Planning for Future Weather and Climate

1. DON’T FORGET TO USE TAHOMA FONT Planning for Future Weather and Climate East Midlands Planning for Future Weather and Climate Briefing Event: Nottingham 28th February 2011 gerry.metcalf@ukcip.org.uk Gerry Metcalf Knowledge Transfer Manager UK Climate Impacts Programme

2. The UK Climate Impacts Programme (UKCIP) “Helps organisations to assess how they might be affected by climate change, so that they can prepare for its impacts”. Set up by UK Government in 1997 Funded by Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) Based at University of Oxford Works through: Stakeholder-led research Partnerships Programmes, and Capacity building Common tools/datasets (free)

3. UK Climate Impacts Programme (UKCIP) The UK Climate Impacts Programme (UKCIP) helps organisations to adapt to inevitable climate change. Since 1997 UKCIP has been working with the public, private and voluntary sectors to assess how a changing climate will affect: construction, working practices, demand for goods and services, biodiversity, service delivery, spatail planning, health, local authorities, central government, transport, waste, business, etc Warmer temperatures, heavier rainfall, rising sea levels: our website can help you plan to adapt, so that you can prepare for negative impacts, and take advantage of any positive ones. All our tools and services are freely available. Contact for spatial planning: gerry.metcalf@ukcip.org.uk

4. Aims for today • to identify the specific wants and needs of spatial planners in the East Midlands wrt adapting to changing weather and climate • in order to: • inform the development of a support programme to be funded by the EM RIEP • Proposed support programme can include: • One-to-one support for individual authorities • Support for clusters of (neighbouring or thematic) authorities • Workshop programme • Publications on selected topics • Others

5. Programme for today • Aims: Project context ? Those present ? • Policy Context: In a policy vacuum what should we do? • Other strategic questions to be answered • Spatial scales • Target Audiences • Style • Content • Others • Existing materials to support spatial planners • Workshop: Consider alternative approaches • Summary and Next Steps

6. The story so far………. Consider the support needs of spatial planners in dealing with Adaptation to changing climate and weather UKCIP and partners (TCPA, CABE, RTPI, POS, etc) prompted by national RIEPs leading to UKCIP and partners in support of RIEPs in EMworkshops held to map material that is already available identifies gaps that need to be filled Leading to Further work on what identifying what practicing planners need/want

7. Changing Policy context • Adaptation Sub-Committee (ASC) – First Adaptation Report • CBI – Adaptation Report • Demise of NI188 • Demise of RDAs, and GOs • Future of LSPs? • Role of LEPs • Demise of Statutory Spatial Planning framework • Demise of Regional Planning • New localism • Big Society • Others?

8. Adaptation Sub-Committee (ASC) report – Sept 2010 Identifies five adaptation priorities for UK: Land use planning Providing national infrastructure Designing and renovating buildings Managing natural resources Emergency planning Many of which are relevant to D4FC

9. CBI report September 2010 Recommendations for Business Include climate risks in business risks assessment Adaptation strategies – sustainable and direct cost benefits Risk evaluations: supply chains; assets; operations, markets, regulation, reputation Climate exposure made explicit in corporate reporting Share adaptation information to achieve consistency Recommendations for Government Present UKCP09 as ‘best available prediction’ for non-climate specialists Provide public information on climate risks to critical public infrastructure Climate Change Risk Assessment orchestrate climate adaptation across regulated sectors, the planning process, and public infrastructure procurement Consistent approach across regulatory authorities to support firms to adapt public infrastructure to long-term climate risk

10. LCLIP Process • Media Search (local and national press) • Interviews with key officers • Collating data • Analysing Data • Sharing findings

11. Typical Outputs • Executive summary containing headline messages: • Report including: • Summary of data analysis • Case studies of significant events • Record of extreme weather events over past 5 to 10years • Evidence of consequences for: • Agencies • Workloads • Budgets • Service delivery • Reputation • etc • Recommended next steps: • Monitoring

12. ‘place-shaping’ agenda links to ‘localism’ agenda Weather and climate are local phenomena Impacts and consequences of weather are even more local Local preparedness reduces local vulnerability People tend to identify with ’place’ rather than institutions Community can become involved in increasing local resilience Re-generation of existing neighbourhoods creates high profile What adaptation can be done by owner occupier? tenant? What adaptation can be done by private sector? business? SMEs? What adaptation can be done by LSP? LEP partners? Third sector?

13. Strategic Questions: Policy Vacuum • Policy Context: In a policy vacuum what should we do? • Possible responses • wait until it is all sorted out • concentrate on principles which can then be applied in whatever new frameworks emerge • seek to influence policy • others

14. Strategic Questions: Spatial Scales • Is spatial scale a useful and significant framework ? • Possible spatial scales • Regional (sub-regional) • Urban (conurbation) • Rural (countryside) • Neighbourhood • Individual Buildings • Are these appropriate and useful classifications ? • Any others ? • Any improvements in titles ?

15. Strategic Questions: target beneficiaries • Who should be the audience or beneficiary of any support ? • Different outputs can be targeted to different audiences • Are planning officers to be the principal beneficiaries ? • Other beneficiaries ? • Developers, architects, building owners, etc ? • Other officers ? • Elected members ? • Community ? • Is there any difference in requirements for unitary and district authorities ?

16. Strategic Questions: style and format • Is there any preferred style and format for publications ? • Paper ? • Electronic ? • Web-based ? • Other ? • Is there any preferred style and format for events, workshops, etc ? • Venues ? • Timing ? • Structure ?

17. Strategic Questions: Content There is a wide range of subject matter that could be covered but also many different ways in which subject matter can be organised and structured. Some of the alternative approaches are presented in a worksheet. Please work through these in small groups indicating your preferences and any other comments. Are there any other topics for consideration ? or Different ways of structuring the content ?

18. National Planning Policy Framework Consultation http://communities.gov.uk/planningandbuilding/planningsystem/planningpolicy/planningpolicyframework/The Minister has invited organisations and individuals to offer their suggestions to the Department on what priorities and policies we might adopt to produce a shorter, more decentralised and less bureaucratic National Planning Policy Framework. Please send your suggestions, by 28 February 2011, to: planningframework@communities.gsi.gov.uk or Alan ScottNational Planning Policy FrameworkDepartment for Communities and Local GovernmentZone 1/H6Eland HouseLondon SW1E 5DU Today is the last day for responses

19. Next Steps

20. www.ukcip.org.uk