1 / 18

Combinational Equivalence Checking

Combinational Equivalence Checking. Speaker: Yi-Ling Liu Advisor: Chun-Yao Wang 03/06/07. Outline. Introduction Previous Work Initial Idea Future Work. Outline. Introduction Previous Work Initial Idea Future Work. S2. ︰. S1. ︰. Introduction.

Download Presentation

Combinational Equivalence Checking

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Combinational Equivalence Checking Speaker: Yi-Ling Liu Advisor: Chun-Yao Wang 03/06/07

  2. Outline • Introduction • Previous Work • Initial Idea • Future Work

  3. Outline • Introduction • Previous Work • Initial Idea • Future Work

  4. S2 ︰ S1 ︰ Introduction • Given two different circuits, we want to check if their functionalities are the same • Ex: ? ≡ ? A ? A B ≡ B C

  5. Outline • Introduction • Previous Work • Initial Idea • Future Work

  6. Previous Work(1/2) • To exhaustively simulate all possible patterns is infeasible for practical designs with numerous inputs • The approaches to formally verify the equivalence of two networks • Structural (miter) - The capability of ATPG

  7. A B 1 0 Previous Work(2/2) • Functional - ROBDD (canonic representation) Ex: - ROBDD’s construction ?

  8. 1 - a a a a b b a 1 - (1 - a)  (1 - b) = a + b - a  b b Background(1/5) • Probability-based combinational equivalence checking

  9. (1 - a  b) + c - (1 - a  b)  c a a b 1 - a b b c Background(2/5) • Probability calculation on a tree-structure network • This expression is correct only if the network is a tree structure

  10. Background(3/5) • Aliasing – the situation that the two different networks get the same output probability • Aliasing assignment – the 1’s probability of input variable Xi is and is assigned as

  11. n Number of bits 1 2 3 4 : 24 2 4 8 16 : 16,777,216 (16M) Background(4/5) • Problem - complexity O(2n)

  12. a × b c a × b c a a b b Background(5/5) • Internal tree-structure replacement # inputs = 3 # inputs = 2 However, the tree structure is rare.

  13. Outline • Introduction • Previous Work • Initial Idea • Future Work

  14. Initial Idea (1/3) • Cut the branches - The number of inputs increases - We can’t cut the branches arbitrarily × ×

  15. Initial Idea (2/3) • Add some minterm to both circuits to eliminate the branch Ex: A B C

  16. Initial Idea (3/3) Ex: - How to find these minterms - When the branch in one circuit disappear, if the branch in the other circuit also disappear A B C

  17. Outline • Introduction • Previous Work • Initial Idea • Future Work

  18. Future Work • Think about the previous problems • Find out how SIS does the elimination of the branches

More Related