New qos measures for routing and wavelength assignment in wdm networks
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 14

New QoS Measures for Routing and Wavelength Assignment in WDM Networks PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 46 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

New QoS Measures for Routing and Wavelength Assignment in WDM Networks. Shi Zhong Xu and Kwan L. Yeung Dep. Of EE, The Univ. of Hong Kong ICC’2002. Example 1: Mesh-Torus Network. The Disadvantages of OABP Measurement.

Download Presentation

New QoS Measures for Routing and Wavelength Assignment in WDM Networks

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


New qos measures for routing and wavelength assignment in wdm networks

New QoS Measures for Routing and Wavelength Assignment in WDM Networks

Shi Zhong Xu and Kwan L. Yeung

Dep. Of EE, The Univ. of Hong Kong

ICC’2002


Example 1 mesh torus network

Example 1: Mesh-Torus Network


The disadvantages of oabp measurement

The Disadvantages of OABP Measurement

  • The overall average blocking probability (OABP) is not a good performance measure.

    • It hides the information of service deviation among node pairs.

    • It does not consider the revenue generated by different types of calls.


Example 1 mesh torus network continued

Example 1: Mesh-Torus Network (continued)


Example 2 shufflenet

Example 2: ShuffleNet


Example 2 shufflenet continued

Example 2: ShuffleNet continued)


Requirements for a new qos measure

Requirements for A New QoS Measure

  • Unbiased.

  • Make reference to the individual requirements of SD pairs.

  • One-sided.

  • Take the potential revenue into consideration.


New performance measure

New Performance Measure

  • B*ij : QoS requirement of a SD pair ij.

  • λij : arrival rate for SD pair ij.

  • Λ = Σijλij.

  • The overall average blocking probability (OABP) is biven by


New performance measure continued

New Performance Measure (continued)

  • A new class of composite performance measures is designed as follows,

  • I is the set of node pairs with blocking probabilities exceeding their QoS requirements.

  • Lij is a punishing factor proportional to the shortest distance between nodes i and j.


New performance measure continued1

New Performance Measure (continued)

  • EB(1) can be considered as the weighted average excessive blocking.

  • EB(2) can be considered as the mean square weighted excessive blocking.


Case studies

Case Studies

  • Least-loaded routing (LLR).

  • Fixed path least congestion routing (FPLC).

  • New fixed path least congestion routing (NFPLC).

  • Fixed routing with random wavelength assignment (FR_RAND).

  • SPREAD routing based on layered graph (LG).


Case studies continued

Case Studies (continued)


Case studies continued1

Case Studies (continued)


Conclusion

Conclusion

  • A new class of composite measure EB(p) is proposed.

  • Compared with OABP, EB(p) is unbiased, makes reference to the QoS requirements, one-sided, and takes the potential revenue loss into consideration.


  • Login