1 / 17

AEGIS-X: Results from the Chandra survey of the Extended Groth Strip

AEGIS-X: Results from the Chandra survey of the Extended Groth Strip. Elise Laird A Georgakakis (NOA), K Nandra (PI: Imperial), J Aird (Imperial), D Croton (Berkeley), K Bundy (U Toronto), A Coil (Steward), C Pierce (UCSC), and the AEGIS team.

tieve
Download Presentation

AEGIS-X: Results from the Chandra survey of the Extended Groth Strip

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. AEGIS-X: Results from the Chandra survey of the Extended Groth Strip Elise Laird A Georgakakis (NOA), K Nandra (PI: Imperial), J Aird (Imperial), D Croton (Berkeley), K Bundy (U Toronto), A Coil (Steward), C Pierce (UCSC), and the AEGIS team

  2. All Wavelength Extra-Galactic International Survey • Deep multiwavelength data • Wide area (~0.5 -1.0 deg2) • Keck/DEIMOS DEEP2 spectroscopy: >10,000 redshifts with R<24.1, mainly 0.6<z<1.4 GALEX HST/ACS Chandra Palomar aegis.ucolick.org; Davis et al. (2007) The X-ray Universe 2008, Granada

  3. AEGIS-X survey • 1.6 Ms over 0.67 deg2 (8 ACIS-I pointings) • Flux limits (1% complete); • SB (0.5-2 keV) 5.3 x 10-17 cgs • HB (2-10 keV) 3.8 x10-16 cgs • 1325 sources, selected between 0.5 and 7 keV • <1.5% spurious sources • 0.79” astrometric accuracy Laird et al. submitted to ApJS The X-ray Universe 2008, Granada

  4. AEGIS-X survey AO9: additional 1.8 Ms over 0.2 deg2 • 1.6 Ms over 0.67 deg2 (8 ACIS-I pointings) • Flux limits (1% complete); • SB (0.5-2 keV) 5.3 x 10-17 cgs • HB (2-10 keV) 3.8 x10-16 cgs • 1325 sources, selected between 0.5 and 7 keV • <1.5% spurious sources • 0.79” astrometric accuracy Laird et al. submitted to ApJS Reduced data, data products, catalogues publicly available at http://astro.imperial.ac.uk/research/aegis The X-ray Universe 2008, Granada

  5. AEGIS-X survey ---- L* at z=1 • Using Maximum Likelihood technique to find secure counterparts: • optical: 76%, complete to RAB=24.1, 6% spurious matches • IRAC 3.6m: 94% (of sources with coverage), complete to mAB=23.8, 1% spurious matches • Currently ~35% spectroscopic completeness (with DEEP3  60%) 800ks data • Spectroscopy: • Keck/DEEP2 (Davis et al. 2003) • MMT (Coil et al. 2008) The X-ray Universe 2008, Granada

  6. “QSO mode” Merger (QSO-mode) models (e.g. Hopkins et al. 2005): • gas rich major merger • gas inflows trigger BH accretion & starbursts • dust/gas clouds obscure AGN • AGN feedback sweeps away gas, quenching SF and BH accretion “Radio mode” Weak AGN feedback models in dense regions (e.g. Croton et al. 2006; Bower et al. 2006): • cooling flows in groups or clusters   large cold-gas reservoirs at galaxy centre • weak AGN activity invoked to suppress cooling flows by either heating of mechanically sweeping away the gas Hydra-A cluster, McNamara et al. 2000 AGN formation models Kazantzidis et al. 2005 The X-ray Universe 2008, Granada

  7. Colour-magnitude relation DEEP2 survey, 0.4<z<1.4; Willmer et al. 2006 • Colour bimodality: • Blue cloud: star-forming • Red sequence: evolved stellar pop • Galaxy stellar mass builds via mergers in blue cloud • Rapid quenching RS • Are AGN responsible for quenching? • Or for maintaining galaxies on RS? Dry mergers? Quenching Merger-driven star formation e.g. Strateva et al 2001; Bell et al 2004; Faber et al 2007 The X-ray Universe 2008, Granada

  8. Colour-magnitude relation for AGN z=0.6-1.4; Nandra et al. 2007 The X-ray Universe 2008, Granada

  9. Colour-magnitude relation for AGN • Are AGN responsible for the quenching? • Obscured X-ray sources in RED cloud: old stellar populations • X-ray surveys select AGN after the quenching of the star-formation • Are there obscured AGN (in star forming galaxies) below X-ray detection threshold? • Are obscured AGN found in post starburst galaxies? z=0.2-0.7 z=0.7-1.4 Coil et al. 2008 The X-ray Universe 2008, Granada

  10. X-ray stacking results: 24m bright sample  Stack X-ray emission of galaxies at different regions of CMD and in post starburst galaxies Georgakakis et al. 2008 • Hard signal around valley and in red sequence, C>–0.15 • Obscured AGN associated with transition galaxies • <Lx> = 1041 erg s-1 Stacked signal of 26 post starbursts: HR > 0.35. <LX>~1041 ergs/s The X-ray Universe 2008, Granada

  11. AGN host galaxy morphologies 0.2<z<1.4 LX>1042 erg s-2 65% E/S0/Sa Massive, bulge dominated, red, evolved hosts Pierce et al. 2007 Gini coefficient: clumpiness; M20: central concentration Abraham et al. 2003; Lotz et al. 2004 The X-ray Universe 2008, Granada

  12. AGN stellar mass function Hasinger et al. 2005 No Evidence for AGN hosts “downsizing” in mass Accretion rate evolution? Bundy et al. 2008 Also Babic et al. 2007 for z<1 in CFD-S The X-ray Universe 2008, Granada

  13. Large scale structure A. Coil AGN: Massive galaxies tracing large scale structure Also ECDF-S: Silverman et al. 2008; XBootes Murray et al. 2005; Hickox et al. 2008 The X-ray Universe 2008, Granada

  14. AGN/Galaxy cross-correlation function Split into 2 redshift bins: z=0.2-0.7 and z=0.7-1.4 X-ray AGN cluster like red galaxies, at z~0.5 and z~0.9 Relative bias of X-ray AGN to galaxies: z=0.7-1.4 red gals: 1.1 (0.1) blue gals: 1.7 (0.1) z=0.2-0.7 red gals: 1.1 (0.1) blue gals: 1.4 (0.1) Coil et al. 2006 Coil et al. 2008 The X-ray Universe 2008, Granada

  15. Randomised optical X-ray AGN: relationship to groups • Gerke et al. (2006) optical spectroscopic groups • 42% of X-ray AGN in groups • Excess compared to general population (~99%) • Tentative excess relative to matched galaxy population (~91%) • Tentative evidence that field AGN more luminous than group AGN (~98%) Randomised optical X-ray Also Miyaji et al. 2007; Silverman et al. 2008 0.7< z< 1.4; Georgakakis et al. 2008 The X-ray Universe 2008, Granada

  16. Conclusions • Typical AGN at z~1 are in massive, red host galaxies • Star formation has terminated or is terminating • Many obscured AGN on red sequence • Bulge dominated, mergers not main trigger • Stellar Mass Function • Flat, non-evolving, no downsizing in mass • Large scale structure environment • Dense environments (cluster like hosts) • Around ~40% in groups • Most black hole growth at z<1 not in “QSO mode” The X-ray Universe 2008, Granada

  17. AEGIS-X advertisement • All reduced data and data products for AEGIS-X released 1 May 2008. • Processed other Chandra deep fields in same way and reduced data, data products & source catalogues also released • Chandra Deep Field North (2Ms) • Chandra Deep Field South (2Ms) • Extended Chandra Deep Field South (4 x 250 ks) • Also large area, shallow ELAIS-N1 and XBootes surveys http://astro.imperial.ac.uk/research/aegis The X-ray Universe 2008, Granada

More Related