1 / 38

Chlorine-36 Production in the Atmosphere

Chlorine-36 Production in the Atmosphere. Presentor: Jeannie Bryson. Summary. Introduction Production Mechanisms Production Rates Calculations Case Studies Questions. Introduction:Chlorine-36 . Radionuclide with half life = 301 ka

medea
Download Presentation

Chlorine-36 Production in the Atmosphere

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Chlorine-36 Production in the Atmosphere Presentor: Jeannie Bryson

  2. Summary • Introduction • Production Mechanisms • Production Rates • Calculations • Case Studies • Questions

  3. Introduction:Chlorine-36 • Radionuclide with half life = 301 ka • “Conservative” tracer with large range for dating old ground waters • Unlike 14C which requires significant geochemical interpretation

  4. Introduction: Reactions • Primary-Ray Reactions • 40Ar+p36Cl+a • Major reaction of atmospheric production • 36Ar+n 36Cl+p • Almost negligible • Secondary Ray Reaction • 35Cl+n 36Cl+a • Nuclear Reaction • 40Ca+π- 36Cl+a

  5. Production Mechanisms • Cosmic Ray • Both atmospheric and surface interactions • Natural Radioactivity • Radioactive decay • Nuclear Activity • Anthropogenic, recent nuclear tests

  6. Production Mechanisms • Atmospheric Production • Source: Primary and Secondary Cosmic-Ray bombardment of heavier elements • 36Cl produced mainly by spallation by high energy protons and less by neutron adsorption

  7. Production Mechanisms • Nuclear Activity • 1950’s-1960’s: High neutron flux iradiated marine aerosols such as 40Ca, 36Ar, and especially 35Cl. • Creates “bomb pulse” • Important near ocean and confined waters

  8. Production Rates • Rate at which each reaction occurs controlled by: • Intensity of the incident radiation • Reaction cross sections • Example: 36Ar reaction occurs at small rates due to its cross section (Andrews, et al 1994)

  9. Production Rates • Flashback: Altitude Dependency • High energy cosmic-ray flux low, low energy flux increases as high energy decreases and produces more low energy rays • Peak occurs at altitude=20km • Low energy flux decreases exponentially

  10. Production Rates • Closer Look at the Atmosphere Source:http://csep10.phys.utk.edu/astr161/lect/earth/atmosphere.html

  11. Production Rates • Altitude Dependency • Most production occurs in the stratosphere • Around 40% occurs in the troposphere (Bird et al. 1991)

  12. Production Rates • Latitude Dependency Rate controlled by Cosmic Flux Cosmic Flux controlled by magnetic field Rate controlled by geomagnetic latitude • Dependency decreased by atmospheric mixing • Example: Greenland rates are 3-5 X’s higher than predicted

  13. Production Rate

  14. Production Rate • Solar Activity • Controls production inversely • However, 36Cl varies form 14C and 10Be • Relationship not fully understood

  15. Production Rate • Nuclear Activity • Greenland Ice Core • 500 x’s greater than natural 36Cl deposition • Fallout varies w/ latitude-must be assessed for each site

  16. Production Rate • Seasonal Variations • Increased Production in Spring (Hainsworth, et al 1994) • Why?? • 1.) tropopause rises in spring allowing 36Cl to be added into troposphere and “scavenged” • 2.) increase in cosmic-ray penetration into troposphere

  17. Calculations • 36Cl/Cl Ratio • Ratio of 36Cl annual fallout to Cl- in annual precipitation • Useful because it is not sensitive to ET but it is affected by “ancient” chloride addition (Davis, et al. 1996)

  18. Calculations • 36Cl/Cl Ratio • R (36Cl/Cl) = 1854*F/[Clp]*P • F=36Cl fall-out (atoms m-2 s-1) • Clp=Cl- in precipitation • P=mean annual precipitation • [Cl]gw = [Cl]p*P/(P-E) • E=Evapotranspiration

  19. Calculations • 36Clflux: Variation of deposition flux with time • V=Volume (liters) collected in 1 m2 area during sampling period • D=length (days) of sampling period Source: Hainsworth, et al. 1994

  20. Case Study Example:Maryland Source: Hainsworth, et al. 1994

  21. Case Study Example:Maryland Source: Hainsworth, et al. 1994

  22. Case Study Example:Maryland Source: Hainsworth, et al. 1994

  23. Case Study Example:Canadian Shield • Ability to measure low concentrations of 36Cl with AMS opens door for many hydrological investigations • However, 36Cl interpretation is not always straight forward • Bomb 36Cl and 3H peaks do not correlate. Why? Source: Milton, et al. 2003

  24. Results – Water • Precipitation-very few measurements • Ice cores record that by 1975, 36Cl -> pre- bomb levels • Seasonal variability in 36Cl • Longitudinal effects? • Why is this important?? -“INITIAL VALUE” Source: Article

  25. “the initial value problem” • Latitude to estimate cosmogenic production • Precipitation-neglect anthropogenic component • Shallow ground-water • Desert soil profiles • Glacial ice cores • Isolated water Source: Davis et al (1998)

  26. Source: Article

  27. Results-Water • Groundwater Profiles (1993-1995) • Predict flow velocity • Recharge Conditions/Sources Source: Article

  28. Source: Article

  29. Vegetation • 36Cl decline in vegetation < Arctic Precip. • Decline also varies with species • Forested sites have larger inventory of 36Cl than previously expected

  30. Mass Balance • Bomb 36Cl < expected amount • Why?? 1.) Latitude-too large? 2.) wrong model 3.) fallout not uniform 4.) mysterious pool of 36Cl-organochloride emission from trees?

  31. Conclusions • 36Cl held in surface matter more than 3H • 36Cl is non-conservative in highly forested environments • Cannot assume steady state

  32. Questions?

  33. References • Andrews JN, Edmunds WM, Smedley PL, Fontes J-Ch, Fifield LK, Allan GL (1994) Chlorine-36 in groundwater as a paleoclimatic indicator: the East Midlands Triassic sandstone aquifer (UK). Earth and Planetary Science Letters 122: 159-171 • Bird JR, Davie RF, Chivas AR, Fifield LK, Ophel TR (1991) Chlorine-36 production and distribution in Australia. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 84: 299- 307 • Davis SN, Cecil D, Zreda M, Sharma P (1996) Chlorine-36 and the initial value problem. Hydrogeology Journal 6: 104-114 • Milton GM, Milton JCD, Schiff S, Cook P, Kotzer TG, Cecil LD (2003) Evidence for chlorine recycling-hydrosphere, biosphere, atmosphere-in a forested wet zone on the Canadian Shield. Applied Geochemistry 18: 1027-1042

More Related