1 / 20

Evaluating the Effects of Transit Crowding - Transbay Ridership Forecasting Model

Evaluating the Effects of Transit Crowding - Transbay Ridership Forecasting Model. Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB Planning Applications Conference presented by Vamsee Modugula Cambridge Systematics, Inc. May 9, 2007. Why Model Transit Crowding?.

Download Presentation

Evaluating the Effects of Transit Crowding - Transbay Ridership Forecasting Model

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Evaluating the Effects of Transit Crowding - Transbay Ridership Forecasting Model Transportation leadership you can trust. presented toTRB Planning Applications Conference presented byVamsee ModugulaCambridge Systematics, Inc. May 9, 2007

  2. Why Model Transit Crowding? • Models forecast travel demand (irrespective of capacity?) • Highway models account for congestion by increasing travel time • Transit models account for parking capacity by increasing drive time to station • No direct modeling of increased wait time due to crowding • Crowding affects ridership on competing transit modes

  3. Transbay Ridership Study - Overview • Determine future transit ridership at Transbay Terminal • AC Transit (Bus bay requirements) • Analyze the impact of capacity constraints on Transit • More accurate ridership estimates with improved travel forecasting tools • Provide analysis needed for the TIFIA loan application • Project study team included TJPA, AC Transit, BART, MTC and WTA

  4. Innovative Features of This Project • New Mode choice model with detailed transit modes • New capability to model Transit crowding • Model passenger perception that travel time is more onerous when they have to stand or when the vehicle is crowded • Increased wait times when passengers are unable to board a crowded vehicle • Apply a range of capacity assumptions for BART • Analyse ridership and traffic volumes for Peak Hours

  5. Better analysis of competing transit modes Traditional Method: “best path” between home neighborhood & work New Method: multiple paths” + detailed treatment of each transit option in mode choice models Full treatment of access/egress & transfers

  6. Mode Choice Structure for the Trans Bay Ridership Model Mode Choice Motorized Bicycle Walk Drive Alone Shared Ride 2 Shared Ride 3+ Transit Walk-Access Drive-Access Local Bus ExpressBus LRT Commuter Rail BART Ferry Local Bus ExpressBus LRT Commuter Rail BART Ferry

  7. Base year model validation - Daily Validation for the Bay Bridge

  8. Base year model validation – Freeway Volumes

  9. Base year model validation – Peak Hour BART

  10. Transit crowding model • When trains are too crowded, riders can: • Wait for next train • Switch to bus or ferry • Switch to auto • Includes feedback to mode choice models • Longer travel times for riders who would experience over-crowding

  11. Transit Crowd Modeling • Balance transit demand against capacity by applying: • In-vehicle Travel Time Adjutment

  12. Transit Crowd Modeling • Wait Time Adjustment • Based on probability to board a transit line • Stochastic Assignment to reallocate ridership based on capacity • Trip Tables with excess demand • Trip tables with perceived travel times and actual wait times

  13. Projected Growth in Travel in the Corridor • Growth in jobs faster than population in San Francisco County • Huge increases in commuter and total trips in the corridor • Increased Transbay Travel demand – Can BART meet demand for service

  14. 2030 MODEL – CAPACITY ASSUMPTIONS (Peak Hour Peak Direction)

  15. 2030 MODEL –CAPACITY ASSUMPTIONS (Peak Hour Peak Direction)

  16. Year 2030 Transit Ridership – PM Peak Hour(Low Bart Capacity Alternative)

  17. Year 2030 Transit Ridership – PM Peak Hour(High Bart Capacity Alternative)

  18. Year 2015 Transit Ridership – PM Peak Hour(Low Bart Capacity Alternative)

  19. Year 2015 Transit Ridership – PM Peak Hour(High Bart Capacity Alternative)

  20. Conclusions • This analysis did not include contraints on station platform capacity • Transit Crowd Modeling is a good way of forecasting realistic transit ridership • Assists transit operators in preparing service plans for future years.

More Related