1 / 4

THEMIS Mission Status at Peer UCB Instrument Critical Design Review UCB, April 19/20, 2004

THEMIS Mission Status at Peer UCB Instrument Critical Design Review UCB, April 19/20, 2004 Vassilis Angelopoulos University of California - Berkeley. Past to ~present. Phase B selection: Mar 22, 2003 Science/Systems Requirements Review – Jun/Jul 2003

pettit
Download Presentation

THEMIS Mission Status at Peer UCB Instrument Critical Design Review UCB, April 19/20, 2004

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. THEMIS Mission Status • at • Peer UCB Instrument Critical Design Review • UCB, April 19/20, 2004 • Vassilis Angelopoulos • University of California - Berkeley

  2. Past to ~present • Phase B selection: Mar 22, 2003 • Science/Systems Requirements Review – Jun/Jul 2003 • PDR – peer: Oct 8/9/15/16, 2003, Mission: Nov 13-14, 2003 • Confirmation Readiness Review – GSFC, Feb 4, 2004 • Confirmation Review – First attempt: HQ, Mar 4, 2004 (Aborted) • GSFC felt necessary to further reduce schedule risk • Developed better I&T flow, increased work, validated by GSFC Engineering • Developed 2 month slack in I&T flow, pushing launch to Oct 21 • Added P1 magnetics verification and calibration test • Added P1 EMC/EMI verification and calibration test • Added pressurant tank: increased mission deltaV to help: • mass posture (refocus bus on instrument hosting); • bus development schedule; • a compressed ascend and commissioning scenario • Lost dawn sector conjunctions; kept ascend schedule contingency • Instrument work kept-on full steam (ETU production & testing) • Test plans being detailed; test GSE/software being built • Test facilities being refurbished, procured or built • ETU vibration tests start April 21; electrical tests ongoing; TV: May

  3. ~Present to near future • Peer FGM/SCM CDR – Berlin, Paris, Apr 6/8, 2004 • Peer EFI/SST/ESA CDR – UCB, Apr 19/20, 2004 • Peer GBO CDR – Calgary, Apr 26/27, 2004 • Confirmation Review – HQ, Apr 22, 2004 • Baring further GSFC thunderbolts or risky reviews • Authority to spend >25% of cost • Can commit launch vehicle and launch date • Mission CDR: UCB Jun 15/16, 2003 • Design supported by ETU results satisfies requirements • Interfaces tested and per ICD • Flight test plans detailed and to environments expected • Probe I&T plans detailed;can test compliance with instr. Req’s • ETU Instrument Deliveries: April 2nd – Jun 3rd, 2004 • ETU Instrument I&T – starts May 28th, 2004 • F1 deliveries Aug 10th – Sep 27th, 2004 • F1 I&T at UCB mid-Aug to mid-Nov, 2004 • F1 EMI/MAG testing at UCB: Oct 22/26, 2004

  4. Outlook • We are relatively on-track despite 2-3 month delays in reviews • We turn adversity into opportunity and • enhance technical margins • improve development program quality • increase science capacity • A tribute to: • Explorer program support • Funds keep flowing – ensuring no delays • Engineering talent present and eager • Management support in scheduling and tracking • Tenacity, commitment and experience of team • Engineering excellence and success oriented attitude • Expect on time delivery of Integrated Suite at end of year: • EMI/MAG testing complete on instrument suite • Bugs worked out with principal attributes of IDPU-BAU interaction

More Related