1 / 17

SCHOOL BOARD CONCEPT BRIEFING

SCHOOL BOARD CONCEPT BRIEFING. Concept of the Operation. Phase I - Identify “Fully Qualified” Officers Phase II - Re-validate Deferred Phase III - Identify “Best Qualified” Officers, Foreign School Recommendations Phase IV - Identify Show Cause

tress
Download Presentation

SCHOOL BOARD CONCEPT BRIEFING

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SCHOOL BOARD CONCEPT BRIEFING

  2. Concept of the Operation • Phase I - Identify “Fully Qualified” Officers • Phase II - Re-validate Deferred • Phase III - Identify “Best Qualified” Officers, Foreign School Recommendations • Phase IV - Identify Show Cause • Phase V - Produce Board Products/AAR Completion

  3. PHASE I Identify Fully Qualified Officers • Vote files (1 through 6 +/-) • Identify possible Show Cause cases • Establish/Review OML • Establish Fully Qualified Line • AAR Input

  4. EXAMPLE WORD PICTURE Verbiage of word picture and location of FQ line are board decisions 6 +/- 5 +/- 4 +/- 3 +/- 2 +/- 1 FULLY QUALIFIED NOT FULLY QUALIFIED

  5. IAZ Population Hard Vote Draw “FQ” line (Board decision based on word picture) NOT FULLY QUALIFIED PHASE I Identify Fully Qualified Officers MAX Score (102 +17) FULLY QUALIFIED MIN Score (17)

  6. PHASE I Identify Fully Qualified Officers Establish an Order of Merit List X 3 MFE OS FS SCORE 102+17 OML RANK 1 FQ NFQ XXXX 17

  7. Concept of the Operation • Phase I - Identify “Fully Qualified” Officers • Phase II - Re-validate Deferred • Phase III - Identify “Best Qualified” Officers, Foreign School Recommendations • Phase IV - Identify Show Cause • Phase V - Produce Board Products/AAR Completion

  8. PHASE II Re-validate Deferred Officers • Deferred officers have been selected by previous boards and have not been slated to attend. • Deferred officers do not count toward selection requirements. • Do not compare with those presently under consideration. • Limit the review to material changes since the original selection. Examples of “Material Changes” provided in DA Memo 600-2 are: • a. Record of punishment under UCMJ • b. Letter of Reprimand • c. Relief for Cause • d. Marked decline in performance or potential

  9. Example Word Picture Re-Validate Deferred Officer • Validate to attend SSC • No material change in file since selection YES • Material change in file since selection • Recommend revocation of “select” status NO • Officer should be required to “Show Cause” for: • Misconduct • Substandard performance of duty • Moral or professional dereliction, and/or • Actions inconsistent with national security SC

  10. Concept of the Operation • Phase I - Identify “Fully Qualified” Officers • Phase II - Re-validate Deferred • Phase III - Identify “Best Qualified” Officers, Foreign School Recommendations • Phase IV - Identify Show Cause • Phase V - Produce Board Products/AAR Completion

  11. PHASE III Identify Best Qualified Officers • Review OMLs • Fill foreign school requirements • Tentatively identify officers that are best qualified on OMLs based on requirements • Identify “Alternate” requirements on OMLs • Break ties to produce clearly defined OMLs • AAR Input

  12. PHASE III Identify Best Qualified Officers Draw Tentatively Best Qualified Line and Alternate based on the Maximum Selection Capability SCORE 102+17 MFE OS FS OML RANK 1 xxx xxx xxx TBQ: Alt: xxx xxx xxx FQ NFQ 17 XXXX

  13. Foreign School Selection • Foreign school recommendations are advisory only. • Officers should indicate an interest in the school. • Officers recommended as a principal must be “best qualified” (Identified as a Principal from the SSC Army board) • Officers recommended as Alternates must be “best or fully qualified” (Identified as a Principal or Alternate from the SSC Army board) • Officers recommended must meet grade and language requirements of the school. • All schools are Branch / Functional Area Immaterial.

  14. Concept of the Operation • Phase I - Identify “Fully Qualified” Officers • Phase II - Re-validate Deferred • Phase III - Identify “Best Qualified” Officers, Foreign School Recommendations • Phase IV - Identify Show Cause • Phase V - Produce Board Products/AAR Completion

  15. PHASE IV Identify Officers to Show Cause IAW 600-8-24, Chapter 4 • Substandard performance of duty • Misconduct • Moral/Professional dereliction • Actions inconsistent with national security Sponsor Presents Case Summary Board Deliberations & Voting Sponsor Signs SC Memorandum

  16. Concept of the Operation • Phase I - Identify “Fully Qualified” Officers • Phase II - Re-validate Deferred • Phase III - Identify “Best Qualified” Officers, Foreign School Recommendations • Phase IV - Identify Show Cause • Phase V - Produce Board Products/AAR Completion

  17. Questions?

More Related