Community rehabilitation program crp quality scorecard
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 23

Community Rehabilitation Program(CRP) Quality Scorecard PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 86 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Community Rehabilitation Program(CRP) Quality Scorecard. CRP QUALITY DELIVERABLES. Provider Fact Sheet (4/1/14) (methods for consumers to consider for informed choice selection of provider) Web-based Provider System (7/31/14) (used by consumers, providers, staff)

Download Presentation

Community Rehabilitation Program(CRP) Quality Scorecard

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Community rehabilitation program crp quality scorecard

Community Rehabilitation Program(CRP)

Quality Scorecard


Crp quality deliverables

CRP Quality Scorecard

CRP QUALITY DELIVERABLES

  • Provider Fact Sheet (4/1/14)

    • (methods for consumers to consider for informed choice selection of provider)

  • Web-based Provider System (7/31/14)

    • (used by consumers, providers, staff)

  • Satisfaction Surveys (4/1/14)

    • (consumers & counselors)


Crp quality deliverables continued

CRP Quality Scorecard

CRP QUALITY DELIVERABLES (continued)

  • CRP Scorecard and Reports (6/30/14)

  • Provider manual chapter on CRP Quality System and use (8/30/14)

  • CRP monitoring policy/procedure (8/1/14)

  • CRP training (9/30/14)

  • Staff training (9/30/14)


Crp quality

CRP Quality Scorecard

CRP QUALITY

FACTS:

  • Ohio has a significant # of individuals waiting for VR services. (1,290 as of 3/14/14)

  • The VR budget is expected to remain relatively stable.

  • Ohio’s rehab rate is well below RSA federal standards.


Crp quality continued

CRP Quality Scorecard

CRP QUALITY (continued)

FACTS:

  • Ohio’s cost per outcome is one of the highest in the nation.

    Therefore…

  • OOD must develop a method to evaluate vendor services.


Assumptions

CRP Quality Scorecard

ASSUMPTIONS

  • A scorecard will assist in enhancing consumer’s informed choice.

  • Cost per outcome must .

  • Services (as is) do not result in a sufficient proportion of successful outcomes.

  • Individuals with MSD may require a different approach.


Assumptions continued

CRP Quality Scorecard

ASSUMPTIONS (continued)

  • OOD must have more outcomes with similar $$$.

  • Effective service delivery should result in reduction of the waiting list.

  • Consideration must be given to how other states evaluate their vendors.


Standards

CRP Quality Scorecard

STANDARDS

  • Workgroup meeting choices:

    • Face-to-face

    • Go To Meeting (online)

    • Video Conference

    • Teleconference

  • Timeline: Recommendations completed by June 30, 2014


Standards continued

CRP Quality Scorecard

STANDARDS (continued)

  • Scorecard input:

    • Must be based on currently available data

    • Measures must be able to be applied universally to all CRPs

    • Roll-out-ready by October 1, 2014

  • Time Commitments

    • Frequency

    • Location

    • Subgroups


Neutrality

CRP Quality Scorecard

NEUTRALITY

  • Workgroup must represent the Ohio provider community, in general.

  • Scorecard items must represent unbiased elements (not tailored to large/small/urban/rural).

  • Must respect complexities of ALL disability types.


Transparency

CRP Quality Scorecard

TRANSPARENCY

  • OOD is interested in a cooperative effort to develop the scorecard.

  • We anticipate there may be very different opinions, and consensus may not always be possible

  • We will strive to consider ALL options before making final recommendations.


Transparency continued

CRP Quality Scorecard

TRANSPARENCY (continued)

  • This process is intended to create a structure by which OOD and consumers can evaluate vendors, and for vendors to evaluate themselves objectively.


Scorecard items use in this context

CRP Quality Scorecard

SCORECARD ITEMS(? use in this context ?)

  • RSA Standards & Indicators

    1.1-closed cases w/an employment outcome (> +1 from previous yr.)1.2 -of closed cases that received service, the % w/an employment outcome (RSA 55.80%)

    1.3 -of closed cases w/an emp. Outcome, the % w/wages > minimum wage (72.60%)

    1.4 -of closed cases w/an emp. Outcome, the % w/wages > minimum wage + SD (62.40%)


Scorecard items use in this context1

CRP Quality Scorecard

SCORECARD ITEMS(? use in this context ?)

  • RSA Standards & Indicators

    1.5-ratio of average state wage to the average wage of closed cases w/employment outcome w/wages > minimum wage (0.52)1.6 –difference between % of closed cases w/employment outcome w/wage > minimum wage that are self support at application + % of closed w/emp. outcome w/wage > minimum wage that are self support at closure. (53.00)

    2.1 –ratio of minority service rate to non-minority service rate (0.800)

    A potential concept: Tying rehab. rate to vendors providing services after IPE development (i.e. “PlacementRate”)


Additional scorecard items

CRP Quality Scorecard

ADDITIONAL SCORECARD ITEMS

Fiscal

  • Time from service completed to date billing submitted.

  • Frequency of charges for non-billable items.

  • # of rejected bills.

  • Response time on rejected payments.

    (significance of N/A rating)

  • Cost per case


Satisfaction survey results

CRP Quality Scorecard

SATISFACTION SURVEY RESULTS

  • Consumer

  • Counselor

    The surveys are in development with deadlines of 4/1 and 6/30 respectively.

    Greg Dormer and Jim Gears are point for the surveys.


Ideas from other states

CRP Quality Scorecard

IDEAS FROM OTHER STATES

Demographics

  • Population(s) served – gender, age….

  • Disability type(s) – (primary)

  • Job type (occupational codes)


Ideas from other states continued

CRP Quality Scorecard

IDEAS FROM OTHER STATES (continued)

Timeliness

  • Auth. Date  Service date

  • Services provided within parameter of standardized fee schedule definitions.

    Placement Rate:

  • # of successful outcomes per auth. for placement


Quality measures

CRP Quality Scorecard

QUALITY MEASURES

  • Wages per hour

  • Hours per week

  • Benefits


Workgroup sub committees

CRP Quality Scorecard

WORKGROUP SUB-COMMITTEES

  • Scorecard items

  • Visual/graphics and definitions

  • System User Acceptance Testing

  • Training/roll out

    - 4/16 CRP Director’s Mtg.

    - August/Sept.

    - Oct. follow up


Parking lot items for future discussion

CRP Quality Scorecard

PARKING LOT ITEMS(for future discussion)

  • Timeliness between auth/referral/service start and service completed

  • Definitions for each of the selected scorecard measures

  • Quality measure – Benefits  What if consumer declines available benefits?

  • Value of demographic data

  • Must tie service to survey to reflect which vendor provided service


Parking lot items for future discussion1

CRP Quality Scorecard

PARKING LOT ITEMS(for future discussion)

  • Clearly distinguishing WHO is being evaluated

  • Survey response rates

  • Emailing surveys - consumer support advocates (CSAs)?

  • New vendors (w/no data for scorecard)

  • Fee schedule for specialized programs


Meetings

CRP Quality Scorecard

MEETINGS

  • Face-to-face from 9:30am – 1pm @ OOD (w/call-in option)

  • Avoid 1st week of the month

    • Monday, April 7th

    • Monday, April 28th

    • Monday, May 12th

    • Tuesday, May 20th

    • Monday, June 16th

    • Wednesday, June 25th (if needed)


  • Login