1 / 42

GEARING UP FOR ENHANCED BASIC EDUCATION (K to 12)

GEARING UP FOR ENHANCED BASIC EDUCATION (K to 12). DepED Vision. We dream of Filipinos who passionately love their country and whose values and competencies enable them to realize their full potential and contribute meaningfully to building the nation.

nicole-head
Download Presentation

GEARING UP FOR ENHANCED BASIC EDUCATION (K to 12)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. GEARING UP FOR ENHANCED BASIC EDUCATION (K to 12)

  2. DepED Vision We dream of Filipinos who passionately love their country and whose values and competencies enable them to realize their full potential and contribute meaningfully to building the nation. As a learner-centered public institution, the Department of Education consistently improves itself to better serve its stakeholders. -2013

  3. DepED Mission To protect and promote the right of every Filipino to quality, equitable, culture-based and complete basic education where: • Students learn in a child-friendly, gender-sensitive, safe and motivating environment • Teachers facilitate learning and constantly nurture every learner -2013

  4. Administrators and staff, as stewards of the institution, ensure an enabling and supportive environment for effective learning to happen. • Family, community and other stakeholders are actively engaged and share responsibility for developing life-long learners. -2013

  5. DepED Core Values -2013

  6. PHASED IMPLEMENTATION OF K TO 12 October 2010-May 2012 June 2012-May 2016 June 2016-May 2018 June 2018-May 2023 Grades 11 and 12 implementation in public schools Migration of Grade 1 and 7 (roll forward) Complete migration of K to 12 basic education curriculum Universal Kinder Implementation SHS Modeling Enactment of Universal Kindergarten Law Complete migration to new elementary curriculum including Grades 5 and 6 Enactment of K to 12 Basic Education Law K to 12 Basic Education Program Social Development Committee—Cabinet Level Meeting/ August 15, 2011

  7. Transition • The DepED, the CHED and the TESDA shall formulate the appropriate strategies and mechanisms needed • to ensure smooth transition from 10 TO K to 12 cycle. • The strategies may cover changes in: • physical infrastructure • manpower • organizational and structural concerns • bridging models linking grade 10 competencies, • -entry requirements of new tertiary curricula, and --_partnerships between the government and other entities.

  8. Transition • Modeling for senior high school will be implemented • in selected schools to simulate the transition • process and provide concrete data for the transition • plan. • DepEd shall engage in partnerships with HEI and • TVIs for the utilization of the latter’s human and • physical resources.

  9. Transition • The faculty of HEIs and TVIs allowed to teach students of secondary education shall be given priority in hiring for the duration of the transition period.

  10. Sec. 7

  11. RA No. 10533 or Enhanced Basic Education Act : full enhancement and lengthening of Basic Education in the country • School Year 2016-2017 – official implementation of SHS nationwide • Core Curriculum and Tracks - Academic - Technical-Vocational-Livelihood - Sports and Arts

  12. FY 2015 BUDGET PLANNING CYCLE & PRE-PLANNING FOR SHS • The Department was able to start transitioning into a more strategic, bottom-up budgeting approach for FY 2014 • By the end of 2013 – Preparations and planning were done in the Central, Regional and Division Offices • January – April 2014 – plan consolidation and budget requirements • SHS Planning Guide – starting point and input for Regions and Divisions to go through the DepED Planning Process for FY 2015

  13. GEARING UP FOR SHS IMPLEMENTATION • Conduct internal and external assessment to ensure proper understanding of supply and demand • Assessments’ important factors: internal & absorptive capacities and market realities • Assessments are the foundation of the Infrastructure Plan

  14. 5 POLICY DECISIONS • SHS Curriculum – Technical Panels, Programs & Projects - will be finalized by November - will provide specific on: a. number of hours for the core curriculum b. Curriculum by track c. Strands per track d. Facility requirements e. Equipment requirements

  15. 5 POLICY DECISIONS 2. Non-DepED SHS Guidelines - Programs and Projects - will guide the non-DepED schools in transitioning to SHS or in their decision to offer SHS - will guide partnership creation and pave way for clear arrangements with with potential external providers

  16. 5 POLICY DECISIONS 3. Voucher Policy – Finance and Administrations - will be the DepED’s mechanism to implement publicly funded and privately managed SHS - allow the DepED to utilize available capacity in non-DepED schools instead of immediately building more schools during the transition years from 2016- 2020

  17. 5 POLICY DECISIONS 4. Grade 10 Certificate, Grade 12 Certificate/Diploma and TESD Implications– EXECOM and ProgCom - will affect demand for SHS and is still being reviewed

  18. 5 POLICY DECISIONS 5. Criteria for locating DepED SHS- Regional Operations - will depend on whether the SHS will be an existing school or in a new school - Factors to consider: a. Internal capacity of the school b. Strategic location, accessibility, commute time, and distance c. Potential partnerships and potential demand creation d. Whether certain existing schools can still accommodate more enrolment

  19. 5 POLICY DECISIONS e. Locating potential new school sites f. Faculty availability g. Facility requirement and revisiting classroom

  20. INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL ASSESSMENTS Primary objectives: • To start creating operational plan at the regional/division level for elements we can determine now • To provide tools in creating demand projections and necessary supply for SHS provision • To start actively engaging external stakeholders, who are crucial partners in implementing SHS

  21. TIMELINE & ACTION STEPS

  22. SHS PRE-PLANNING INTEGRATED WITH THE FY 2015 PLANNING CYCLE

  23. SHS PRE-PLANNING INTEGRATED WITH THE FY 2015 PLANNING CYCLE

  24. SHS IMPLEMENTATION ROADMAP TO 2016

  25. KEY QUESTIONS FOR INTERNAL ASSESSMENT

  26. SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL PROJECTIONS (Pro) TOOL

  27. OTHER DATA & ACTION STEPS Refer to ASEC Reynaldo D. Laguda’s letter to ICT Coordinators (next slide)

  28. BUILDABLE SPACE Table C of Gov’t. Elementary School Profile for the EBEIS, is the buildable space viable for building SHS? Can each school still absorb incremental enrolment? Identify a list of existing schools with buildable space that are viable for SHS placement while considering factors like present enrolment, classroom deterioration, disaster risks, etc.

  29. POTENTIAL NEW SCHOOL SITES Are there potential new school sites where the Department can build SHS? Are these areas optimal and in good proximity to our learners? Tabulate the following data

  30. KEY QUESTIONS FOR EXTERNAL ASSESSMENT

  31. SPECIFIC QUESTIONS TO EXTERNAL STAKEHOLDERS?

More Related