1 / 71

SOCI 3006 – Collective Behaviour July 2006 Review #2

SOCI 3006 – Collective Behaviour July 2006 Review #2. 1. Administrative all materials for test are on website password for website is cjrocks. 2. General Categories of Collective Behaviour “Collective behaviour may be defined as those forms of

urit
Download Presentation

SOCI 3006 – Collective Behaviour July 2006 Review #2

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. SOCI 3006 – Collective Behaviour July 2006 Review #2

  2. 1. Administrative • all materials for test are on website • password for website is cjrocks

  3. 2. General Categories of Collective Behaviour • “Collective behaviour may be defined as those forms of • social behaviour in which usual conventions cease to • guide social action and people collectively transcend, • bypass or subvert established institutional patterns • and structures” (Turner and Killian, 1987) • Violent/Destructive Collective Behaviour • mass suicides – usually, hysterical beliefs form the basis, • strong group pressures to conform to belief structures, • group practices (but do they attract particular • personality dispositions?) – Heaven’s Gate group in 1997, • Jonestown, Guyana in 1977)

  4. 2. General Categories of Collective Behaviour • mob violence – normally non-violent people attacking • people or property with the goal of destroying, injuring, • killing – may be organized or unorganized •  lynchings •  Crown Heights, Brooklyn, NY • Riots – sudden outbreaks, often a ‘venting’ of collective • emotion – can be deadly and destructive, or ‘celebration’ • riots •  hockey riots •  Christie Pits 1933 •  May Day celebrations in Akron, Ohio, 1994 •  Chicago Bulls, 1997 riot

  5. 2. General Categories of Collective Behaviour • mob violence – normally non-violent people attacking • people or property with the goal of destroying, injuring, • killing – may be organized or unorganized •  lynchings •  Crown Heights, Brooklyn, NY • Riots – sudden outbreaks, often a ‘venting’ of collective • emotion – can be deadly and destructive, or ‘celebration’ • riots •  hockey riots •  Christie Pits 1933 •  May Day celebrations in Akron, Ohio, 1994 •  Chicago Bulls, 1997 riot

  6. 2. General Categories of Collective Behaviour • (b) Consumers and Collective Behaviour • crazes and panics – crazes are usually motivated by financial • gain - the Beer Can collecting craze in the 1970’s; Western • gear in Japan; chain letters; Elmo; Barbie – panics are • motivated by fear, often of financial loss – like • the crash of 1929; Nortel • fads – the desire to possess, not necessarily for profit – • often created by marketers, mass media – dance fads, • toy fads (Davey Crocket), game fads (Trivial Pursuit; Monopoly) – • on the whole, harmless activities

  7. 2. General Categories of Collective Behaviour • (c) Hysterias • rumors – a piece of information that is not or cannot be • verified – often spreading rapidly during periods of • anxiety/concern, in the absence of other more reliable • information – Mcdonald’s worm-burgers, Colgate/Palmolive, • summer camp rumours • physical hysteria – a physiological manifestation of • collective behaviour – the June Bug phenomenon in 1962; • release of the film The Exorcist • millenarian groups – belief in the world coming to an end • on a given date – either utopian vision or apocalyptic • (catastrophic) vision – Miller and the Millerites, 1831

  8. 2. General Categories of Collective Behaviour • (c) Hysterias • sightings and miracles – religious apparitions (Fatima; Sabana • Grande; Thomson, Man.) – also UFO sightings (Rozwell)

  9. 4. Deadly Riots – the Los Angeles Riot of 1992 • 1965 – the Watts riot – the most deadly, destructive riot until Miami, 1980 • 1992 – the Los Angeles riot tops the list in terms of destruction, death • “a riot is a violent and emotional social disruption” • may be destruction of property, injuries, death • note the Plymouth/Massachusetts Bay Colony riot of 1634 • the most violent riots of the 20th century generally stemming from issues of race, social class (note p. 110 of text)

  10. 4. Deadly Riots – the Los Angeles Riot of 1992 (cont’d) • the 1992 L.A. riot also known as the ‘Rodney King’ riot • text uses Smelser’s value-added theory to analyze riots • riot resulted in 51 deaths; 2, 383 injuries; $1 billion in damages, over 700 businesses burned over a three-day long period of rioting, burning, looting, violence, shooting • 25 square block area of the city was devastated • http://archives.cnn.com/2002/US/04/28/la.riot.anniversary

  11. 4. Deadly Riots – the Los Angeles Riot of 1992 (cont’d) • the L.A. riot exploded after the verdict was announced in the Rodney King case • March 3, 1991 – King pursued in high-speed car chase by L.A. police officers – ‘Tasered’, but did not succumb to the weapon – subsequently beaten with batons (56 times hit) causing multiple fractures, nerve damage, broken ankle, etc. • George Holliday, living in an apartment overlooking the incident, filmed it • http://www.seeingisbelieving.ca/handicam/king/ • Holliday’s tape shown over and over again on national news

  12. 4. Deadly Riots – the Los Angeles Riot of 1992 (cont’d) • despite calls for him to step down, L.A. Police Chief Daryl Gates refused • four officers involved in beating tried beginning March, 1992 in a changed venue, Ventura County (98% white) • April 29, 1992 – verdict in – hung verdict on one count against officer Laurence Powell, not guilty on all other charges • immediately following verdict outrage in Black, Hispanic communities in particular – quickly erupted into destruction of property, then violence – by the next day, 2400 National Guard troops brought in, curfews implemented • Blacks did not account for the majority of rioters

  13. 4. Deadly Riots – the Los Angeles Riot of 1992 (cont’d) • ANALYSIS • structural conduciveness – outrage against courts, system of justice, failure to punish officers involved – lack of available legitimate channel to express their outrage – communication among the aggrieved parties, combined with other factors, including densely populated urban core streets, warm weather, availability of weapons, businesses to loot, vandalize • structural strain – perception of ongoing racism in justice system – history of past riots, shootings of Blacks, tension between Black/Hispanic communities, poor community relations between police and citizens, excessive force allegations, then the Rodney King incident

  14. 4. Deadly Riots – the Los Angeles Riot of 1992 (cont’d) • ANALYSIS • generalized belief – belief among Blacks, Hispanics, others that justice cannot be had for them – media edited tape selectively – naturally, most members of the public assumed the officers would be convicted – Mayor Bradley’s statements further supported belief that ‘system had failed’ • mobilization of participants – note that no rioting itself occurred in Ventura County – but rather, South-Central L.A., with violence directed first at authority symbols, then at convenient, ‘safe’ targets – note role of media here in a leadership role, directing rioters, unintentionally(?) urging them on

  15. 4. Deadly Riots – the Los Angeles Riot of 1992 (cont’d) • ANALYSIS • social control – L.A. police underestimated reaction to verdict (note Gates at a fund-raiser) – poor planning, coordinated, intelligence, tension between Mayor and Chief of Police, not enough officers on duty even to begin to handle situation – question? – what have police learned since the L.A. riots?

  16. 4. Deadly Riots – the Los Angeles Riot of 1992 (cont’d) • ANALYSIS • classification of participants – (from Turner and Killian) • ego-involved (the most personally ‘engaged’ and ‘invested’ in the outcome of the verdict) • concerned (not so invested, but possibly helpful to the rioters, generally supportive) • insecure (those just ‘along for the ride’ because they want to be part of it, but not really invested at all) • spectators (lots of these in the L.A. riots) • ego-detached exploiters (L.A. riots literally taken over by these – the looters, targets changed from authority symbols to businesses, and ransacking these)

  17. SOCI 3006 – Collective Behaviour July 2006 Lecture 8

  18. 1. Administrative • hand back midterm • supplementary test – Thursday, July 20, 2006 • supplementary test – 20 multiple choice/true-false • supplementary test worth 10 marks • essays due Thursday, July 20 • all materials for test are on website • password for website is cjrocks

  19. 2. Images, Miracles and Apparitions • a common form of collective behaviour • generally take place in a public, secular setting, despite their • often religious nature (note Durkheim on sacred/profane) • Images • belief in the spontaneous appearance of a religious • figure on an everyday object • e.g. - the face of Jesus on a grilled cheese sandwich; • Jesus and other figures observed on walls, automobile • body parts; frying pans; windows, storage tanks, etc. • all follow a similar pattern; some individual notices • the image, interprets it as the likeness of a religious • figure, interprets this as some form of miracle, tells • friends, who may then tell others

  20. 2. Images, Miracles and Apparitions (cont’d) • Images • interest/belief in images usually relatively short-term • those who believe in the image accept that it is caused • by a mundane event (rust, stains, lighting, etc.) but • believe that these things have been somehow • manipulated by a divine force to show the image • - accessibility by large crowds a key factor • Miracles • tangible physical objects that ‘miraculously’ move, or • cry, drip blood, etc. • miracles often more denomination-specific, less • plausible to general public, more likely to occur indoors

  21. 2. Images, Miracles and Apparitions (cont’d) • Miracles • usually belief/non-belief straightforward – either the • statue of the Virgin is bleeding, or it is not, or at least • not real blood • usually requires predisposition to believe (religious) • Apparitions • - involve the miraculous appearance of a figure – religious, • ghosts, angels, famous people – but unlike images and • miracles, the apparition if most often visible to only • one or a handful of people • - may involve claims from some individuals that they are • able to communicate with the apparition • - why so many apparitions involve young girls?

  22. 2. Images, Miracles and Apparitions (cont’d) • The Soybean Savior – Jesus on an Oil Tank • Fostoria, Ohio, 1986 • Locher analyzes incident using Smelser’s value-added • theory • structural conduciveness (religious Christian • community, rural, image was easily viewed from cars, • August was nice weather in evenings, vacation time, • image appeared just off the most traveled road in town) • - structural strain (high crime rate, hard economic times, • very hot, dry weather)

  23. 2. Images, Miracles and Apparitions (cont’d) • The Soybean Savior – Jesus on an Oil Tank • generalized belief (devout believers, devout skeptics, • doubting participants, nonbelievers) • - mobilization of participants (local people strongly • urged others to take a look; the media got involved • (August 1986 a slow news time), religious leaders • social control – local authorities unable to deter • onlookers, so managed, facilitated orderly viewing • note: how important a single individual’s ‘definition of the • situation’ was in creating, shaping events • what caused this event to end?

  24. 2. Images, Miracles and Apparitions (cont’d) • Our Lady of Clearwater • Clearwater, Florida, 1996 – 2001 • again, use of Smelser’s value-added theory • also, use of Turner and Killian’s types of crowd • participants (ego-involved, concerned, insecure, • spectators, exploiters)

  25. 3. Rumours, Urban Myths and Urban Legends • a rumour is an unconfirmed statement or fact passed through • informal communication • often rumours arise in situations of anxiety/uncertainty, where • individuals will seek any sort of information to make sense of • what is happening • tellers may repeat rumours out of a feeling of ‘being in the • know’ or feeling powerful – status, attention, to create excitement • believers consider the information plausible and accept it as • fact • rumours often serve to confirm what believers already suspect or • want to believe is true

  26. 3. Rumours, Urban Myths and Urban Legends (cont’d) • urban legends are a form of rumour told as a story (the • bathtub legend, or the Eddie Murphy legend; the Hippie girl • and the baby in the oven) • urban myths are a form of rumour told in regard to a specific • ‘fact’ (cocaine in Coca Cola; tooth in Coca-Cola; the myth • of babies sacrificed by Satanic Cults – Geraldo Rivera) • the Proctor and Gamble rumour – and analysis using the • emergent norm theory

  27. 3. Rumours, Urban Myths and Urban Legends (cont’d) • uncertainty and the ‘rumour public’ – belief that ‘something is • wrong with the country’ and this ‘Satanism’ promoted by a • large corporation could be it • urgency – if something not done quickly, the devil would take over • but note as well poor economy at the time • communication of mood and imagery – the circular reaction • among the rumour public – the role of the church newsletters and • direct-mail flyers (also, eventually, Am-Way) • constraint – in particular, among religious congregations fueled • by their Ministers

  28. 3. Rumours, Urban Myths and Urban Legends (cont’d) • selective individual suggestibility – polarization of beliefs, • leading to spread of acceptance of rumour by those already • selectively likely to accept (religious groups) • permissiveness – free to discuss, share concerns, different • versions, ‘takes’ on the rumour, openly • note: why do we accept rumours when we suspect/know they • are false?

  29. SOCI 3006 – Collective Behaviour July 2006 Lecture 9

  30. 1. Administrative • all materials up to Lecture 8 are on website • password for website is cjrocks

  31. 2. Fads • fads appear quickly, and disappear just as quickly • may be related to physical activities (mini-golf, dances) • fads may re-surface periodically (skateboarding; roller • skating/blading, skipping) • activity fads - centre on leisure-type activities like dances, • physical activities (phone-booth or VW stuffing), often • heavily promoted in mass media • useful product fads - K-Tel products; the ‘silver bullet’; • gasoline additives; backyard vinyl swimming pools

  32. 2. Fads • frivolous product fads – Pet Rocks; plastic flamingo lawn • ornaments • 3. Crazes • different than fads, involve the purchase, investment in • something in order to make a profit • need to be distinguished from legitimate, real increase • in commodities, stocks – in the case of crazes, speculation • usually in terms of things that have little or no use value • often the ‘craze’ commodities become value-less overnight • e.g. – the Florida land craze; Alaska gold-rush; buried • treasure

  33. 4. Toy Fads • the ‘hot’ Christmas toy • Tickle-me-Elmo, Beanie Babies, Furby Frenzy, X-Box, • GI Joe, Cabbage Patch Dolls, etc. • in rush to acquire the toy, collective violence can • erupt, financial speculation, etc. • note – how the toy fad can actually lead to increased • social interaction, milling, communication, etc. • uncertainty – often, created by toy manufacturer, media as • a way of boosting sales, selling out product • urgency – there is only a limited number, and a limited time • frame in which to get the product – importance here of • media, rumours, creating a sense of panic

  34. 4. Toy Fads • communication of mood and imagery – note importance • here of milling behaviour, depictions of this in media, • rumour networks, stores creating circumstances, line-ups • increasing communication of a sense of uncertainty, • urgency • constraint – both normative influence and informational • influence – feeling that, maybe the others who you see • doing this know something you don’t know • selective individual suggestibility – the tendency for • crowd members to ‘selectively’ attend to, integrate • information, behaviour that confirms/conforms to the • new emerging norms • permissiveness – the sense that behaviours, attitudes • normally unacceptable are okay in this new situation (e.g. pushing, shoving, lying)

  35. 4. Toy Fads(cont’d) • classification of participants – ego-involved (parents, • grandparents, relatives), concerned (those attempting • to get a toy for someone else), insecure (getting a toy • for the sake of saying you got one), spectators (shoppers, • the general public, media), ego-detached exploiters • (counterfeiters, bootleggers, pirates, scalpers) • note: to what extent do fads represent a desire to possess a • status position, as defined by social norms (the good parent)

  36. 5. Millennialism • what happened to the dire predictions for the year 2000? • the Y2K Apocalypse? • note that much of the concern began with the potential • inability of older computers to handle the four digits • required to distinguish the year 2000 from the number 00 – • a potential problem in being able to accurately calculate • dates, billing, many statistics, etc. – predictions that, • for example, the Shuttle would be lost in space, computer • networks would grind to halt • many alarmist writers, commentators predicted some sort • of modern day apocalypse – cars would stop running, • infrastructure would crumble, chaos would result, ATMs • would stop working, bank accounts could disappear, etc. • brisk business in Y2K survival guides

  37. 5. Millennialism • unfortunately, cooler, calmer heads and scientists were • dismissed as being ‘head in the sand’ fools – and were • rarely heard from in the press • differing levels of fear, concern, preparation in response • to Y2K – everything from ignoring it, to stocking up on • cash, gas, water to retreating with guns, etc. in cabins in the • remote wilderness to live ‘off the grid’ until the world • returned to normal • hardcore believers in the Y2K apocalypse took several • forms: the “end of the world as we know it” types, the • Christian millenarians, the “Luddite survivalists” • softcore believers – no apocalypse, but brownouts, blackouts, • at the extreme but unlikely, meltdown

  38. 5. Millennialism • the cautious and worried – panic, get ready just in case • Y2K skeptics – minor problems, faith in science and • human ingenuity, we’ll get through this somehow • the official government position – leaning toward • hysteria – advising keep on hand a three-day supply of • food and water in their homes – but as the actual date • approached, calmer heads prevailed • The Chain of Beliefs – the domino effect; civil disorder and • rioting in the streets; ‘foreigners’ and terrorism; fear itself • of what was to come would create chaos without any • precipitating event; the predominance of rumour and the • role here of the mainstream media

  39. 5. Millennialism • Y2K, the “Prophets’ and the “Profits’ – make hay while the • sun shines – what role did they play in promoting panic • in a self-fulfilling prophecy? • note: what actually happened on January 1, 2000? • reactions to the ‘Great Disappointment’ • analysis – emergent norm theory, value-added theory and • the individualist perspective (also sociocybernetic theory) • the definition of the situation and its importance

  40. SOCI 3006 – Collective Behaviour July 2006 Lecture 10

  41. 1. Administrative • all materials on website • password for website is cjrocks

  42. 2. Social Movements • a social movement is created when a group of people organize • in an attempt to encourage or resist some kind of social change • goal is usual to achieve some kind of political influence or • political power • social movements composed of ‘ordinary people’

  43. 2. Social Movements (cont’d) • social movements are usually made up of a number of • different organizations (e.g. the environmental preservation • movement – Greenpeace, Greens, Sierra Club, etc.) – also, • feminist movement, Gay Rights movement • some debate over social movements are another form of • collective behaviour, or a distinct form of ‘collective action’ • in society

  44. 2. Social Movements (cont’d) • like other forms of collective behaviour, social movements • do represent group forms of ‘deviant’ or non-institutionalized • behaviour (e.g. passive resistance; protests; boycotts; • petitions), and emergent norm phenomena take place, social • strain is released, etc.

  45. 2. Social Movements (cont’d) • unlike other forms of collective behaviour social movements • are: • 1. organized – there is a division of labour, use of • resources, conscious decision to be a part of a social • movement, to devote time, possibly money • 2. deliberate – there are clear goals, plans to achieve these, • fund-raising, membership drives, publicity planning, etc. • 3. enduring – social movements are long-lasting, with • the goal of having their agenda become institutionalized, • as in the form of a bureaucratic organization (e.g. Nader’s • Raiders)

  46. 2. Social Movements (cont’d) • types of social movements • 1. alternative social movements – designed to create change • in the way people think or behaviour in relation to a • specific issue (e.g. DARE; animal rights movement) • 2. redemptive social movements – want to create a change, • but only in some individual’s lives (e.g. – Christian • fundamentalist missionaries; Jehovah’s Witnesses) • 3. reformative social movements – desire is to create change • on a broad scale, in an entire community or society – • both progressive (MADD; Gay Rights; suffrage) • and reactionary or countermovement (Ku Klux Klan; • the Weathermen; DAMM).

  47. 2. Social Movements (cont’d) • types of social movements • 4. revolutionary social movements – goal is to completely • destroy the old social order and replace it with a • new order (e.g. American/French revolution; IRA; • Russian Revolution, FLQ, etc.)

  48. 2. Social Movements (cont’d) • resistance to social movements – usually resistance • strongest from those who stand to lose the most if the • social movement is successful (e.g. gasoline engine • manufacturers; automobile manufacturers lobbying against • mass transit; anti-Kyoto movement) • 1. ridicule – can attempt to portray either movement • followers, or those in power as stupid, uninformed, • selfish – through use of cartoons, advertising, in • mass media – note the John Kerry incident

  49. 2. Social Movements (cont’d) • 2. co-opting – can take some component of the social • movement and bring it over to the opposing side – • for example, by (a) making up a name for the opposing side • that sounds very similar to that of the social movement • (e.g. the Greener Earth Society coalition of electricity • and utility companies) and (b) hiring way the social • movement’s leadership – the example of Candy Lightner, • founder of MADD being hired by the American Beverage • Institute; also, promotion into management of union • leadership

  50. 2. Social Movements (cont’d) • 3. formal social control – in the form of legitimate force used • to control demonstrations, ensure public order; in the use • of law and local ordinances/bylaws to control, hinder, • harass those involved in the social movement; and finally, • through the use of violence – as in use of violence by • police during civil rights movement; by pro-life • movement; by Ku Klux Klan; killing of Chinese • dissidents in Tiananmen Square

More Related