1 / 13

WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR TRAVEL INFORMATION

WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR TRAVEL INFORMATION. Asad J. Khattak* Youngbin Yim^ Linda Stalker* *Department of City & Regional Plng. Univ. of North Carolina, Chapel Hill ^California PATH Program University of California at Berkeley. Importance. Incident & recurrent congestion

Download Presentation

WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR TRAVEL INFORMATION

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR TRAVEL INFORMATION Asad J. Khattak* Youngbin Yim^ Linda Stalker* *Department of City & Regional Plng. Univ. of North Carolina, Chapel Hill ^California PATH Program University of California at Berkeley

  2. Importance • Incident & recurrent congestion • Data collection, processing & dissemination • Are people willing to pay for high quality info? • Public versus private resources • Field Operational Tests & deployment: TravInfo • Traveler Advisory Telephone System

  3. Literature Real-time travel info in large US cities: • Electronic information increases shifting • Information valuable in uncertain travel conditions • Info content, quality and medium • Travelers willing to pay in certain “high benefit” situations • TravInfo, SmartTraveler, Travlink

  4. Gaps In existing studies: • Factors that influence willingness-to-pay for travel info? • What kind of info will users pay for? • Is there demand for transit info? • What can we learn from FOT/implementations in larger cities?

  5. The Survey • CATI: April 1997 of TATS callers • Sample = 511 (quota for traffic & transit calls; gender) • Sample comparisons showed differences--non-generalizable • Information seekers • Focus on trip called (TATS) about: • Different purposes • Skip patterns

  6. Survey Questions Reported & Stated preferences • RP: Last month, how frequently did you call TATS? • SP scenarios: About how many times will you call TATS if per-call charge was 25 cents, 50 cents, 1 dollar? • Give per call or monthly fee preference Other variables: • Travel decisions, socio-economic and context factors

  7. Methodology Random-effects negbin reg. • Dependent variable is • RP: Calling frequency (1) • SP: Calling frequency (6) • Indep. Vars: Per-call fee, individual, household, travel characteristics • Potential biases: • Strategic bias--lose free service • Non-commitment bias--overstate W-T-P • Cognitive dissonance--unable to assess free service’s worth

  8. Methodology - Model Estimated model accounts for: • Serial correlation • Over-dispersion • Heterogeneity (when mean variance ratio grows with higher means) • Does not yield marginal effects Skip patterns: • Missing data problem • Indicator variables

  9. Selected Results

  10. Selected Results

  11. Conclusions • Response reasonable: Higher cost implies less use • Controlling for various factors & combining RP with SP • Information seekers willing to pay • Demand for personalized information • Other info sources complementary • Potential for transit improvement

  12. Policy Implications Commercialization of travel info: • There is demand for TATS • Added benefits of personalization imp. to customers • Advertise TATS on comm. radio • TATS usage may grow (SmartTraveler) • In other areas: • Develop free-of-charge service • Gradually introduce charges: Longer commute routes & improvement potential

  13. Directions for Further Research • Content of information • New media: Internet, PDA • Integration of info • Behavioral change • Network performance

More Related