1 / 10

Beyond Science and Decisions: Problem Formulation to Dose Response

Beyond Science and Decisions: Problem Formulation to Dose Response. Beyond Science and Decisions, Problem Formulation to Dose Response. Stakeholder Process. ARA* Process. Steering Committee. 25 Groups: Led by Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ). Risk Document Development.

Download Presentation

Beyond Science and Decisions: Problem Formulation to Dose Response

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Beyond Science and Decisions: Problem Formulation to Dose Response

  2. Beyond Science and Decisions, Problem Formulation to Dose Response Stakeholder Process ARA* Process Steering Committee 25 Groups: Led by Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) Risk Document Development Training and Certification Workshop 1 Report Available Non-profit Collaborators Risk Communication Workshop Reports 2 & 3 Expected January & May 2011 Risk Research And Tools Methods Text Expected Summer 2011 Risk Information Exchange (RiskIE) Peer Review & Consult All information To be web posted * Alliance for Risk Assessment (ARA): www.allianceforrisk.org

  3. Workshop Series Objectives • Additionally develop content of the NAS (2008) report on improving the risk assessment process to develop practical guidance for: • Risk assessment techniques applicable to specific issue identification (e.g., prioritization, screening and full assessment); • Use by risk managers at a variety of levels (e.g., states, regional managers, people in a variety of agencies, and in the private sector) • Implement a multi-stakeholder approach to share information, ideas and techniques in support of developing practical problem-driven risk assessment guidance.

  4. Specific Workshop Objectives • Identify useful dose-response techniques for specific issues, including: • Consideration of relevant data, • Characterization of assumptions, strengths and limitations, and • How the techniques address key considerations in the dose-response. • These techniques should appropriately reflect the: • Relevant biology and toxicology • Mode of action information, at a level of detail appropriate for the identified issue.

  5. Specific Workshop Objectives (continued) • Provide methods to explicitly address: • Human variability in cancer assessment, and • Enhance the consideration of human variability in noncancer assessment, including underlying diseases. • Identify methods for calculating the probability of response for noncancer endpoints. • Develop guidance for regulators and scientists for applying selected dose-response techniques.

  6. Workshop Approach • Workshop 1: Presentations that highlight relevant work in issue identification and assessment methods, followed by brainstorming on purpose-focused methods and selection of case studies. [Talks from March 16–18, 2010 meeting & report now available.] • Workshop 2 (October/November, 2010): Case study presentations and evaluation by science panel selected by ARA Steering Committee • Workshop 3 (April, 2011): Panel builds consensus on purpose-specific dose-response methods

  7. Why is this Approach Useful? • Multi-stakeholder approach, with input from experts in risk assessment, biology/toxicology, and mathematical analysis • Case-studies to test principles and methods against real-world data & review by expert panel • Integration of risk management-driven problem formulation with mode of action and biology • Methods covering a range of • problem formulations, • risk management needs, and • informed by state-of-the science guidance and frameworks

  8. Path Forward • Workshop 1 participants evaluated and recommended case study proposals, including new proposals. Case studies are listed at www.allianceforrisk.org/workshop/selections.htm • Summaries of breakout group discussions and suggestions for team members will be posted at http://www.allianceforrisk.org/Workshop/Workshop1MeetingReport.doc • Case study leaders are currently assembling teams; additional participants are welcome. • Additional case studies may also be brought forward to the second workshop

  9. How Can You Participate? • Participate in a case study or bring forward a new one • Participate in workshops 2 or 3, either in person or via webcast • Be a sponsor of the workshop series

  10. For More Information • Please visit www.allianceforrisk.org • TCEQ Workshop series contact: • Michael Dourson, Dourson@tera.org • Roberta Grant, Rgrant@tceq.state.tx.us • Lynne Haber, Haber@tera.org • Michael Honeycutt, MHoneycu@tceq.state.tx.us

More Related