1 / 46

Team Members: Cole Marburger Kyle Kuhlman Travis McKibben

DESIGN OF A GREEN TEACHING CENTER AT THE UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO - SCOTT PARK -. Team Members: Cole Marburger Kyle Kuhlman Travis McKibben. Michael McNeill Justin Niese Michael Titus. Faculty Advisor: Dr. Jiwan Gupta. Focus & Goals.

saoirse
Download Presentation

Team Members: Cole Marburger Kyle Kuhlman Travis McKibben

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. DESIGN OF A GREEN TEACHING CENTER AT THE UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO - SCOTT PARK - • Team Members: • Cole Marburger • Kyle Kuhlman • Travis McKibben • Michael McNeill • Justin Niese • Michael Titus • Faculty Advisor: • Dr. Jiwan Gupta

  2. Focus & Goals • Design a Sustainable Building for UT’s Scott Park Campus • Utilize and Research Green Technologies • Solar Panels / Geothermal H/C • Water Conservation / Green Roof • Design based on Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Principles • Create a Unique Building to Recognize UT’s Sustainable Efforts

  3. Key Attributes • “Hands-on” Equipment Labs • Civil • Mechanical • Electrical • Computer Labs • Classrooms to Research and Study Green Technologies • Auditorium to Hold Green Seminars

  4. Site – Existing Conditions Existing Restrictions • Engineering Technologies Building • Scott Park Campus Building • 6 Baseball Diamonds • Soccer Field • Parking Lots • Scott Lake Pond

  5. Site – Existing Conditions View looking East View looking South

  6. LEED Accreditation • LEED Certification Levels: • Certified (40-49) • Silver (50-59) • Gold (60-79) • Platinum (80-110) • Minimum LEED Certification at UT: • Silver • Plan to Achieve a Minimum of Gold Level • Set the standard for “Energy and Innovation”

  7. LEED Accreditation LEED 2009 New Construction Design Manual • Checklists • Sustainable Sites • Water Efficiency • Energy & Atmosphere • Materials & Resources • Indoor Environmental Quality • Innovation & Design Process • Regional Priority Credits • Detailed Credit Info • Intent, Requirements, Potential Strategies

  8. LEED Project Checklist Example Section-Sustainable Sites • Current analysis achieves 81 points total (Platinum Rating) • Point total achieved through combined civil, mechanical, and electrical design groups

  9. LEED Accreditation • Detailed LEED Strategies Plan • Provide specific details for credits to be achieved Existing Hybrid Sign

  10. Sustainable Technologies • Solar Panels • Geothermal Heating/Cooling • Rain Water Collection • Green Roof

  11. Solar Panels • Utilize a large grid-tied system • Allow energy to be sold into the grid at low consumption times • Avoid large battery bank; making the system easier to maintain and more eco-friendly • Wirelessly monitor through a PC/Website • 36 kW tower system consisting of 6 inverters and 180 panels

  12. Geothermal Heating/Cooling • Vertical closed-loop system was developed by the mechanical group. • Reduce the Heating/Coolingcosts and earn LEED credits

  13. Rainwater Collection • Rainwater to be collected only from the main roof • 20,000 Gal. tank proposed • Irrigation to be north and west of building (Hatched area on following slide) • No potable water will be needed for irrigation

  14. Green Roof • Located on top of auditorium. Entranceon 3rd floor of main building • Green roof will feature extensivevegetation • Extensive vegetation is lighter andrequires less soil, therebyreducing the load (saturated load approximately 34 psf) • Will feature walkways and tablesfor occupants to enjoy

  15. Research Labs • Civil Experiments • Pervious Pavements • Green Roofs • Mechanical Experiments • Electric Motors • Hydrogen Fuel Powered Engines • Green Heating and Cooling Systems • Electrical Experiments • Smart Grid • Wind Turbines • Solar Panels • Storm Water Collection • LEED Design Techniques

  16. Interior Concept

  17. Exterior Plan • Utilize Kalwall TranslucentDaylighting Systems • Minimize need for artificial light • Panels provide low solar heat gain and high insulation values • Made from 20% recycled content

  18. Exterior Plan – Glass • Strategically use windows to keep occupants in touch with outside world while providing natural light

  19. Floor Layout

  20. **Entrance windows and roof not shown for clarity

  21. Structural Design • Structural Steel Frame • Procedures followed: • Load and Resistance Factored Design (LRFD) • American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Version 7 • American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) • Complete SAP 2000 v12 Analysis • Hand Calculations for Typical Members/Sections • Floor Beams • Interior/Exterior Girders • Columns • Auditorium Roof • Main Roof • Wind Bracing • Foundation

  22. Loads • 1st Floor • Dead = 200 psf • 2nd & 3rd Floors: • Dead = 100 psf • Auditorium Green Roof • Dead = 40 psf • Snow = 20 psf • Main Roof • Dead = 40 psf • Snow = 20 psf • Live = 80 psf • Live = 80 psf • Live = 80 psf • Roof Live = 20 psf

  23. SAP 2000

  24. Floor Beams • Located on the 2nd and 3rd floors • Designed to support metal decking withconcrete cover • Uniform distributed load on entire beam • Max load case: 1.2D + 1.6L • The beam was designed for the maximum bending moment • Allowable deflection controlled beam selection

  25. Interior / Exterior Girders • Designed using end reactions from connecting floor beams • Point loads at girder/floor beam connections • Max load case: 1.2D + 1.6L + .5S • 2 Typical interior and 2 exterior were designed • Allowable deflection controlled girder selection

  26. Columns • Designed using axial loading from SAP 2000 analysis – Max load: 1.2D + 1.6L + .5S • 3 Typical columns (Locations on next slide) • Main exterior (Red) • Main interior (Blue) • Auditorium (Yellow) • Maximum axial load controlled column selection

  27. N

  28. Auditorium Green Roof • Designed to support saturated green roof • Distributed load on entire joist • Max load case: 1.2D + 1.6L + .5S • Max span: 85 feet • Long span LH series roof joist • Allowable distributed load controlled selection

  29. Main Roof System • Designed using supported tributary area • Distributed load on entire joist • Max load case: 1.2D + 1.6L + .5S • Max span joist: 70’ • Max span joist girder: 34’ • 2 typical joists and 1 joist girder designed • Built-up-roof components (per UT guidelines) • Metal decking • SEBS base sheet • Type 6 glass felts

  30. Main Wind Force Resisting System • Based on ASCE 7 provisions • Wind Load Factor = 1.6 (LRFD Combinations) • 3 wind braces to resist East-West winds • 2 wind braces to resist North-South winds • 3 designs to accommodate structural differences in the building

  31. Wind Brace Locations N

  32. Typical Wind Brace

  33. Foundation Selection • Loadings obtained from SAP Analysis of the building • Pad footings with integrated auger cast piles were selected • Pad footings and piles required less concrete than strip or mat foundations • The piles transmit some load to more stable clays below grade • Four typical pad footings were designed to increase efficiency

  34. Footing Design • Soil info was obtained from boring logs of Scott Park • Estimated bearing capacity of 4 kips/sq ft for the soil • Foundation size and number of piles determined by loading and bearing capacity • Designed for one and two way shear to obtain sufficient depth for the reinforcing steel of the foundation

  35. Foundation – Layout Drawing

  36. Foundation – Detail Drawing

  37. Take Home Message • Place UT at the forefront of researching sustainable technologies • Create a learning environment for both students and the public • Provide a recognizable high performance building to showcase UT’s sustainable efforts

  38. References • AISC Steel Construction Manual. Thirteenth Edition. The United States of America: American Institute of Steel Construction, 2005 • Das, Braja M. Fundamentals of Geotechnical Engineering. Ontario: Thomson Learning, 2008. • McCormack, Jack and Russell Brown. Design of Reinforced Concrete. Hoboken: Wiley Publishing, 2009. • Leet, Kenneth M., Chia-Ming Uang, and Anne M. Gilbert. Fundamentals of Structural Analysis. Third Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2008 • Segui, William T. Steel Design. Fourth Edition. Toronto: Thomson, 2007 • United States Green Building Council. LEED 2009 for New Construction and Major Renovations Rating System. Washington, District of Columbia. November 2008.

  39. Questions ?

More Related