1 / 34

World Development

World Development. The Theories. Modernisation Theory. What stages of development did we have to go through?. The History of Modernisation Theory. World War 2 ends… Countries are freed from colonial rule The Cold War begins

niles
Download Presentation

World Development

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. World Development The Theories

  2. Modernisation Theory • What stages of development did we have to go through?

  3. The History of Modernisation Theory • World War 2 ends… • Countries are freed from colonial rule • The Cold War begins • Modernisation is the economic theory encouraged to those aligned with the west for development

  4. Walt Rostow (1960) – The evolutionary ladder

  5. How does modernisation help? • Financial assistance can kick start the economies of developing countries – Stimulus packages • But…this does not come without conditions • Capitalist values must be taken on by the country and capitalist systems introduced

  6. But what was wrong with the way we were? • Modernisation stresses internal blocks to development • Traditional Values • High Birth Rates • Lack of Skills • Lack of infrastructure and institutions • Lack of technology

  7. Why is capitalism better? • The wider state over the community • The ability to succeed as an individual – What McClelland (1961) refers to as ‘the need for achievement’ in his The Achieving Society. • The ‘cough’ ability to transcend social barriers • Hoselite (1952) – cities are key • They are centres passing on social and cultural developments • Allow for a centralised workforce • Transport links • Inkles (1997) – Media as an agent of development

  8. Does it work? • Rostow predicted China and India would develop to the stage they are at now during this timeframe • We still use development aid • But…African countries (and others) have received large amounts of development aid and have failed to develop

  9. Ethnocentric • It is an ethnocentric theory – It judges other cultures by the values of western civilization • It devalues traditional values and promotes western ones

  10. Other Criticisms • It assumes that every country has the natural resources for industrial expansion • The investment in the economy often benefits the rich and not the poor (although there is supposed to be a trickle down effect) • It ignores historical context • The internal ‘blocks’ to development may be because of a lack of development not the cause of it

  11. Consolidation • Do you agree? • How could you describe this theory in terms of a smaller human relationship? i.e. between a parent and child, husband and wife etc • Create 5 revision cards • One summarising Modernisation theory • One for Rostow • One for Hoselite • One for Inkles • One for McCelland

  12. Traditional Marxism • Agrees that capitalism is the way forward for development • Disagrees with the distribution of wealth • Beyond modernisation there is a socialist next stage • Bill Warren (1980) – Capitalism is working to develop countries it is just happening slower than expected and being hindered by some misguided policies.

  13. Dependency Theory • Dependency Theory focuses on historical factors • It sees the problem as external (caused by the developed countries) rather than internal (caused by failings in the developing countries)

  14. Colonialism – Mercantile Era

  15. Colonialism – Direct political control and the slave trade

  16. The British Empire

  17. Colonialism – Neo-Colonialism • Although we have let many subject nations become independent we still retain a huge amount of political and economic control • Capitalism is based on exploitation – the west exploits the LEDCs to further its own ends • We benefit from the poverty and lack of development in third world countries • We buy off a countries elites who then exploit the population

  18. Andre Gunder Frank (1969) • Studies the Latin American Economy • Concludes that the development of the first world is reliant on the underdevelopment of the third world

  19. Satellites/periphery nations (Reliant third world nations) Metropolis/core (Centre in the developed world)

  20. Why does this mean that modernisation theory is rubbish? • As the first world was developing it was never exploited • It ignores the historical context and continuing legacy of colonialism • For more see Potter on the next slide!

  21. Potter (2000) • Developing countries policies are not internal but dictated by outside demands (by core/metropolis) • Because the country was ruled for so long they have experience of democracy • Western powers have left a legacy legitimising force to quell uprisings • The skilled workers in society were never native so when the western powers left so did the skilled workforce • Colonialism leaves behind the idea of western invincibility

  22. Pre-western influence Benin Empire (in modern day Nigeria)

  23. Incans

  24. What do they need to do to develop? • Keep out foreign capital • Isolate and become self sufficient • Break away when the core/metropolis is weak • Avoid capitalism

  25. Criticisms • It is very pessimistic with no view of real development ever being possible • It does not give a guide to realistic action • It ignores the internal factors

  26. Consolidation • Do you agree? • How could you describe this theory in terms of a smaller human relationship? i.e. between a parent and child, husband and wife etc • Create 3 revision cards • 1 for dependency theory • 1 for Gunder-Frank • 1 for Potter

  27. World Systems Theory • Develops from the work of Immanuel Wallerstein 1970s • Based on dependency perspective • The factors influencing development are external but not a single individual country but the system itself • But…if a country is producing a desired commodity it can move up forcing other countries down • There will always be under developed countries which are taken advantage of

  28. World Systems cont. • There is a modern world system in which countries move up and down not simply core and periphery but semi-peripheral (these countries have developed and un-developed areas) • It is a dynamic system with upwards and downwards movement • Globalisation of capitalism

  29. Criticisms • Still no answer to overcome the problem • Deterministic • No internal factors – corruption

  30. The Theory Impasse • David Booth (1985) Old Theories are no longer adequate • Modernisation cannot explain slow progress • Dependency cannot account for rapid growth of Asian Tigers • Communism’s end shows that traditional Marxism fails • Postmodernism emerges and there is no longer a single metanarrative

  31. Neo-Liberalism • The new official theory of the 1980’s • There are internal blocks – economic institutions which inhibit development • Without these being removed capitalism cannot develop

  32. Neo-Liberalism cont. • Increase the importance of capitalism values and reduce the value of the state • Sell off public assets to private sector • Stop government interference in economy • Reduce state spending • Cut taxed to allow more spending • Remove blocks on imports exports to allow integration in global economy

  33. How it is imposed? • Voluntary – as in the UK • Structural adjustment programs imposed by the IMF and World Bank as part of the Washington Consensus (1989)

  34. Has it worked? • It appears to in China and India • Where it has not the policies have not been properly introduced • On the other hand…The Centre for Economic and Policy Research (study carried out by Weisbrot et al. 2001) – found there was less growth from 1980-2000 than there had been between 1960-1980

More Related