1 / 18

CRS Stack – an alternative implementation?

CRS Stack – an alternative implementation?. S. Dümmong, C. Vanelle and D. Gajewski University of Hamburg. Motivation. Test an alternative search scheme Model independent meaning of the stacking parameters

teddy
Download Presentation

CRS Stack – an alternative implementation?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CRS Stack –an alternative implementation? S. Dümmong, C. Vanelle and D. Gajewski University of Hamburg

  2. Motivation • Test an alternative search scheme • Model independent meaning of the stacking parameters • Still valid for the extension to other stacking cases (offset, converted waves, anisotropy)

  3. Outline • Introduction • Alternative CRS parametrization • Synthetic data example • Real data example • Conclusions and outlook

  4. Introduction • Original CRS stacking concept for the 2D case: • Parametrization in midpoint/half offset coordinates • Fitting hyperbolic surfaces to the data • Defined through three parameters (α, Knip, Kn) • More traces contribute to one CMP position • 3D optimization problem • Split into three 1D optimizations

  5. Introduction

  6. Alternative CRS parametrization • Alternative formulation: • Shot- and receiver coordinates • Three stacking parameters: first and second derivatives of the traveltime • Traveltime formula after Vanelle and Gajewski (2002) • Model independent meaning of the stacking parameters is used

  7. Alternative CRS parametrization • Extension to offset stacking in the original parametrization: • Combinations of parameters have to be determined • Due to the parametrization in midpoint and half offset coordinates • Physical interpretation/meaning is lost • In this alternative parametrization: • Same parameters can be used • Also valid for anisotropy and converted waves

  8. Alternative CRS parametrization • 3D optimization problem: • Split into one 1D and one 2D optimization • Optimizations are performed in special subsets of the data (CMP gather, CR/CS gather) • Parameters are determined in prestack data

  9. Alternative CRS parametrization Prestack Data CR/CS Stack 2D optimization Automatic CMP Stack 1D optimization CRS Stack optionally local 3D optimization

  10. Synthetic data example • Data set: Sigsbee 2a

  11. Synthetic data example

  12. Synthetic data example

  13. Real data example • Data set: BGR99-07

  14. Real data example

  15. Real data example

  16. Conclusions and outlook • Alternative CRS Stack implementation was presented: • Alternative optimization scheme • All parameters are determined in prestack data domain • Model indenpendent meaning of the stacking parameters • Better images in the original parametrization: • Higher S/N ratio in the subsets of the data (ZO section from the Automatic CMP Stack)

  17. Conclusions and outlook • Sections weighted with semblance show almost the same image quality in both parametrizations • Alternative implementation could be improved: • Conflicting dip handling • Optimize the searching scheme in the 2D optimization • Extension to offset stacking is straightforward

  18. Acknowledgements • Thanks for the support to: • Wave Inversion Technology (WIT) Consortium • University of Hamburg • Thanks for the attention

More Related