1 / 19

Canada

Canada. In the Age of Imperialism. Canadian Nationhood. French & British Canadian rebellions in 1837-38 Failed but underscored cultural divide Durham Report – “Two nations warring in the bosom of a single state” Said Crown should allow Canadians better representation

Download Presentation

Canada

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Canada In the Age of Imperialism

  2. Canadian Nationhood • French & British Canadian rebellions in 1837-38 • Failed but underscored cultural divide • Durham Report – “Two nations warring in the bosom of a single state” • Said Crown should allow Canadians better representation • Economic and population growth and the costs of empire led to Canadians and the Crown to pursue confederation • Efforts led by Sir John A. Macdonald and George E′tienne Cartier

  3. Canadian Nationhood • Three conferences • Charlottetown (PEI) Conference 1864 - Maritime provinces had insisted on their own separate govts • NS, NB, PEI • Larger provinces pushed successfully for larger union • 2nd conf. scheduled • Quebec Conference 1864 • Adopt “72 Resolution” – basis for confederation • Representation question settled by agreement on bi-cameral parliament (HofC & Senate) • Smaller provinces demanded this • Also agreed to split Province of Canada into Quebec and Ontario

  4. Canadian Nationhood • London Conference – Dec. 1866 • “72 Resolutions” presented to British govt. • Formed basis for British North America Act • Signed by Queen Victoria in April 1867 • Dominion of Canada officially born July 1, 1867 • Four Provinces • Ontario, Quebec, New Brunswick & Nova Scotia • Others follow in the coming decades • Ottawa selected as capital • 2 official languages – English and French • Federal system of power sharing between natl. govt. and provinces similar to U.S. • Legislature similar to British Parliament rather than U.S. Congress

  5. Canadian Westward Expansion • PM Sir Wilfrid Laurier’s govt. pushed for westward expansion • Min. of Interior Clifford Sifton extolled virtues of western Canadian land and resources • Opportunities for personal advancement and prosperity • Expansion of markets and employment • Growth of Canadian seaports

  6. Min. of Interior Clifford Sifton Canadian PM Sir Wilfrid Laurier

  7. One Concern…Immigrants • In luring immigrants, quantity or quality? • Sifton argued a policy emphasizing quality • Sought 3 types of immigrants • Americans, Northern England/Scotland, and Euro farmers and peasants willing to WORK • Paid shipping agents to sift those coming to Canada • British Canadians feared becoming a minority in their own country • Insisted upon “Canadianizing the Newcomer” and limiting numbers

  8. PM Laurier Pushes Railroad Expansion • Called on Parliament to fund expansion • Said western people, resources, markets needed to be connected to the East • Used patriotic statements and stern warnings about foreign competitors tapping western trade • “Heaven grant that it be not already too late…” Laurier • Railroads got govt. funding but ended up over-building, losing money, and competing with unfunded RRs • Critics charged that RRs should have been privately funded • At least they would look for the promise of commercial success before sinking money into a project

  9. Did Canada Consider Itself Part of the Empire? • Many identified with glories of the empire • Independence appealed to many but feared U.S. annexation • Some even wanted annexation but talk of it or independence … • “(was) absurdity, if not treason” (Sir John Thompson (1893) • When some in Quebec were attracted to annexation by the U.S. • Opponents stated that “to remain French there is only one thing we can do: remain English.” (Judge Louis Jetté, Quebec Superior Court)

  10. 3 Different Views • Canadian imperialist Stephen Leacock • Colonialism a worn-out idea & independence dangerous and unwise • Imperial Federation would provide greatest benefits • French Canadian Nationalist Henri Bourassa • British Imperialism demands colonial men and material – French Canadian men included • French Canadians have undying love for France • All decisions should be made by B & F Canadians • Sir Wilfrid Laurier – Moderate • Strong policy of Canadianism makes greatness for country and Empire

  11. Stephen Leacock Henri Bourassa

  12. What Did Britain Expect? • Sharing costs of Empire • Colonial Sec. Joseph Chamberlain stated • Canada is mature and should not expect mother country to continue paying for its defense • All colonies should contribute to the defense of the empire as a whole • Commercial relations should be inter-imperial • This would hasten development in colonies and make Britain independent of foreign goods

  13. French vs. British Canada • French Canadians generally thought Canada should not fight Empire’s wars outside North America • British Canadians eager to assert nationalism through active participation in imperial affairs • Laurier hoped to avoid F vs. B Canadian fight • Critics called him “Waffley Wilfy” or “Sir Won’tfrid • F C’s - Canada’s contribution to Empire – defense of Canada • B C’s – Best protection of Empire – common imperial military system

  14. The American Issue • Settlement of disputed border between Alaska & Canada went in U.S. favor • Thanks to swing vote of British member of an arbitration committee • Happened under Laurier’s Liberal Party • Canadians generally upset with U.S. & GB • U.S.-proposed free trade agreement supported by Laurier as way to open U.S. market to western Canadian ag. Goods • Conservs portrayed plan as damaging to Canada • Next election – Conservatives won control of Parl.

  15. Robert Borden • A conservative who was weak on issues dealing with Quebec • Had to balance pro-Empire BCs and anti-imperial FC nationalists • Issues dealing with Imperial strength and Canadian defense were unsolved as WWI commenced • Political divide prevented real progress • WWI even provoked a divide • Heavy losses made FCs question involvement

  16. First World War in Canada • Super-patriots hostile to “Enemy Aliens” & foreigners in general • Tax increases • Inflation due to rapid war-related industrial expansion • Railways nationalized to keep supplies and men moving • Jobs, wages, inflation all rose • Benefits of market during war offset by inflation • Outnumbered FC opponents of conscription couldn’t defeat it • War over before conscripted troops made a difference but political consequences would be costly

  17. After the War • Canada won promises of greater input in imperial decisions • Canada signed Treaty of Versailles • Canada joined League of Nations • Soldiers had to be resettled • Often at expense of women in workplace

  18. Realities of Nationalism and Imperialism • Canada felt no automatic obligation to collective security • Canadians sought “normalcy” like U.S. • PM Mackenzie King’s government concentrated on domestic harmony before foreign affairs during the 20s • The 1926 Balfour Declaration finally created the Commonwealth with Britain and its dominions considered as equals in a partnership • The Statute of Westminster (1931) finalized the constitutional definition of “commonwealth” • Canada gained control over most foreign and domestic policy

  19. End of an Empire? • Perhaps a start • Nationalists in Canada hailed the new relationship • Commonwealth did reduce collective security somewhat but that was something most Canadians, especially French Canadians, wanted. • Some felt that Canada betrayed the Empire in pushing for autonomy • Canadians increasingly preferred to believe that “those who lived in fireproof houses had no need for insurance. (Winnipeg Free Press)

More Related