1 / 45

Chapter 3 Preferences

Chapter 3 Preferences Key Concept: characterize preferences by a binary comparison measuring at least as good as . Derive the indifference curves for a given preference. The marginal rate of substitution (MRS) measures the marginal willingness to pay for x in terms of y. Chapter 3 Preferences

rcharlie
Download Presentation

Chapter 3 Preferences

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Chapter 3 Preferences • Key Concept: characterize preferences by a binary comparison measuring at least as good as. • Derive the indifference curves for a given preference. • The marginal rate of substitution (MRS)measures the marginal willingness to pay for x in terms of y.

  2. Chapter 3 Preferences • Choose the “best” thing one can “afford.” • How do you find the best?

  3. Through cat-cat binary comparisons, we can find the cutest cat.

  4. A binary relation : w • (x1, x2) w (y1, y2) • (x1, x2) is at least as good as (y1, y2)

  5. (x1, x2) w (y1, y2) • This binary relation w is complete and transitive.

  6. Complete • every two bundles can be compared • for any (x1, x2), (y1, y2) • either (x1, x2) w (y1, y2) • (y1, y2) w (x1, x2) or • both

  7. Transitive • for any (x1, x2), (y1, y2), (z1, z2) • if (x1, x2) w (y1, y2) and (y1, y2) w (z1, z2) • then (x1, x2) w (z1, z2)

  8. Complete + Transitive = Rational preference

  9. From this binary relation w, one can derive two other binary relations s and i.

  10. (x1, x2) s (y1, y2) if and only if (x1, x2) w (y1, y2) and it is not the case that (y1, y2) w (x1, x2). • Read this as the consumer strictly prefers (x1, x2) to (y1, y2).

  11. (x1, x2) i (y1, y2) if and only if (x1, x2) w (y1, y2) and (y1, y2) w (x1, x2). • Read this as the consumer is indifferent between (x1, x2) and (y1, y2).

  12. Given a binary relation w and for (x1, x2), can list all the bundles that are at least as good as it -- the weakly preferred set. • Similarly, can list all the bundles for which the consumer is indifferent to it -- the indifference curve.

  13. Fig. 3.1

  14. We don’t need to use the idea of utility. • Preferences are enough.

  15. Fig. 5.1

  16. Two distinct indifference curves cannot cross.

  17. Fig. 3.2

  18. Perfect substitutes • ten dollar coins and five dollar coins

  19. Fig. 3.3

  20. Perfect complements • left shoe and right shoe

  21. Fig. 3.4

  22. Bads, neutrals

  23. Fig. 3.5

  24. Fig. 3.6

  25. Satiation • smart and tall

  26. Fig. 3.7

  27. Discrete goods

  28. Fig. 3.8

  29. Useful assumptions • Monotonicity: • the more, the better • if x1≥ y1, x2≥ y2 and (x1, x2) ≠ (y1, y2), then (x1, x2) s (y1, y2) • This implies indifference curves have negative slopes (examine).

  30. Fig. 3.9

  31. Convexity • Averages are preferred to extremes. • if (y1, y2) w (x1, x2) and (z1, z2) w (x1, x2), then for any weight t between 0 and 1, (ty1+(1-t)z1, ty2+(1-t)z2) w (x1, x2)

  32. Fig. 3.10

  33. We often assume it to get an interior solution instead of a corner solution.

  34. Strict convexity: obviously stronger than convexity. • if (y1, y2) w (x1, x2), (z1, z2) w (x1, x2), and (y1, y2) ≠ (z1, z2), • then for any weight t strictly in between 0 and 1, • (ty1+(1-t)z1, ty2+(1-t)z2) s (x1, x2)

  35. Strict convexity rules out preferences such as the perfect substitute type.

  36. To describe preferences, a useful way is to calculate the marginal rate of substitution (MRS).

  37. The MRS measures the rate at which the consumer is “just” willing to substitute one thing for the other. • Specify which for which and is evaluated where.

  38. MRS1, 2 • for a little of good 1, the amount of good 2 that the consumer is willing to give up to stay indifferent about this change • ∆x2/ ∆x1

  39. Fig. 3.11

  40. The MRS1, 2 at a point is the slope of the indifference curve at that point (to stay put) and measures the marginal willingness to pay for good 1 in terms of good 2. • If good 2 is money, then it is often called the marginal willingness to pay.

  41. Useful assumption • diminishing MRS • when you have more of x1, it can substitute for x2 less

  42. Chapter 3 Preferences • Key Concept: characterize preferences by a binary comparison measuring at least as good as. • Derive the indifference curves for a given preference. • The marginal rate of substitution (MRS)measures the marginal willingness to pay for x in terms of y.

More Related