Understanding individuals within environments
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 47

Understanding Individuals Within Environments PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 90 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Understanding Individuals Within Environments. Chapter 5. Activity?. Write down 2 classes you’ve taken that are very different. What skills did you need in order to be successful in that class? How did the different environments help you learn? Not help you learn?.

Download Presentation

Understanding Individuals Within Environments

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Understanding individuals within environments

Understanding Individuals Within Environments

Chapter 5


Activity

Activity?

  • Write down 2 classes you’ve taken that are very different.

  • What skills did you need in order to be successful in that class?

  • How did the different environments help you learn? Not help you learn?


6 models of ecological environment

6 Models of Ecological Environment

(1) Behavior Setting Analysis (Roger Barker)

(2) Activity Settings (O’Donnel, et al.)

(3) Ecological Metaphor (James Kelly)

(4) Social Climate Perspective (Rudolph Moos)

(5) Social Regularities (Edward Seidman)

(6) Environmntal Psychology


3 models of ecological environment

3 Models of Ecological Environment

(1) Behavior Setting Analysis (Roger Barker)

  • Discrete places

    (2) Ecological Metaphor (James Kelly)

  • Field Biology as Metaphor

    (3) Social Climate Perspective (Rudolph Moos)

  • Personality of the Environment


Model 1 behavior setting theory roger barker

Model 1: Behavior Setting Theory (Roger Barker)

  • Fundamental Question: “How do we understand stream of behavior that characterizes our everyday life?”

  • Eco-behavioral science independent of individuals

    • Discovery of rules that are minimally variable by context


One boy s day the evolution of a theory

One Boy’s Day: The Evolution of a Theory

  • Behavior setting as central concept

    • Behavior-environment synomorphy


Understanding individuals within environments

When in church,

we behave….


Understanding individuals within environments

When at a sporting event, we behave…


Circuits

Circuits

  • Circuits: mechanisms that guide adaptive behavior in settings, connect people to settings

  • 4 types of circuits

    • Program circuits

    • Goal circuits

    • Deviation-countering circuits

    • Vetoing circuits


Uses of behavior setting analysis

Uses of Behavior Setting Analysis

  • Providing portraits of what aspects of communities are important locally

    • # churches

    • # schools

    • # athletic facilities

  • Diagnosing community needs

    • What is missing?

      • Needed programs/organizations


Staffing theory

Staffing Theory

# people

Available behavior settings

  • Under-populated settings – Greater claims on people

    • Fewer people per setting

  • Over-populated settings – Less claim on people


Size matters big school small school

Size Matters: Big School/Small School

  • Study of 20 high schools in Kansas that differed in student population (range: 150-1800 students)

  • Begins with behavior setting survey

    • Classes

    • Extracurricular activities

    • Sports

      # of behavior settings

      # of students


Smaller schools

Smaller Schools

  • more involved in school activities

  • worked longer hours at school-related activities

  • worked at greater diversity of tasks

    • became more generalists than specialists


Findings

Findings

  • Smaller schools: fewer students per behavior (i.e., more claim on students)

  • Student Council

  • Soccer Team

  • Choir

  • Band


Smaller schools1

Smaller Schools

  • Felt less marginal to ongoing life of school

    • More a part of the school/investment in it

  • More roles of responsibility

  • Assessed value of others more in task-related than socio-emotional characteristics

  • Lower standards for admission into behavior settings


Larger schools

Larger Schools

  • Higher specialized skill development

  • More diversity of opportunities in classes & extracurricular activities

  • More ability to hide when you want to


Findings1

Findings

  • Larger schools: more students per behavior (i.e., less claim on students)

  • Student Council

  • Soccer Team

  • Choir

  • Band


3 models of ecological environment1

3 Models of Ecological Environment

(1) Behavior Setting Analysis (Roger Barker)

  • Discrete places

    (2) Ecological Metaphor (James Kelly)

  • Field Biology as Metaphor

    (3) Social Climate Perspective (Rudolph Moos)

  • Personality of the Environment


Ecological metaphor james kelly

Ecological Metaphor (James Kelly)

  • 4 principles from field biology

    • Adaptation

    • Cycling of resources

    • Interdependence

    • Succession


Ecological metaphor 1 adaptation

Ecological Metaphor: (1) Adaptation

  • Every community has both opportunities for development & demands for survival

    • Expectations / Demands

      • Formal vs. Informal

    • Opportunities

  • What are the adaptive requirements of UML as a college environment?


Adaptation coping

Adaptation & Coping

  • The Adaptation Question: “How do I have to behave to survive/thrive here?”

    • Behavior

    • Treat others

  • The Coping Question: “What skills, qualities, & coping styles does the community support & tolerate, & what does it not?”

    • Interpersonal

    • Academic


Where do these adaptive requirements occur at uml

Where do these adaptive requirements occur at UML?

  • Social Settings

    • Classrooms

    • Organizations

    • Studying Abroad

    • Athletics

  • Social Norms

    • Peers

    • Faculty

  • Policies

    • Tuition

    • Requirements


Ecological metaphor 2 cycling of resources

Ecological Metaphor: (2) Cycling of Resources

  • Focus: Search for positive aspects of community

  • How resources that nurture growth of development of community are distributed, managed, & conserved

  • Question: “What resources are available in this community for making it a better place?”

  • Think: What have been resources in your life generally? At UML?


Types of resources

Types of Resources

  • Formal: Role responsibilities

  • Informal: Non-role related qualities of people within setting, Not required

  • Manifest: On the surface, easy to recognize

  • Latent: Not expressed in the ongoing daily environment


4 main types of resources

4 Main Types of Resources

  • People

  • Settings

  • Events

  • Technology


Ecological model 3 interdependence

Ecological Model: (3) Interdependence

  • Parts of a community are related

  • Research Question: “How are people, agencies, & institutions linked to each other in the community?”

  • Setting off chains of events in individual lives

    • If only I hadn’t……

      • (you fill it in)


Ecological metaphor 4 succession

Ecological Metaphor: (4) Succession

  • Communities change over time in response to internal & external forces

  • Community Question: “How did that community come to be the way it

    currently is & what are its

    hopes for the future?”


Ecological metaphor 4 succession principle

Ecological Metaphor: (4) Succession Principle

  • Focus on

    • History

    • Hopes

    • Trajectory

  • Provides an empathy for current issues even if you hate what you see


Understanding individuals within environments

Southwick Hall

Lowell Techology Institute

1903

Coburn Hall

Lowell State College

1899


Ecological metaphor 4 succession1

Ecological Metaphor: (4) Succession

  • Goals & values of helping agent must be generally consistent with setting

  • Other goals may be pursued, but conflict should be expected.

  • Sustainability should be a goal


Ecological model summary

Ecological Model: Summary

  • Adaptation: What are the adaptive requirements?

  • Cycling of Resources: What are the available resources?

  • Interdependence: How are its different parts connected?

  • Succession: How did it come to be as it is and what are its hopes for the future?


3 models of ecological environment2

3 Models of Ecological Environment

(1) Behavior Setting Analysis (Roger Barker)

  • Discrete places

    (2) Ecological Metaphor (James Kelly)

  • Field Biology as Metaphor

    (3) Social Climate Perspective (Rudolph Moos)

  • Personality of the Environment


Model 3 social climate approach rudolph moos

Model 3: Social Climate Approach (Rudolph Moos)

  • Focus: high impact environments

  • Question: Can environment be described in terms of perceptions of people in it?

  • 3 Environmental Domains

    • Relationships

      • Quality

    • Authority Structure

      • Rules & regulations

    • Personal Development/Goal orientation

      • Reasons for being in the setting


Where does social climate come from

Where Does Social Climate Come From?

  • School & context factors

  • Physical/architectural features

  • Organizational factors

  • Teacher characteristics

  • Aggregate students characteristics


A model of determinants of classroom climate

A Model of Determinants of Classroom Climate

Organizational Factors

School and Classroom Context

Physical and Architectural Features

Aggregate Student Characteristics

Classroom Climate

Teacher Characteristics


4 ways of defining neighborhoods

4 Ways of Defining Neighborhoods

  • Site (geographical location)

    • census tracts

  • Perception

    • of neighboring practices, of crime level, of housing

  • Social network

    • interpersonal connections

  • Culture

    • historical/cultural quest


Neighborhood risk protective processes

Neighborhood Risk & Protective Processes

  • Risk processes correlated with problematic individual outcomes (personal distress/behavior problems)

    • Low income neighborhoods

    • Risky physical environments

    • Exposure to violence

  • Protective processes are strengths or resources correlated with positive outcomes (offset or buffer risk processes)

    • Sense of community among residents

    • Good school


  • What difference does the neighborhood make

    What Difference Does the Neighborhood Make?

    • Chicago neighborhoods & violent behaviors (Sampson, Raudenbush, & Earls)

      • What affected the ability of communities to prevent violence?

      • Premise – social & organizational characteristics of communities explain variation in crime rates


    Hypothesis

    Hypothesis

    • Ability of neighborhoods to maintain social control in the community related to level of violent behavior

      • Social Control

        • Ability of a group to regulate its members, to realize collective goals (group control)

      • Collective efficacy

        • Social cohesion combined with a willingness to intervene for the common good

        • Reflected in

          • Monitoring children’s play

          • Intervening to prevent street corner society

          • Confronting public nuisances


    343 chicago neighborhoods

    343 Chicago Neighborhoods

    • Over 8,000 African-American, Latino, & White people interviewed

    • 3 Types of Neighborhoods

      • “Concentrated Disadvantage”

        • below poverty line

        • on public assistance

        • female-headed families

        • unemployed

      • Immigrant concentration (Latino/foreign born)

      • Residential stability


    3 measures of violence in community

    3 Measures of Violence in Community

    • Perceived community violence

    • Personal victimization

    • Incidents of homicide


    Results

    Results

    • Collective Efficacy –

      • Positively related to residential stability

      • Negatively related to concentrated disadvantage and immigrant/foreign-born


    Results1

    Results

    • Neighborhoods high on collective efficacy

      • Less perceived violence

      • Less personal victimization

      • Fewer homicides


    Problem assessment assignment

    Problem Assessment Assignment

    • UML Resources

      • Hawk Talk (http://www.uml.edu/admissions/hawktalk/)

    • Press Releases

      • http://www.uml.edu/Media/PressReleases/default.asp

    • UML Factbook

      • http://www.uml.edu/it/ir/factbooks.html

    • US News & World Report

      • http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/best-colleges/national-universities-rankings/


  • Login