1 / 38

Conceptual Plans for Electricity Transmission in the West

Conceptual Plans for Electricity Transmission in the West. Agenda. Decision factors Study characteristics Study method/results Policy considerations. ?. What Factors Influence the Nature of Inter-regional Transmission Plans. Decision Factors. Load and load diversity. Winter Peak System

marcy
Download Presentation

Conceptual Plans for Electricity Transmission in the West

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Conceptual Plans for Electricity Transmission in the West

  2. Agenda • Decision factors • Study characteristics • Study method/results • Policy considerations

  3. ? What Factors Influence the Nature of Inter-regional Transmission Plans

  4. Decision Factors • Load and load diversity

  5. Winter Peak System Winter =10,000 MW Summer = 5,000 MW Installed MW = 12,000 MW Load and Load Diversity

  6. Installed Generation = 26,400 MW Summer Peak System Summer = 12,000 MW Winter = 6,000 MW Installed MW = 14,400 MW Winter Peak System Winter =10,000 MW Summer = 5,000 MW Installed MW = 12,000 MW Load and Load Diversity

  7. Installed Generation = 22,400 MW Summer Peak System Summer = 12,000 MW Winter = 6,000 MW Installed MW = 12,400 MW Winter Peak System Winter =10,000 MW Summer = 5,000 MW Installed MW = 10,000 MW Load and Load Diversity 2,000 MW

  8. Decision Factors • Load and load diversity • Reliability

  9. Installed Generation = 26,400 MW Summer Peak System Summer = 12,000 MW Winter = 6,000 MW Installed MW = 14,400 MW Winter Peak System Winter =10,000 MW Summer = 5,000 MW Installed MW = 12,000 MW Reliability 2,000 MW

  10. Installed Generation = 22,400 MW Summer Peak System Summer = 12,000 MW Winter = 6,000 MW Installed MW = 12,400 MW Winter Peak System Winter =10,000 MW Summer = 5,000 MW Installed MW = 10,000 MW Reliability 1,000 MW 1,000 MW

  11. Installed Generation = 24,400 MW Summer Peak System Summer = 12,000 MW Winter = 6,000 MW Installed MW = 13,400 MW Winter Peak System Winter =10,000 MW Summer = 5,000 MW Installed MW = 11,000 MW Reliability 1,000 MW 1,000 MW

  12. Decision Factors • Load and load diversity • Reliability • Fuel source location

  13. Summer Peak System Summer = 12,000 MW 2,000 MW 10,000 MW Fuel Source Location 2,000 MW

  14. Decision Factors • Load and load diversity • Reliability • Fuel source location • Economics

  15. Generation Displacement $100M/year Annual Cost 100% % Usage 0% Unit Cost Lower Higher Economics Usage Factor

  16. Study Characteristics What study does • Provides broad base conceptual plans • Provides insight into issue “trade-offs” • Suggests principles for expansion guidance • Suggests financing mechanisms • Identifies alternatives to conventional transmission expansion

  17. Study Characteristics What study does not do • Evaluate plans through 2004 • Study expansion of natural gas pipeline system • Consider generation capital costs – least cost plan • Provide definitive actionable construction plan

  18. Method of Study & Results

  19. Base Study Characteristics • Two generation expansion scenario’s • “Gas scenario” • “Other than gas scenario” – OTG Base Year = 2004

  20. Base Study Characteristics • Simulated 2010 • 2% per year load growth • 25% generation reserve margins • Performance analysis • Production cost model • Spreadsheet • Gas price variance • Hydro availability Base Year = 2004

  21. Fig 14A - Estimated Cost = $2.1B Gas Scenario – New Lines

  22. Gas Scenario – New Capacity Fig 14B

  23. Other Than Gas – New Lines Fig 15B - Estimated Cost = $8B - $12B

  24. Other Than Gas – New Capacity Fig 15C

  25. Next Technical Steps • Evaluate alternate load growth scenarios and natural gas pricing • Incremental transmission analysis including DC options • Evaluate market power issues • Include emerging technology-based transmission applications

  26. Five Recommended Principles Principle 1 Any expansion of the transmission system must maintain reliability, support both load and resource diversity in the Western Interconnection, and enable an efficient wholesale electric market.

  27. Key policy issues • 1. What is the value of increasing diversity in the fuels used to generate electricity? • 2. What is the value of transmission to mitigate generation market power?

  28. Principle 2 • Transmission pricing and cost recovery should provide incentives for regionally beneficial expansion and system improvement.

  29. Transmission financing alternatives • Spread the costs of new transmission across all users of the transmission system. • Provide that a portion of the difference in electricity prices between two delivery points (congestion costs) is used to pay for new transmission to mitigate congestion. • Implement an “open season” model like that used for natural gas pipeline expansion.

  30. Principle 3 • A forward-looking Western interconnection-wide transmission planning process should be established.

  31. Key policy issues • How can a proactive transmission planning process be instituted in the Western Interconnection? • How will new transmission technologies and non-transmission alternatives (load-based generation, energy efficiency and demand reduction) alternatives be considered?

  32. Principle 4 • Transmission should enable access to more economical and less-polluting resources, thereby minimizing environmental impacts on both a local and regional basis.

  33. Principle 5 • All siting review processes must be streamlined and coordinated. State review processes should address both local and interconnection-wide needs, and federal agency review processes must be coordinated internally as well as with state, tribal and local authorities.

  34. ? Questions

More Related