1 / 41

It's A ll in What You Ask: Techniques for Enhancing Reflection and Learning in an Online Course

It's A ll in What You Ask: Techniques for Enhancing Reflection and Learning in an Online Course. Karen Diaz Nancy O’Hanlon LOEX Conference, April 2010. Agenda. Describe several techniques for encouraging metacognition and improving student learning.

nituna
Download Presentation

It's A ll in What You Ask: Techniques for Enhancing Reflection and Learning in an Online Course

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. It's All in What You Ask: Techniques for Enhancing Reflection and Learning in an Online Course Karen Diaz Nancy O’Hanlon LOEX Conference, April 2010

  2. Agenda • Describe several techniques for encouraging metacognition and improving student learning. • Discuss how we used these techniques in an online course to enhance understanding of a difficult concept. • Demonstrate methods that you could apply in your own teaching.

  3. Clicker Test: Are you really in the right room today? • Yes • Probably • Not sure • No, but too embarrassed to leave now. Answer Now

  4. Speed kills . . . brain cells! "Deep log studies show that, from undergraduates to professors, people exhibit a strong tendency towards shallow, horizontal, 'flicking' behaviour in digital libraries. Society is dumbing down." Information Behaviour of the Researcher of the Future, 2008. http://www.ucl.ac.uk/infostudies/research/ciber/downloads/ggexecutive.pdf

  5. Fostering Habits of Reflection • We teach students to skim and make snap judgments about quality. • Reflection requires more time and conscious effort.

  6. Why? Improved Outcomes • Learning is enhanced when students engage in metacognitive activities such as self-assessment and monitoring (Lin, 2001). • Self-monitoring is particularly important in Web-based environments. • Tools or features prompting students to reflect on learning were effective in improving outcomes (Means et al, 2009).

  7. How? Prompts • Prompts (questions) are an important tool for encouraging reflection. • Prompts that ask students to assess what they understand and where they should direct additional effort were effective in research studies on information skills (Stadtler, 2007; Wopereis, 2008).

  8. How? Process Modeling • Lin (1999) notes that “reflective thinking involves actively monitoring, evaluating, and modifying one’s thinking and comparing it to both expert models and peers.” • Pace & Middendorf (2004) suggest that instructors can help students overcome learning obstacles (bottlenecks)by reflecting in depth on the steps an expert would take to accomplish a particular task and then modeling it for students. 

  9. Techniques: Summary

  10. Reflection 1 Think about your own teaching experiences. Is there a concept or skill that your students find particularly difficult to grasp? How could you provide opportunities for students to assess their own progress?

  11. Our Approach: Action Research

  12. New Course Content: Movie Recognizing Bias: • Providesa definition of bias. • Offers a rationale for learning the skill of assessing bias. • Introduces a cognitive strategy, represented as a mnemonic, MAPit. 

  13. Modeling the Process

  14. Deconstructing the Message

  15. Recognizing Bias Movie http://liblearn.osu.edu/movies/bias.htm

  16. New Course Content: Quiz • Recall: 4 multiple choice questions that assess recall of content from the movie. • Application: 2 multiple choice questions with links to websites, to assess students’ ability to apply the MAPit strategy. • Reflection: 2 open ended questions (metacognitive prompts) intended to encourage reflection by students.

  17. Bias Quiz Knowledge • Question 1 (no change from Autumn 2008 to Winter 2009) • The letters MAP in the MAPit strategy for recognizing bias stand for: • Medium, Audience, Purpose • Message, Author, Purpose • Message, Audience, Practicality

  18. Bias Quiz Knowledge • Question 2 (no change from Autumn 2008 to Winter 2009) • Worthwhile factors to consider in analyzing a message for bias are whether it is: (Select ALL correct options) • Fact or opinion • Sources cited or not cited • Right or wrong • Fair or selective

  19. Bias Quiz Comprehension • Question 3 (no change from Autumn 2008 to Winter 2009) • Why does an author's credibility matter when looking for bias? • 1) Authors with deep knowledge of a field, and who have withstood scrutiny of reviewers, are less likely to be biased. • 2) Authors who have been reviewed a lot are likely to say what they think the reviewers want to hear, so may be more biased. • 3) Authors who are new to a field bring an important fresh perspective that is less likely to be biased.

  20. Bias Quiz Comprehension • Question 4 (no change from Autumn 2008 to Winter 2009) • What factors can help you determine if the purpose of a publication is partisan? (Select ALL that apply) • Where it gets its funding • How many members it has • It's own mission statement • Who is on its board of directors

  21. Bias Quiz Application • Question 5 (no change from Autumn 2008 to Winter 2009) • Using the strategies described in the movie, connect to the following site and analyze it for bias. Drug Policy Alliance • Which statement is most true about this site? • 1) It is unbiased • 2) It  is biased • 3) It is commercial

  22. Bias Quiz Application • Question 6 (no change from Autumn 2008 to Winter 2009) • Using the strategies described in the movie, connect to the following site and analyze it for bias. Who's Watching What You Eat? • Which statement is most true about this site? • 1) It is unbiased • 2) It  is biased • 3) It is commercial

  23. Bias Quiz Reflection • Question 7 (Autumn 2008) • How well do you understand what is needed and how prepared do you feel to recognize bias in other information you encounter?  • (To receive credit, your answer must include at least one complete and clear sentence.)

  24. Bias Quiz Reflection • Question 7 (Winter 2009) • How well do you understand what is needed and how prepared do you feel to recognize bias in other information you encounter?  • 1) I understand the concepts related to, and feel confident that I will be able to recognize bias in all other information sources. • 2) I understand the concepts needed to recognize bias, but think it may still be difficult to recognize bias in some information sources. • 3) Not all the concepts related to recognizing bias are easy for me, and am not confident in my ability to recognize bias in all information sources. • 4) I do not feel prepared at all to recognize bias in information sources.

  25. Bias Quiz Reflection • Question 8 (Autumn 2008) • What do you think you should do to improve your own abilities for recognizing bias?  • (To receive credit, your answer must include at least one complete and clear sentence.)

  26. Bias Quiz Reflection • Question 8 (Winter 2009) • What do you think you should do to improve your own abilities for recognizing bias?  • 1) I need to remember to apply the MAPit strategy in the future. • 2) There are one or two elements in the MAPit strategy that I know are challenging for me, and need to pay attention to those when I try to detect bias. • 3) I need to pay more attention to elements from information sources (such as author credentials, or "about us" links). • 4) I should spend time practicing going to web sites and applying the MAPit strategy to get good at it.

  27. Bias Quiz - Reflection

  28. Capstone Application • Question 8 (Autumn 2008 and Winter 2009) • What is the PRIMARY purpose of this site? (Pick one option below and type it into the answer box): • Advocacy (sway opinion or get support for a cause) • Reference/Information (provide balanced view of a topic) • Commercial (sell a product; offer product support)

  29. Capstone Application • Question 11 (Autumn 2008 and Winter 2009) • Evaluation of Web Sites--Content Bias/Balance • An advocacy site may attempt to sway the reader's view one way or another, while a reference/information site will provide a balanced, objective look at the topic. Examine some of the pages on the site before answering the following questions. • Also, remember the MAPit strategy for recognizing bias that wasintroduced in the movie you viewed during week three.  Be sure to consider these factors when you make a decision. • Choose the best description of the site's content from the options listed below.. • Biased (slanted) • Balanced (objective)

  30. Capstone Analysis • Question 24 (Autumn 2008 and Winter 2009) • Write a paragraph covering all of the points listed below. Use complete sentences. Your answer will be judged on accuracy, clarity of expression, and completeness. • For the site that you found with your search (Questions 22, 23), indicate: • Who is the author? Provide some background information about the author. • What is the purpose of this site? Find a statement of purpose on the site and quote from it. • When was this site last updated? Indicate where you found this information. • Does the site's content appear balanced (objective) or biased (slanted)? Provide support for your answer.

  31. Bias Quiz - Performance

  32. Capstone - Performance

  33. Capstone – Qualitative look at Performance • Case Studies • Terminology • Reflective • MAPit (instructed)

  34. Applied to another course • Provide students with an article to read • How We Failed the Net Generation by William Badke • Quiz them over it

  35. Article Quiz Comprehension • Question 1 • This article critiques the current state of information literacy and offers suggestions to improve information literacy education.  Who is the intended audience of this article? • a) Those teaching information literacy at the University level. • b) University students trying to understand information literacy. • c) Those teaching information literacy at the K-12 level.

  36. Article Quiz Knowledge • Question 2 • Why might a library database present a better alternative to Google? • a) Library materials are reviewed and regulated. In contrast, no one checks the reliability of Web pages. • b) Libraries are better funded than most Web pages. Therefore, they are more accurate. • c) The author states that Google is the best way to search for library materials.

  37. Article Quiz Knowledge • Question 3 • Where does the author think students learn most of their Internet search skills? • a) At home. • b) At their hometown libraries. • c) In their K-12 education.

  38. Article Quiz Knowledge • Question 4 • Why does the author think it is important to teach stronger Web search skills? • a) In the author's opinion, the Web is really only good for finding music or blogs. • b) Information provided by search engines is limited and often lacking precision when compared to library databases. • c) The author is a librarian and wants to promote libraries.

  39. Article Quiz Reflection Question 5 After reading this article, pick which of the following assumptions the author makes that you MOST agree with:

  40. Your Turn to Reflect • I understand what reflective questions look like and will be able to apply them to my assignments. • I need to know more about the use of reflection and metacognition before trying to use it. • I will probably never build reflective questioning into my assignments. • I feel something different than any of these alternatives.

  41. References • Lin, X., Hmelo, C., Kinzer, C.K., & Secules, T.J. (1999). Designing technology to support reflection. Educational Technology Research and Development47 (3), 43-62. •  Lin, X. (2001).  Designing metacognitive activities. Educational Technology Research and Development49, 23-40. • Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2009). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Dept. of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development. Retrieved from: http://www.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-based-practices/finalreport.pdf • Pace, D. & Middendorf, J. (Eds.) (2004). Decoding the disciplines: Helping students learn disciplinary ways of thinking. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 98. San Francisco: Jossey Bass. • Stadtler, M. & Bromme, R. (2008).  Effects of the metacognitive computer-tool met.a.ware on the web search of laypersons.  Computers in Human Behavior24 (3), 716-37. • Wopereis, I., Brand-Gruwel, S., & Vermetten, Y. (2008).  The effect of embedded instruction on solving information problems. Computers in Human Behavior24 (3), 738-52.

More Related