Sct geometry status december 2000 christopher lester@cern ch
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 11

SCT Geometry Status: December 2000 [email protected] PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 67 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

SCT Geometry Status: December 2000 [email protected] SCT Geometry Status. DISCLAIMER: These slides are only going to deal with AGDD/XML related geometry issues. This talk is only meant to describe the work I have been closely involved in. Where are we now? Where are we going?

Download Presentation

SCT Geometry Status: December 2000 [email protected]

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Sct geometry status december 2000 christopher lester@cern ch

SCT Geometry Status: December [email protected]

[email protected]


Sct geometry status

SCT Geometry Status

  • DISCLAIMER:

    • These slides are only going to deal with AGDD/XML related geometry issues. This talk is only meant to describe the work I have been closely involved in.

  • Where are we now?

  • Where are we going?

  • Related work.

[email protected]


Q on the full sct geometry where are we now

Q: On the full SCT geometry, where are we now?

  • A: Largely where we were in August!

  • The present AGDD representation of the full SCT geometry in Geant4 is still the transcription from DICE/AGE of the geometry used for the Inner Detector TDR.

[email protected]


Barrel sct geometry

Barrel SCT Geometry

[email protected]


Forward sct geometry

Forward SCT Geometry

[email protected]


How is our geometry produced

AGDD_XmlFileBuilder

How is our geometry produced?

  • We have a basic set of numbers which parametrise the detector. These happen to be stored in an XML file called a “preXml file”.

  • We have geometrical knowledge hard coded into a C++ program. This “Geometry code” can read the preXml file and generate an AGDD/XML file.

  • The production of a well formed AGDD/XML file is made easier by using a set of generic tools provided by “AGDD_XmlFileBuilder”.

  • The “AGDD_XmlFileBuilder” tools ...

  • allow AGDD/XML files to be created as a tree in memory, rather than as a sequential output stream

  • enforce adherence to more AGDD/XML syntax requirements than present XML checkers alone

  • allow some separation between “intent” and “output format”

[email protected]


Where is the geometry generated

Where is the geometry generated?

  • All code is available in the ATLAS offline software repository under: /afs/cern.ch/atlas/software/cvs/

  • In particular:

    • the SCT specific stuff is in the package: offline/InDetDetDescr/SCT_AGDD_XmlFileBuilder

    • while the generic tools are in the package: offline/DetectorDescription/AGDD_XmlFileBuilder

[email protected]


Where are we going 1

Where are we going? (1)

  • AGDD/XML syntax is perhaps about to undergo some large changes:

    • New emphasis:

      • Detector specific elements may be introduced

      • Possible reduction of inter-dependencies within AGDD/XML files?

    • New features / expectations:

      • Level-of-detail mechanism (LeCompte et al)

      • Envelopes (Laporte et al)

      • “Surnames” (Dell’Acqua et al)

  • Some/all of the above may result in next version of geometry being very different from current !

[email protected]


Where are we going 2

Where are we going? (2)

  • Physical geometry has moved on since ID-TDR. Need to update!

    • Jo Pater is about to update existing AGE geometry to match present “best guesses” at detector configuration.

    • The next geometry produced within the AGDD/XML framework ought to be

      • generated from the “same drawings” as Jo’s new AGE geometry ...

      • … but the next AGDD/XML geometry (unlike the present one) the should not be a slavish copy of AGE. The new geometry should be constructed independently. Intended result: Better AGDD/XML, and no bad habits inherited from age.

  • Who will do all of this ? I have to write a thesis soon …..

[email protected]


Related work sct modules

Szymon Gadomski is firing particles through simulations of SCT modules

As a by-product this generates a test of SCT geometry within AGDD/XML and G4Builder framework

Related work: SCT Modules

[email protected]


Thanks to the g4 team

Thanks to the G4 Team!

  • I would like to thank the Geant4 team for help and advice they have given me over the last few months in helping me solve problems with these geometries.

[email protected]


  • Login