1 / 16

A theoretical reflection on the nature of psychological properties …

A theoretical reflection on the nature of psychological properties …. Dynamic view of psychological phenomena. If this is our framework, … And we wish to measure psychological variables/properties … We are confronted with a rather serious difficulty.

mari-cross
Download Presentation

A theoretical reflection on the nature of psychological properties …

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. A theoretical reflection on the nature of psychological properties … wobbles, humps and sudden jumps

  2. Dynamic view of psychological phenomena If this is our framework, … And we wish to measure psychological variables/properties … We are confronted with a rather serious difficulty... • The principal focus is on the individual person • For whom actions, thoughts, concepts, skills, … • Are the product of a real-time construction process • that requires organismic and contextual components • that emerges out of the interplay between organism and context wobbles, humps and sudden jumps - theoretical reflection

  3. Why? • Measurement = Attribution of a specific property (variable) as a definite property of a person • But, according to a dynamic/contextualist view • There are no such properties of persons • “there is no object concept in the child, it’s assembled each time the child is in a context that requires it…” • Error handling requires Conditional Independence • but • in an individual process, the next step usually depends on the preceding one: conditional dependence • The structure of variability across a group  structure of variability across an individual process (Molenaar) A dynamic, process-oriented, contextualist view requires a rethinking of psychometric axioms… What is the nature of a psychological property, how should it be measured and represented? wobbles, humps and sudden jumps - theoretical reflection

  4. The color of her socks… (1 of 2) What is the color of her socks? Yellow… The color cannot be observed directly (she won’t show you, she’s too prudish) But she will tell you the color by pointing at a spot on a color chart Both the color of the socks she wears and the color spot she points at are determinate properties… Difference between the spot and the true color = measurement error Possibility of Measurement Error!! wobbles, humps and sudden jumps - theoretical reflection

  5. The color of her socks… (2 of 2) What is the color of the socks that she will wear tomorrow? The color has not yet been determined… anything goes? No, we can provide information about tomorrow’s color By specifying constraints on the degrees of freedom • Based on the socks in her drawer, socks that are in the wash, the color she was wearing today, … The color of the socks she will be wearing tomorrow is an indeterminate property Which can be described by specifying constraints on degrees of freedom wobbles, humps and sudden jumps - theoretical reflection

  6. Back to psychological properties… (1 of 2) • The standard view • Just like the color of the socks she is wearing, but refuses to show … • Psychological properties are determinate properties (fixed or true value) • But they are covert, latent, concealed, … • And thus, must be measured indirectly, which implies measurement error (I.e variability in the measure) • Example: true score theory • Observed score = true score + error • Example: “true category” theory • Object Concept, ADHD wobbles, humps and sudden jumps - theoretica lreflection

  7. Back to psychological properties… (2 of 2) • The contextualist view • What we call psychological properties are properties that become determinate in a specific context, action, .. • They fluctuate and vary .. • However, we wish to make statements about such properties that go beyond an actual situation • In that sense, psychological properties are indeterminate properties • They are specified by describing constraints on the degrees of freedom wobbles, humps and sudden jumps - theoretical reflection

  8. The standard view (1 of 2) Measurement error We need a ruler ... We are dealing with determinate, but “hidden” properties … wobbles, humps and sudden jumps - theoretical reflection

  9. The standard view (2 of 2) 14 13 12 13 15 13 11 12 15 The true value of the variable… Is a hidden but determinate property: The average of all the values that can be sampled from a probability distribution Which implies (in principle) the possibility of • infinite sampling • independent sampling The score is based on a probability… Which can, in principle, be sampled an infinite number of times … Each sample is, in principle, independent of any other one … wobbles, humps and sudden jumps - theoretical reflection

  10. An alternative view (1 of 6) • We need a ruler to specify an indeterminate property • We learn about this property by measuring a number of determinate cases • And then use this information to specify the indeterminate property as constraints on the degrees of freedom • By specifying a characteristic range (instead of a true score) wobbles, humps and sudden jumps - theoretical reflection

  11. An alternative view (2 of 6) Range of characteristic scores characteristicness Range of uncharacteristic scores Range of uncharacteristic scores The white trapezium line specifies the characteristicness (0 to 1) of the corresponding scores. It corresponds with a standard function from Fuzzy Logic, namely the degree-of-membership function. It specifies the degree-of-membership of all possible scores, to the set of characteristic scores. The function specifies an open set of scores. The open set corresponds with the notion of an indeterminate property (properties that have yet to be determined, but are governed by constraints) The membership (or characteristicness) function • characterizes an individualperson • implies both person andcontext properties (the person’s characteristic contexts) • is not a probability function wobbles, humps and sudden jumps - theoretical reflection

  12. An alternative view (3 of 6) characteristicness The members of the open set of scores are actual scores, i.e actual measurements or observations. The open set of scores has • A characteristic number of members (measurements, observations) • Which have a characteristic temporal order (note the difference with a probability distribution) The membership (or characteristicness) function need not be unimodal, but can also be bimodal or n-modal The property of modality can be used to describe different forms of developmental transitions “Not very” characteristic score If it occurs, the context and/or the dynamic process that leads to the score are probably “not very” characteristic. Likelihood: relatively high Uncharacteristic score If it occurs, the context is prob-ably highly uncharacteristic … Or, the dynamic process that leads to the score is probably anomalous … Likelihood: very low Characteristic score If it occurs, the context and/or the dynamic process that leads to the score is probably highly characteristic. Likelihood: high wobbles, humps and sudden jumps - theoretical reflection

  13. An alternative view (4 of 6) characteristicness Ranges need not be unimodal … Multimodality: e.g. two sets of constraints and two corresponding ranges Examples Fischer: testing with and without support, optimal and functional level Goldin-Meadow and Alibali: different modes of thought under different forms of expression Van der Maas and Molenaar: simultaneous modes of conservation wobbles, humps and sudden jumps - theoretical reflection

  14. A range is not a probability infinite sampling, conditional independence The dynamics of a variable determine its sampling characteristics Characteristic sampling order Repeated measurement of ToM in normal children: learning effect and increase in score In PDD-NOS children, repeated testing causes a significant drop in the scores Dynamic testing characteristic sampling frequency Language use <> self and identity discourse An alternative view (5 of 6) wobbles, humps and sudden jumps - theoretical reflection

  15. An alternative view (6 of 6) characteristicness If you sample from a range, it will have a characteristic order and frequency Taking a test is an action … People learn from their actions (dynamic testing) wobbles, humps and sudden jumps - theoretical reflection

  16. A toolbox of rulers • The variable ruler • Specifying both determinate and indeterminate properties • e.g. a test, frequencies • The characteristicness ruler • Degree of characteristicness • Applies to properties of the person as well as the environment • The time line: short-, middle and long-term change • The degree-of-membership ruler • Diagnostic categories, linguistic categories, … wobbles, humps and sudden jumps - theoretical reflection

More Related