1 / 10

Choosing The Right MLP Fund As Oil Slides

http://www.infracapmlp.com/ - The state of the energy market today is the best of times and the worst of times for master limited partnership ETFs.

mlpetf
Download Presentation

Choosing The Right MLP Fund As Oil Slides

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Choosing The Right MLP Fund As Oil Slides

  2. The state of the energy market today is the best of times and the worst of times for master limited partnership ETFs. • MLPs are vehicles that pass the income earned in some form of partnership directly to investors. By design, they can only be used for businesses where 90 percent or more of the revenue is being generated from qualifying activities, such as managing natural gas pipelines or storing crude oil. These are industries that generate steady income streams, but that also require large investments in infrastructure that need to be depreciated over long periods of time.

  3. ETFs that invest in MLPs are hugely popular with investors looking for income generation, and for tax management tools. But when it comes to MLP ETFs, their returns can vary dramatically. They each respond differently to commodity prices, industry developments, the amount of leverage used by the MLPs, etc.

  4. In the current environment, with crude down by roughly half since last summer and inventories nearing a glut as U.S. production nears all-time records, the dispersion between the best-performing MLP ETF and the worst-performing in the past six months is 30 percentage points. If you go back an entire year, the difference in total returns between the best and the worst nears 43 percentage points.

  5. The Yorkville High Income MLP ETF (YMLP)—the worst-performing MLP ETF in the past year in a segment with 25 strategies—tracks an index of MLPs weighted in tiers based on their yield. The fund is structured as a C-corporation to get around the rule that open-ended ended funds can't hold more than 25 percent of their portfolios in MLPs. That structure means that distributions are taxed first at the corporate level before being passed on to investors.

  6. By design, YMLP's yield-focused tiered weighting scheme boosts yield relative to the broader segment, but it also gives the fund a drastic small-cap tilt. That tilt has not paid off during oil’s recent plunge, as smaller names feel the pinch of falling energy prices faster than bigger companies. • The yield focus has also likely contributed to poor recent performance. Higher yield often goes hand in hand with higher risk from a total return perspective. Consider that YMLP is paying 13.06 percent in distribution yields due to its approach.

  7. Still, YMLP’s yield is driven higher by its falling share price—much like with bonds, distribution yield goes up when prices go down. YMLP’s yield in dollars on a per-share basis has fallen since 2013. • ’40 Act ‘MLP’ Funds • By comparison, the First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure ETF (EMLP), meanwhile, is one of the only actively managed ETFs in the space, and it’s not structured as a C-corporation, but as a traditional 1940’s Act fund.

  8. That distinction translates into a portfolio that has limitations on its allocation to MLPs, so EMLP also invests in pipelines and utilities structured as C-corporations, Canadian firms that used to be royalty trusts, and unique institutional MLP shares issued by MLP affiliates, ETF.com data show. In other words, just 25 percent of its portfolio can be allocated to MLPs, meaning it's not a pure MLP play. • That diversification within the portfolio has provided downside protection in recent months. EMLP’s performance has also been buoyed by a large stake in Kinder Morgan Inc., a firm that abandoned the MLP structure in favor of a corporate structure, which allowed it to be a constituent in EMLP but barred it from pure-play MLP ETFs. • EMLP is shelling out a distribution yield of about 3.3 percent over 12 months.

  9. You should own the ETN structure if: • You expect the majority of total return to come from price appreciation. • You are using a tax-deferred account and cannot benefit from the tax deferral of the ETF structure. • You have a shorter time horizon. • You place a high value on transparency and predictable returns. • You are unconcerned about the credit risk of the note. • You are more concerned with total return than after-tax yield.

  10. Contact us • Website : http://www.infracapmlp.com/about/fund-profile.html • Address: • InfraCap MLP ETFETFis Series Trust I,6 E. 39th Street,10th FloorNew York, NY 10016 • 212-593-43831-888-383-4184 (toll free) • info@etfis.com

More Related