1 / 75

Overview of CERN Activities in 2005 Strategy for CERN Future

Overview of CERN Activities in 2005 Strategy for CERN Future. 12 January 2006 R. Aymar. Firstly… At the beginning of the New Year, I would like to convey my best wishes to all of you, members of CERN and your families for the full satisfaction of your dreams!

gad
Download Presentation

Overview of CERN Activities in 2005 Strategy for CERN Future

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Overview of CERN Activities in 2005Strategy for CERN Future 12 January 2006 R. Aymar

  2. Firstly… • At the beginning of the New Year, I would like • to convey my best wishes to all of you, members of CERN and your families for the full satisfaction of your dreams! • to formulate for CERN and for you all specific wishes and ambitions, led to success by your hard work and commitments

  3. Overview of CERN Activities in 2005Strategy for CERN futureContents • BRAVO and THANKSto each member of CERN staff , collaborative institutions and industrial firms • you can be proud of the progress achieved during 2005 • Results are visible and help to (re) build confidence for the future • Statements about progress in LHC construction • Follow up of strategy proposed in 2005: possible scientific plans • CERN Council Strategy Group for European Particle Physics • LHC construction overview • Linear Colliders ILC/CLIC • Human Resources • 5 Yearly Review of CERN employment conditions • Human Resources policy (plan prepared for MTP 2006) • Pension Fund - Strategy of Management – Governance • CERN missions besides Research / discoveries • Education / training • Technology transfer • WSIS (World summit of information society) • Open Access • Conclusion

  4. 2. Why a new structure ? • This loss of confidence in CERN management at all levelspushed the MS towards micromanagement but it never drove them away from the proper appreciation ofthe competence and motivation of the individuals in CERN. • We should recover the full confidence of the Member States. • The future of CERN depends on this recovery. 13 January 2004

  5. 3. How should this structure work? • Our cooperation with European Particle Physics Laboratories should be strengthened and deepened • more collaboration towards common goals (accelerator Departments should follow examples of Physics Department) • more active participation of CERN in ECFA • At the Council level a new (old) objective has been agreed: to steer the European PP activities (in addition to supervise the CERN Lab) 13 January 2004

  6. 4. For which scientific objectives? (1) • The following strategic orientations are proposed for CERN activities in 2004-2010: • 1. to keep the utmost priority for the completion of the LHC project, and strive for a start of operations in the summer of 2007 = machine / detectors / LCG • 2. to fulfil commitments previously made by CERN: CNGS, EGEE • 3. after an in-depth risk analysis review, to mitigate the consequences of failure of old equipment that is necessary for reliable LHC operation. 13 January 2004

  7. 5. Conclusions • With improvement in the collective interaction throughout the organization, (not only by new tools, but through voluntary human relationship) • By strengthening individual leadership and the full exercise of individual responsibility to favour the cost-schedule-performance awareness, • With an increase in the voluntary collaboration of CERN with other European PP Laboratories.I am convinced that the challenges ahead of us will be overcome: • the LHC can be ready in time (within cost) and will be another success in the large series of CERN prestigious achievements: scientific discoveries will not be far ahead, • the Members States’ confidence in CERN can be fully restored, around an agreed European scientific strategy, supported by appropriate resources, thus providing CERN with a sure future. Two milestones: end 2006 and 2009-2010. 13 January 2004

  8. Global views and strategy (2) • 2005 is going to be a year without beams (except the Booster and Isolde) but not a "dull year". • 2005 (and 2006) are absolutely crucial years to plan, carry out, and improve everything needed to: • Ensure that our priority challenge will be achieved successfully, i.e. first LHC collisions in the summer of 2007 and a rapid and safe start of operations with useful luminosity and associated results. • Prepare opportunities and essentials for the future research programme in HEP in coordinated collaboration with the European Laboratories, and clarify the future role of CERN (CERN Council’s responsibility, EU 7th Framework Programme) • Promote the recognition of CERN’s other missions: technology transfer, education and training (including fellows) 10 January 2005

  9. Global views and strategy (3) • CERN’s resources, human and financial, are scarce to face all these challenges, nevertheless we should pursue a fundamental goalto recover the full confidence of Member States in CERN’s capacities (not competences) as a whole, by completing the LHC in time and, • therefore benefiting from this success to obtain appropriate resources to support future scientific objectives, • 2005 will also be a crucial yearfor the 5-Yearly Review of employment conditions. This is neither the time nor the place to enter into possible details, but in my mind, the results of the 5-Yearly Review should provide the best support to achieving the previous goals. This will enable the recruitment of the best staff, to maintain high motivation and efficiency, and in return, an appropriate recognition of their contributions, merits and individual responsibilities. 10 January 2005

  10. International Cost and Schedule Review CommitteeReport of December 2005 • When the Committee met one year ago the LHC Project Leader was not able to present the Committee with a revised installation plan that met the February 2007 installation completion date due to: • the underground construction problems at the CMS cavern at point 5 • the installation of the QRL suspended • the design of the Distribution Feedboxes (DFBs) significantly behind schedule • Today: • magnet installation is underway in sectors 7-8, 8-1, and 4-5 • We, the Committee, are impressed with the degree of recovery from the nearly three year delay in the installation. • We applaud the Director General and the Project Leader for their complete commitment to meet the Feb 2007 Milestone and the start of beam commissioning in July 2007, we support the plan. Bravo and heartfelt thanks to all for your actions and your dedication. Afterwards the Council made the following statement: The Council took note of the status report by the Director-General and congratulated the CERN Staff and Management, together with the staff of partner institutions and industrial firms for their achievements in 2005. The Council also expresses appreciation to the Director-General for his vision and leadership. 12 January 2006

  11. Strategic plans for the future • After recognized evidence of the Laboratory’s successful achievements (in 2007), we should be entitled to come back to the MS and request approval of new scientific objectives and to provide coherent resources; • Therefore, we have to prepare the future scientific programme, and to show the motivations of the Laboratory and its individuals; • Even if we are heavily concentrated on the LHC, we should be engaged in a minimal programme of R&D and design, to reap the benefit of an increased cooperation with European Laboratories (new programmes have been launched independently of CERN); • Staff members involved in this R&D programme should feel obliged to deliver more, being privileged and suffering less pressure for procurement and installation of LHC components; • LHC completion is an indisputable priority. 10 January 2005

  12. For which scientific objectives? (6) • in 2006-2007, to decide on the implementation of the Linac 4 and any increased R&D programme, depending on new funds made available and on a new HR policy • in 2009-2010, to review and redefine the strategy for CERN activities in the next decade 2011-2020 in the light of the first results from LHC and of progress and results from the previous actions. The possible choices are at present quite open. The future role of CERN will depend on these choices and their effective funding. 10 January 2005

  13. Possible Scientific Plan • R&D pursued • CARE Joint Research Activities (PHIN, HIPPI, NED) • CLIC/CTF3 • IPHI / test for LINAC 4 to be prepared for 2006 • collaboration with CEA-Saclay (0-3 MeV) • collaboration with ITEP and BINP and previous military Russian Labs through INTC (for 3-10 and 10-40 MeV) • Studies launched or confirmed • Design Studies • CARE Network (BENE, ELAN, HHH) • EUROTEV - EURISOL - EUDET • Neutrinos Physics (scoping study) • CERN Working Groups • PAF (Proton Accelerators for the Future) to define a preferred scenario for up-grading the CERN accelerator complex (staging, schedule, resources needed for R&D and design, estimated cost) to best fit the needs of LHC up-grades, fixed target proposals (SPSC and INTC), and neutrino physics • POFPA (Physics opportunities with Future Proton Accelerators)to assess likely physics objectives of LHC up grades and non collider experiments, neutrino physics, heavy-ion physics in close liaison with PAF. • Joint Study Group • LHC-HERA • LHC-ILC • CLIC Physics 12 January 2006

  14. CERN CouncilEuropean Strategy Group for Particle Physics 1 b) New plans for the future scientific programme In June 2005, the CERN Council unanimously decided to take up the task of defining the strategy for European particle physics. In order to achieve that goal, the Council further unanimously decided to set up an adhoc scientific advisory group with the remit of making a proposal that will enable the Council to produce a strategy document, approved by all Member States. The Group will hold a workshop for one week in Berlin to finalise the strategy document; preparatory work will be led by SPC/ECFA members. 12 January 2006

  15. CERN CouncilEuropean Strategy Group for Particle Physics To that end, it was agreed that the Strategy Group should comprise: • one scientist proposed by each Delegation; • the Chairman of the SPC and the Chairman ECFA, to act as co-chairs of the Strategy Group; • some SPC and ECFA members, who would also act as the steering group; • the CERN Director-General and Chief Scientific Officer, and the Directors of Europe's other main particle physics laboratories, namely DESY, RAL, Orsay, DAPNIA, PSI, Frascati and Gran Sasso. Special meeting of the Council in Lisbon 14 July 2006 to draw conclusions on the European strategy. 12 January 2006

  16. Overview of CERN Activities in 2005Strategy for CERN futureContents • BRAVO and THANKSto each member of CERN staff , collaborative institutions and industrial firms • you can be proud of the progress achieved during 2005 • Results are visible and help to (re) build confidence for the future • Statements about progress in LHC construction • Follow up of strategy proposed in 2005: possible scientific plans • CERN Council Strategy Group for European Particle Physics • LHC construction overview • Linear Colliders ILC/CLIC • Human Resources • 5 Yearly Review of CERN employment conditions • Human Resources policy (plan prepared for MTP 2006) • Pension Fund - Strategy of Management – Governance • CERN missions besides Research / discoveries • Education / training • Technology transfer • WSIS (World summit of information society) • Open Access • Conclusion

  17. Safety • Safety is an indispensable frame for working conditions, without compromise • Two serious accidents happened last year (25/10 and 16/11 2005), one with fatal consequence • Our thoughts are with the victim's family • Internal procedures to investigate the cases did not show any failure to observe safety rules and procedures • Nevertheless, these events have raised the awareness of risks and the necessity of safety rules, safety training, safety organisation to be a permanent concern. Safety is the duty of everybody • An effort has started to review our overall safety rules to see if we can make them shorter and clearer • Another large effort, as a crash programme, concerns the preparation of the "Dossier de Sûreté" for the INB (LHC/SPS/CNGS) to be available in Feb 2006 for a review by the Safety Authorities and to get their approval for the start of LHC operation.

  18. Superconducting cable 1 (dipole inner layer)

  19. Cryodipole overview

  20. Preparation for installation in SMI2 Hall SMI2

  21. Transport in the tunnel is very tight!

  22. Transfer on jacks

  23. Cryomagnets interconnect in the tunnel

  24. Cryogenic distribution line

  25. QRL installation status 12 January 2006

  26. Cryogenics overview

  27. 24h endurance test of all power converters in 8-left (13-14 October 2005) 81 power converters in UA83  3 x 13 kA power converters  18 x 4 to 7 kA power converters  31 x 600 A power converters  29 x 120 A power converters 156 kA and 1.2 MW dissipated: PCs and Cables (estimation)

  28. THANKS for help provided by MS and non-MS for LHC commissioning (~90 Project Associates during 18 months) New Control Room in Prévessin (to be inaugurated in March 2006) unique for all needs of CERN Appointment of M. FERRO-LUZZI as LHC Programme Coordinator

  29. Conclusions • All key objectives have been reached for the end of 2005. • End of repair of QRL, reinstallation of sector 7-8 and cold test of sub-sectors A and B. • Cool-down of full sector 8-1. • Pressure test of sector 4-5. • Endurance test of full octant of power converters. • Magnet installation rate is now close to 20/week, with more than 200 installed. This, together with interconnect work, will remain the main bottleneck until the end of installation.

  30. ATLAS Barrel Toroid installation status The mechanical installation is complete, electrical and cryogenic connections are being made now, for a first in-situ cool-down and excitation test in spring 2006 12 January 2006

  31. ATLAS End-Cap Toroids The picture shows a successful trial assembly of the full cold mass in front of the vacuum vessel for the first ECT (side A) The final assembly is planned to be completed in the coming weeks 12 January 2006

  32. ATLAS Silicon Tracker (SCT) All four barrel cylinders are complete and at CERN Assembly of the four barrel cylinders is complete (left), and the SCT barrel is now being prepared for insertion into the TRT barrel 12 January 2006

  33. ATLAS Barrel Muon MDTs MDT Chamber Production (w/o EE) 1200 Bare MDT Plan Bare MDT Integrated MDT 1000 Tested MDT Installed MDT Plan Installation 800 No. Chambers 600 400 200 0 Jan-00 Jan-01 Jan-02 Jan-03 Jan-04 Jan-05 Jan-06 Jan-07 Time A major effort is spent in the preparation and testing of the barrel muon stations (MDTs and RPCs for the middle and outer stations) before their installation in-situ The electronics and alignment system fabrications for all MDTs are on schedule 12 January 2006 Installation of barrel muon station

  34. SUPERCONDUCTING COIL Total weight : 12,500 t Overall diameter : 15 m Overall length : 21.6 m Magnetic field : 4 Tesla Silicon Microstrips Pixels The CMS Detector Spokesperson: M. Della Negra CALORIMETERS Scintillating PbWO4 crystals ECAL HCAL Plastic scintillator/brass sandwich IRON YOKE TRACKER MUON ENDCAPS MUON BARREL Drift Tube Resistive Plate 12 January 2006 Chambers Chambers

  35. CMS Solenoid ‘Construction’ Coil in between the inner and outer vac-tank cylinders Preliminary end-weld of tank followed by vac-test. Final tank closure (deep penetration weld) by 20-Jan 06 Cool-down can then start. 12 January 2006

  36. DT/RPC Installation and Commissioning Barrel Yoke wheels YB+2 and YB+1: 80 (out of 210) DT/RPC Ch. Installed; 40 Ch. commissioned 12 January 2006

  37. ALICE Detector ACCORDE TOF TRD HMPID TPC PMD PHOS ITS Muon arm Spokesperson J. Schukraft

  38. ALICE Magnet field mapping 12 January 2006

  39. ALICE TPC ROC Installation 12 January 2006

  40. OT and IT Muon System Magnet RICH1 VELO RICH2 Calo. System TT LHCb Spectrometer Spokesperson: T. Nakada 12 January 2006

  41. LHCb RICH-2 transport to IP8 12 January 2006

  42. 12 January 2006

  43. LCG 2005 today 2006 cosmics 2007 First beams First physics 2008 Full physics run Building the Service SC1 -Nov04-Jan05 - data transfer between CERN and three Tier-1s (FNAL, NIKHEF, FZK) SC2 –Apr05 - data distribution from CERN to 7 Tier-1s – 600 MB/sec sustained for 10 days (one third of final nominal rate) SC3 –Sep-Dec05 - demonstrate reliable basic service – most Tier-1s, some Tier-2s; push up Tier-1 data rates to 150 MB/sec (60 MB/sec to tape) SC4 –May-Aug06 - demonstrate full service – all Tier-1s, major Tier-2s; full set of baseline services; data distribution and recording at nominal LHC rate (1.6 GB/sec) LHC Service in operation– Sep06 – over following six months ramp up to full operational capacity & performance LHC service commissioned – Apr07

  44. EGEE • After EU DATA Grid, the EU Commission has recognised the interest of grids for many sciences (later industries) and the leadership of CERN facing the needs of LHC data storage and analysis computing → large EU support to CERN for the Grid development. • Support to LCG from EGEE is important, conversely EGEE developed software should be used by LCG to insure prolonged support • lst phase of EGEE (April 2004-2006) is considered a large success • 2nd phase of 2006-2008 has been approved and more EU support granted • Next Step will require an organisation, called "EGO", to insure a permanent, qualified and secure infrastructure to be available to all sciences (services will be paid by users). 12 January 2006

  45. Overview of CERN Activities in 2005Strategy for CERN futureContents • BRAVO and THANKSto each member of CERN staff , collaborative institutions and industrial firms • you can be proud of the progress achieved during 2005 • Results are visible and help to (re) build confidence for the future • Statements about progress in LHC construction • Follow up of strategy proposed in 2005: possible scientific plans • CERN Council Strategy Group for European Particle Physics • LHC construction overview • Linear Colliders ILC/CLIC • Human Resources • 5 Yearly Review of CERN employment conditions • Human Resources policy (plan prepared for MTP 2006) • Pension Fund - Strategy of Management – Governance • CERN missions besides Research / discoveries • Education / training • Technology transfer • WSIS (World summit of information society) • Open Access • Conclusion 12 January 2006

  46. Participants: 22 Duration: January 2004 – December 2008 Total expenditures: 35.14 MEuros Total E.U. support: 15.20 MEuros The main objective of the CARE project is to generate a structured and integrated European area in the field of accelerator research and related R&D. The program includes the most advanced scientific and technological developments relevant to accelerator research for Particle Physics. It is articulated around 3 Networking Activities and 4 Joint Research Activities: • ELAN (Electron Linear Accelerator Network) • BENE (Beam for European Neutrino Experiments) • HHH (High intensity High brightness Hadron Beams) • SRF (Superconducting RF) • PHIN (PHoto-INjector) • HIPPI (High Intensity Proton Pulsed Injectors) • NED (Next European Dipole) E.U. programmes: [2/12] • Initiated: • EUROTeV • Beta beam task in EURISOL • EUDET • Considered: • LHC luminosity upgrade • Neutrino factory • Light quark and Phi factory Initiated: - None yet Considered: - None yet

  47. CERN council Restricted session (Rome July 04) • Encourages efforts towards the design and development of a Linear Collider as a unique opportunity at the precision frontier complementary to LHC • Confirms its endorsement of accelerated R&D activities for CLIC • Recognises the overall value for the world Particle Physics community of a decision to construct a TeV Linear Collider (ILC) and encourages the efforts of the leading players in that direction • Takes the view that, in the course of this process, it will be appropriate to take stock of the LHC and accelerator R&D results and produce a new assessment of the Physics and technology by 2010. • Is in the opinion that, in the initial phase (2004-2007), the organisational structure of the global initiative, in particular the ILC Central Design Team, should be light

  48. Strategy to address key issues • Key issues common to all Linear Collider studies independently of the chosen technology in close collaboration with: • International Linear Collider (ILC) study • The Accelerator Test Facility (ATF@KEK) • European Laboratories in the frame of the Coordinated Accelerator Research in Europe (CARE) and of a “Design Study” (EUROTeV) funded by EU Framework Programme (FP6) • Key issues specific to CLIC technology: • Focus of the CLIC study • All R1 (feasibility) and R2 (design finalisation) key issues addressed in test facilities: CTF@CERN except the Multi-Beam Klystron (MBK) which does not require R&D but development by industry (feasibility study already done)

  49. CERN contribution to ILC(B.Foster @ 1rst ILC workshop/KEK) • R&D on generic key issues independent of technology: • Participation inEUROTeV design study, CARE project and ELAN network • R&D on Beam diagnostics, Beam Delivery System (BDS), Beam dynamics... • Resources: 2.3 MEur. material, 25 staff-y, 20 fellows-y = 6.75 MEur. total • Tests with beam in CTF3 Test facility: • Beam instrumentation and beam simulations benchmarking • Beam combination for DR injection/extraction with RF transv. cavities • Participation to R&D on Low Emittance generation @ ATF/KEK • Available expertise on Super-Conducting technology; • Nb coated Copper SC cavities(LEP2 352 MHz and 1.5 GHz high gradient R&D) • Large scale cryogenics systems (8*18kW @ 4.5K and 8*2.4kW @ 1.8K in LHC) comparable to ILC

  50. CERN additional participation to ILC • CERN proposed as a possible European site for ILC • Participation to the site specific cost of ILC • Civil engineer: J.L.Baldy/CERN • Strong collaboration with DESY (Costing engineer) taking advantage of TESLA cost study and CERN specific technology experts (Cryogenics, civil engineering, infrastructure….) • Task force ILC-CLIC cost study (identical methods, identify cost drivers and differences,….) • Contribution to ILC workshops: • KEK: Nov 13-15, 2004 • Snowmass: August 14-27, 2005 • ILC- MoU

More Related