1 / 12

Thiriet , Moradi , Siddiqui, Sheppard and Creaven (2013)

Experiment into obedience. Thiriet , Moradi , Siddiqui, Sheppard and Creaven (2013). Aim. To investigate obedience towards ridiculous/bizarre direct instructions via signs. Procedure . A sign was placed on a bathroom door. Participants were observed by multiple researchers and cameras.

matt
Download Presentation

Thiriet , Moradi , Siddiqui, Sheppard and Creaven (2013)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Experiment into obedience Thiriet, Moradi, Siddiqui, Sheppard and Creaven (2013)

  2. Aim To investigate obedience towards ridiculous/bizarre direct instructions via signs.

  3. Procedure • A sign was placed on a bathroom door. • Participants were observed by multiple researchers and cameras.

  4. Footage

  5. Findings + graphs

  6. Why do we have so many year 8s? discuss sampling why we have so many year 8s? representative? uniquly obedient?

  7. Handwritten signs • Second condition to our experiment • A hand-written sign was used on the same bathroom

  8. Discussion • Difference between gender? • Difference between the official printed sign and our handwritten sign? Similar to uniform effect found in Bushman & Bickman. • What motives did our participants have? • Extraneous variables; however our design eliminates these.

  9. Methodological and Ethical issues Methodological issues: • Observer bias • Did close door influence more than sign? • Students in groups effect their actions, this could be due to conformity and not obedience. Ethical Issues: • Couldn’t gain informative consent from the participants - this would have changed their actions. • The participants may have doubted their intelligence.

  10. Any questions?

More Related