1 / 5

Information from INGRID

Information from INGRID. Without any restrictions, Absolute flux ( normalization ) uncertainty ~ 30% Absolute cross-section uncertainty ~ 30%. From INGRID, Integrated [ On-axis neutrino flux ] x [ Cross-section ]. We can check the agreements of [ flux ] x [ cross-section ].

vahe
Download Presentation

Information from INGRID

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Information from INGRID Without any restrictions, Absolute flux ( normalization ) uncertainty ~ 30% Absolute cross-section uncertainty ~ 30% From INGRID, Integrated [ On-axis neutrino flux ] x [ Cross-section ] We can check the agreements of [ flux ] x [ cross-section ]. Otani ( 2010 Aug. collaboration meeting )

  2. Information from INGRID Otani ( 2010 Aug. collaboration meeting )

  3. Information from INGRID NINGRIDDATA : # of interactions obtained from data ( efficiency corrected ) NINGRIDMC : # of interactions estimated by MC NINGRIDMC = [ flux ]MC x [ cross-section ]MC RINGRID = NINGRIDDATA / NINGRIDMC NINGRIDDATA = RINGRID x NINGRIDMC =( 1 + cflux ) x [ flux ]MC x ( 1 + cs ) x [ cross-section ]MC RINGRID =( 1 + cflux ) x ( 1 + cs ) INGRID group can provide RINGRID .

  4. Information from INGRID Once we know RINGRID, RINGRID =( 1 + cflux ) x ( 1 + cs ) Here, cs is almost same in SK The s difference between Fe and O above 1 Gev agrees with simple model expectation. ( ≤ 10 % ) Expected number of interactions at SK ( NSK ) can be estimated as NSKcorrected ~ ( 1 + cflux ) x ( 1 + cs ) x NSKMC Here, we can not forget the following facts: • Systematic uncertainty in extrapolating • cflux at INGRID to cflux at SK, • cs was justified above 1GeV.

  5. Correlation of the fluxes at INGRID and at SK ESK Region in red circle shows the characteristic of off-axis beam. EINGRID Relative error estimated by beam group

More Related