Computed Radiography (CR),
Download
1 / 65

Computed Radiography CR - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 2217 Views
  • Updated On :

Computed Radiography (CR), Digital Radiography (DR), & Digital Spots George David Associate Professor of Radiology Medical College of Georgia Computed Radiography (CR) Re-usable metal imaging plates replace film & cassette Uses conventional bucky & x-ray equipment CR Exposure & Readout

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Computed Radiography CR' - lotus


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Slide1 l.jpg

Computed Radiography (CR),

Digital Radiography (DR),

& Digital Spots

George DavidAssociate Professor of Radiology

Medical College of Georgia


Computed radiography cr l.jpg
Computed Radiography (CR)

  • Re-usable metal imaging plates replace film & cassette

  • Uses conventional bucky & x-ray equipment





Computer radiography cr l.jpg

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Computer Radiography (CR)

  • plate is photostimulable phosphor

  • radiation traps electrons in high energy states

  • higher statesform latent image

H

i

g

h

e

r

E

n

e

r

g

y

E

l

e

c

t

r

o

n

S

t

a

t

e

P

h

o

t

o

n

p

u

m

p

s

e

l

e

c

t

r

o

n

t

o

h

i

g

h

e

r

e

n

e

r

g

y

s

t

a

t

e

X

-

R

a

y

P

h

o

t

o

n

L

o

w

e

r

E

n

e

r

g

y

E

l

e

c

t

r

o

n

S

t

a

t

e


Reading imaging plate l.jpg
Reading Imaging Plate

  • reader scans plate with laser

  • laser releaseselectrons trapped inhigh energystates

  • electrons fall to lowenergy states

  • electrons give upenergy as visible light

  • light intensity ismeasure of incident radiation

Lower Energy Electron State


Reading imaging plate8 l.jpg
Reading Imaging Plate

  • Reader scans plate with laser light using rotating mirror

  • Film pulled through scanner by rollers

  • Light given off by plate measured byPM tube &recorded by computer


Laser emitted light are different colors l.jpg
Laser & Emitted Light are Different Colors

  • Phosphor stimulated by laser light

  • Intensity of emitted light indicates amount of radiation incident on phosphor at each location

  • Only color of light emitted by phosphor measured by PMT


Cr operation l.jpg
CR Operation

  • after read-out, plate erased using a bright light

  • plate can be erased virtually without limit

  • Plate life defined not by erasure cycles but by physical wear


Cr phosphor layer l.jpg
CR Phosphor Layer

  • Phosphor balanced for

    • x-ray absorption characteristics

    • light output

    • laser light scatter

    • screen thickness

  • Above variables affect

    • electronic noise

    • image resolution properties

    • speed of imaging system

  • Overcoat protects plate from physical damage


Cr resolution l.jpg
CR Resolution

  • Small cassettes have better spatial resolution

    • Smaller pixels

    • More pixels / mm


Cr throughput l.jpg
CR Throughput

  • Generally slower than film processing

  • CR reader must finish reading one plate before starting to read the next

  • Film processors can run films back to back


Cr latitude l.jpg
CR Latitude

  • Much greater latitude than screen/film

  • Plate responds to many decades of input exposure

    • under / overexposures unlikely

  • Computer scale inputs exposure to viewable densities

    • Unlike film, receptor separate from viewer


Film screen vs cr latitude l.jpg
Film Screen vs. CR Latitude

CR Latitude: .01 – 100 mR

100



Digital radiography dr l.jpg
Digital Radiography (DR)

  • Digital bucky

  • Incorporated into x-ray equipment


Digital radiography dr18 l.jpg
Digital Radiography (DR)

  • Receptor provides direct digital output

  • No processor / reader required

    • Images available in < 15 seconds

    • Much less work for technologist


Direct vs indirect l.jpg
Direct vs. Indirect

TFT = THIN-FILM TRANSISTOR ARRAY


Direct dr l.jpg
“Direct” DR

  • X-ray energy converted directly to electrical signal

  • X-rays interact with semiconductor material

    • Amorphous selenium

  • X-rays converted directly into electrical charge

    • No intermediate steps


Indirect dr l.jpg

Light

“Indirect” DR

  • X-ray strike scintillator producing light

  • Photodiode array converts light to electrons


Indirect dr22 l.jpg
Indirect DR

  • Light spreads can limit spatial resolution

  • Can be controlled by “channeling”

  • Winning in the marketplace


Digital radiography dr23 l.jpg
Digital Radiography (DR)

  • Potentially lower patient dose than CR

  • High latitude as for CR

  • Digital bucky fragile

    • First DR portables comingto market


Summary l.jpg
Summary

  • DR becoming industry leader in radiographic imaging

  • DR images displayed & stored in about 8 seconds

  • DR has faster throughput

    • Up to 2-4 times faster than traditional screen-film-darkroom technology


Raw data image l.jpg
Raw Data Image

  • Unprocessed image as read from receptor

    • CR

      • Intensity data from PMT’s as a result of scanning plate with laser

    • DR

      • Raw Data read directly from TFT array

  • Not a readable diagnostic image

  • Requires computer post-processing

    • Specific software algorithms must be applied to image prior to presenting it as finished radiograph


Enhancing raw image image segmentation l.jpg
Enhancing Raw Image (Image Segmentation)

*

  • Identify collimated image border

  • Separate raw radiation from anatomy

  • Apply appropriate tone-scale to image

    • Done with look-up table (LUT)

This process is specific to a particular body part and projection


Look up table lut l.jpg
Look Up Table (LUT)

  • Converts a raw data pixel value to a processed pixel value

  • “Original” raw data pixel value indicates amount of radiation falling on pixel


Image segmentation l.jpg
Image Segmentation

  • Computer must establish location of collimated border of image

  • Computer then defines anatomic region

  • Finished image produced by tone scaling

    • Requires histogram analysis of anatomic region


Histogram l.jpg
Histogram

  • Graph showing how much of image is exposed at various levels


Tone scaling post processing l.jpg
Tone ScalingPost-Processing

  • Body part & projection-specific algorithms determine average exposure

    • Must correctly identify anatomical region

  • LUT computed to display image with proper

    • Density

    • Contrast



Lut selection l.jpg
LUT Selection

  • LUT calculated by algorithm depends on

    • Body part

    • projection

  • User can also alter LUT manually


Lut selection33 l.jpg
LUT Selection

  • Monitors on CR reader or DR console compared to reading workstations have

    • lower resolution

    • poorer quality

    • Recommended that LUT not be manually modified


Film screen limited latitude l.jpg
Film/Screen Limited Latitude

  • Film use has little ambiguity about proper radiation exposure


Should i worry l.jpg
Should I Worry?

  • In CR & DR, image density is no longer a reliable indicator of exposure factor control.


Cr dr latitude l.jpg
CR / DR Latitude

DANGER Will Robinson!!!

  • Almost impossible to under or overexpose CR / DR

  • Underexposures look noisy

  • Overexposures look GOOD!!!


Exposure creep tendency of radiographs toward higher then necessary exposures l.jpg
Exposure Creep:Tendency of radiographs toward higher-then-necessary exposures

  • No detrimental effect on image quality

  • Desire to see less noise on radiographs

  • Increased exposure latitude

  • No one complains




Exposure index l.jpg
Exposure Index image?

  • Each manufacturer provides feedback to technologist on exposure to digital receptor

  • Displayed on CR reader monitor

  • Displayed on workstations


Exposure index42 l.jpg
Exposure Index image?

  • Measure of radiation received by receptor below anatomy

  • Not a direct measure of patient exposure

  • If exposure index higher than recommended range, patient overexposed


Exposure indication varies between manufacturers l.jpg
Exposure Indication Varies between Manufacturers image?

Fuji

  • “S” number goes down as exposure goes up!

  • S is half when exposure doubled

  • Kodak

    • Logarithmic scale

    • EI goes up 300 when exposure doubled


Exposure index44 l.jpg
Exposure Index image?

  • Technologist should strive to keep exposure index consistent

  • Kodak recommendation for exposure index

    • 1800 – 2200

  • George’s recommendation

    • “Maximum tolerable noise”

    • As low as possible while providingtolerable noise

    • This is not a beauty contest!


Calculated exposure index affected by l.jpg
Calculated Exposure Index Affected by image?

  • X-Ray technique selection

  • Improper centering of image on cassette

  • Improper selection of study or projection

  • Placing two or more views on same cassette

    • Can cause image to appear dark


Phototimed phantom image l.jpg
Phototimed Phantom Image image?

  • 75 kVp

  • 88 mAs

  • 2460 EI


Let s approximately double mas l.jpg
Let’s Approximately Double mAs image?

  • 75 kVp

  • 88 mAs

  • 2460 EI

  • 75 kVp

  • 160 mAs

  • 2680 EI


Let s go crazy l.jpg
Let’s Go Crazy image?

  • 75 kVp

  • 88 mAs

  • 2460 EI

  • 75 kVp

  • 640 mAs

  • 3300 EI


How low can you go cut mas in half l.jpg
How Low Can You Go? Cut mAs in Half! image?

  • 75 kVp

  • 88 mAs

  • 2460 EI

  • 75 kVp

  • 40 mAs

  • 2060 EI


Let s go crazy low l.jpg
Let’s Go Crazy Low image?

  • 75 kVp

  • 8 mAs

  • 1380 EI

  • 75 kVp

  • 1 mAs

  • 550 EI


Cr artifacts l.jpg
CR Artifacts image?

  • Physical damage to imaging plates

    • Cracks, scuffs, scratches

    • Contamination

    • Dust / dirt

  • Dirt in reader

  • Highly sensitive to scatter radiation


Cr grid interference l.jpg
CR Grid Interference image?

  • 103 lines / inch grids have same frequency as CR laser scanner. This can cause “Moire” pattern artifact

  • Align grid lines perpendicular to scan orientation whenever possible

    • Reduces chances of artifacts caused by laser scanner.


Dr artifacts l.jpg
DR Artifacts image?

  • Dead detector elements

  • Spatial variations in background signal & gain

  • Grid interference

  • Software can help correct for above


Shifting gears fluoroscopy issues l.jpg
Shifting Gears: image?Fluoroscopy Issues


Digital video sources l.jpg

I image?

T

m

u

a

b

g

e

e

Image

Tube

TV

Lens System

X-Ray

Input

Amplfier

Analog

to

Digital

Converter

Digital

Memory

(Computer)

Digital Video Sources

  • DR type image receptor

  • Conventional Image Intensifier with Video Signal Digitized (“Frame Grabber”)


Digital spot film l.jpg
Digital Spot Film image?

  • Frame grabber digitizes image

  • Digital image saved by computer

  • Radiographic Technique used

    • required to control quantum noise


Last image hold l.jpg
Last Image Hold image?

  • Computer displays last fluoro image before radiation shut off.

  • Image noisier than for digital spot

    • Image made at fluoroscopic technique / intensity

  • Allows operator to review static processes without keeping beam on

    • ideal for teaching environments

    • ideal for orthopedic applications such as hip pinning

  • Less radiation than digital spot


Fluoro frame averaging l.jpg
Fluoro Frame Averaging image?

  • Conventional fluoro only displays current frame

  • Frame averaging allows computer to average current with user-selectable number of previous frames

    • Averages current frame & history


Fluoro frame averaging tradeoff l.jpg
Fluoro Frame Averaging Tradeoff image?

  • Advantage:

    • Reduces quantum noise

  • Disadvantage

    • Because history frames are averaged with current frame, any motion can result in lag


Other fluoro features l.jpg
Other Fluoro Features image?

  • Real-time Edge Enhancement / Image Filtering

  • Option of using lower frame rates (15, 7.5, 3.75 fps rather than 30)

    • computer displays last frame until next one

      • reduces flicker

    • Lowers patient and scatter exposure

      • Exposure proportional to frame rate

    • dynamic studies may be jumpy



Dr mobile units l.jpg
DR Mobile Units image?

  • See image immediately

  • Wireless transmission of images

GE Definium AMX 700


Other possibilities l.jpg
Other Possibilities image?

  • Tomosynthesis

    • Multi-slice linear tomography from one exposure series

  • Histogram Equalization

    • Use computer to provide approximately equal density to various areas of image.


Dr energy subtraction l.jpg
DR & Energy Subtraction image?

  • 2 images taken milliseconds apart at 2 different kVp’s

  • Combine / subtract images

Soft Tissue Image

Bone Image


The end l.jpg
The End image?

?


ad