. Then we see that the heat capacity can be given as: • Thus in a second-order transition, CP will be discontinuous. • Recall that volume expansivity is defined as: • So, expansivity is likewise discontinuous in a second-order phase transition.

  24. Entropy of Glasses • Since the glass transition is not first-order, entropy, S, is not discontinuous. • The disorder in a glass is similar to that in the melt. Compare to crystallisation in which S jumps down at Tm. • S can be determined experimentally from integrating plots of CPversus T. • S for a glass depends on the cooling rate. • As the cooling rate becomes slower, S becomes lower. • At a temperature called the Kauzmann temperature, Sglass = Scrystal. • The structure of a glass is similar to the liquid’s, but there is greater disorder in the glass compared to the crystal of the same substance.

  25. Kauzmann Paradox Liquid Glass Crystal

  26. Kauzmann Paradox • Sglass cannot be less than Scrystal. • But by extrapolation, we can predict that at sufficiently slow cooling rate, Sglass will be less than Scrystal. This prediction is a paradox! • Paradox is resolved by saying that TK defines a lower limit to Tg as given by the V-F equation. • Experimentally, it is usually found that TK To (V-F constant). Typically, Tg - To = 50 K. • This is consistent with the prediction that at T = To, tconfig will go to . • Tg equals TK when texp is approaching , which would be obtained via an exceedingly slow cooling rate.

  27. Why does the Glass Transition Occur? • Adam and Gibbs (1965) proposed that as the temperature of a liquid is lowered, more and more atoms must co-operatively re-arrange. • If the number of atoms/molecules required for co-operativity is z*, and the barrier for each molecule to move is m, then t will vary with T as: Z* = 9

  28. Structure of Glasses • There is no discontinuity in volume at the glass transition and nor is there a discontinuity in the structure. • In a crystal, there is long-range order of atoms. They are found at predictable distances. • But at T>0, the atoms vibrate about an average position, and so the position is described by a distribution of probable distances.

  29. Atomic Distribution in Crystals 12 nearest neighbours And 4th nearest! FCC unit cell (which is repeated in all three directions)

  30. Comparison of Glassy and Crystalline Structures 2-D Structures Local order is identical in both structures Crystalline Glassy (amorphous) Going from glassy to crystalline, there is a discontinuous decrease in volume.

  31. Structure of Glasses and Liquids • The structure of glasses and liquids can be described by a radial distribution function: g(r), where r is the distance from the centre of a reference atom/molecule. • The density in a shell of radius r will have r atoms per volume. • For the entire substance, let there be ro atoms per unit volume. Then g(r) = r(r)/ro. • At short r, there is some predictability of position because short-range forces are operative. • At long r, r(r) approaches ro and g(r) 1.

  32. Liquid Structure r

  33. R.D.F. for Liquid Argon Experimentally, vary a wave vector: Scattering occurs when: (where d is the spacing). Can very either q or l in experiments

  34. R.D.F. for Liquid Sodium Compared to the BCC Crystal 4pr2r(r) 3 BCC cells Each Na has 8 nearest neighbours. r (Å)

  35. Liquid Crystals Rod-like (= calamitic) molecules Can also be plate-like (= discotic)

  36. Density Temp. LC Phases N = director Isotropic The phases ofthermotropicLCs depend on the temperature. Nematic Attractive van der Waals’ forces are balanced by forces from thermal motion. Smectic

  37. In a “splay” deformation, order is disrupted, and there is an elastic response. When there is a shear stress along the director, a nematic LC flows. LC Characteristics • LCs display more molecular ordering than liquids, although not as much as in conventional crystals. • LCs flow like liquids in directions that do not upset the long-ranged order.

  38. Polarised Light Microscopy of LC Phases Why do LCs show birefringence? (That is, their refractive index varies with direction in the substance.) Nematic LC

  39. In the isotropic phase: Birefringence of LCs • The bonding and atomic distribution along the longitudinal axis of a calamitic LC molecule is different than along the transverse axis. • Hence, the electronic polarisability (ao) differs in the two directions. • Polarisability in the bulk nematic and crystalline phases will mirror the molecular. • The Clausius-Mossotti equation relates the molecular characteristic ao to the bulk property (e or n2):

  40. LC Orientation n  Director N N Higher order Distribution function Lower order 

  41. Diffraction from LC Phases L a

  42. Order Parameter for a Nematic-Isotropic LC Transition S The molecular ordering in a LC can be described by a so-called order parameter, S: 1 Nematic Isotropic Discontinuity at Tc: First-order transition 0

  43. Problem Set 2 1. The latent heat of vaporisation of water is given as 40.7 kJ mole-1. The temperature dependence of the viscosity of waterhis given in the table below. (i) Does the viscosity follow the expectations of an Arrhenius relationship with a reasonable activation energy? (ii) The shear modulus G of ice at 0 C is 2.5 x 109 Pa. Assume that this modulus is comparable to the instantaneous shear modulus of water Go and estimate the characteristic frequency of vibration for water, n. Temp (C)0 10 20 30 40 50 h(10-4 Pa s) 17.93 13.07 10.02 7.98 6.53 5.47 Temp (C)60 70 80 90 100 h(10-4 Pa s) 4.67 4.04 3.54 3.15 2.82 2. In poly(styrene) the relaxation time for configurational rearrangementstfollows a Vogel-Fulcher law given as t = toexp(B/T-To), where B = 710 C and To = 50 C. In an experiment with an effective timescale oftexp= 1000 s, the glass transition temperature Tg of poly(styrene) is found to be 101.4 C. If you carry out a second experiment withtexp = 105 s, what value of Tg would be obtained?

More Related