1 / 25

Who are we reaching ? Social demographics, health and social risk, services What are motivations and barriers related

What did the Evaluation Measure?. Who are we reaching ? Social demographics, health and social risk, services What are motivations and barriers related to call / screening? Reason for call, concerns about child, previous consultations What are the findings from screenings?

lorant
Download Presentation

Who are we reaching ? Social demographics, health and social risk, services What are motivations and barriers related

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. What did the Evaluation Measure? • Who are we reaching? Social demographics, health and social risk, services • What are motivations and barriers related to call / screening? Reason for call, concerns about child, previous consultations • What are the findings from screenings? PEDS and MCHAT results (What does this stand for) • What are the services provided to low and high-risk children and families? Referrals, parent guidance, annual (re)screenings, care coordination, follow up, intensity of service) • What is the impact? Screening outcomes – PEDS/MCHAT confirmed, diagnoses, Connections to programs and services

  2. What are the Key Findings? • Identifying children at high risk (higher than national average). • Most callers with young children do not have developmental concerns. • Care Coordination successfully connects children at high and moderate risk to assessment and developmental services. • Children at low risk are receiving referrals to early childhood support services.

  3. What are the Key Components? • Identification and Screening • Intervention • Guidance • Referrals to programs and services • Care coordination • Follow up • Connection to services • Outcomes for children with positive screens • System Improvement/Transition to sustainability • Partnership development • Dissemination • Data Support • Measures and data collection • Systems • Analysis

  4. Data and System Evolution

  5. Who are we Reaching? • “In-reach” targets children 0-5 among larger pool of 500,000 callers annually. • 28% have children 0-5 years at home. • 91% female • 37% with only a high school education or less • 65% Hispanic; 2 in 5 Spanish as primary language • 25% African-American • 20% uninsured (80% qualify for Medi-Cal) • Half have low incomes (<1,000 /mo.) and half are unemployed • Many utilizing public resources

  6. Who is getting screened? 15.4% 5% 74% White Hispanic Black

  7. Who is getting screened? *Reasons are among all callers referred for developmental screening Children and families screened: Calling for assistance with basic needs 37% Female 95% Single-parents 50%. Children with health insurance 90.5% Children with Medi-Cal coverage 82% Children uninsured 7.4% One or two children 5 or younger 84%

  8. Reasons for Calling *Reasons are among all callers referred for developmental screening • Child development concerns 11.8% • Early childhood education 11.3% • Child care 8.1% • Prior child development concern28% • Sought previous help 17% • Sought help from a medical provider 15% • Expressed concern more likely to screen at highest risk (Path A=37% and failed M-CHAT 38%).

  9. Who are we Reaching? Callers with children 0-5 Offered Screening 10.9% 84,0001 Interested 70% accept offer 4,1372 2,896 1 211 LA annually 2 based on 10 month record review

  10. Screening Capacity in 2011

  11. PEDS Screening Results Two and one-half times the National Average

  12. Autism (M-CHAT) Screening For Children 16 to 48 months Two Times National Average Data from September 2009 through March 26, 2012

  13. Families who Consulted Medical Provider * Data from September 2009 through March 26, 2012

  14. What Services are Provided to Families? Referrals and Care Coordination • 4,606 referrals to different intervention programs • 90.3% of children received a referral in one category • 30.6% had referral in two categories. • 25% of children were enrolled into one or more intervention services • 30.6% were connected to referrals or had applications pending • 38.6 % children low risk scheduled for annual re-screening

  15. Program and Service Referrals

  16. Program and Service Referrals for Children with a Positive Autism Screening

  17. Program and Service Referrals for Children with a Positive Autism Screening

  18. Impact of Care Coordination

  19. Effectiveness of Care Coordination

  20. 211 LA Developmental Screening Partner Network • Signed MOUs • LA County Office of Education- Special Education Division • LA County Office of Education- Head Start State Preschool • Child Development Institute • Comprehensive Autism Related Education, Inc. (CARE) • El Nido Family Services -Early Head Start Program • South Central Los Angeles Regional Center • Children’s Institute, Inc. - Early Head Start and Head Start Program • The Alliance for Children’s Rights-Early Steps Initiative • Kedren Community Health Center - Early Head Start/Head Start and State Preschool • Human Services Association –Early Head Start Program • Montebello Unified School District – Head Start Program • Eisner Pediatric & Family Medical Center • MOUs in Progress • Los Angeles County - Perinatal Mental Health Task Force • USC –School of Early Childhood Education –Early Head Start and Head Start Program • Training and Research Foundation Head Start Program • Los Angeles County Public Health –Child Health and Disability Prevention Program (CHDP) • Los Angeles County Public Health –Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health Programs • Los Angeles County Office of Child Care- STEP for Excellence Program • Magnolia Community Initiative

  21. Collaborators • Health Communication Research Laboratory, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis Missouri –research collaboration with 2-1-1s across the USA to eliminate health disparities • ZERO TO THREE - Policy Partner • Help Me Grow – 211 LA is a member of the HMG California Learning Consortium • Magnolia Place Community Initiative- Strengthening Families through the promotion of protective factors. 211 LA is a member of the Magnolia multi-system network and connects children that are screened and their parent/caregivers to the local initiative • Los Angeles County Perinatal Mental Health Task Force - working on grant with 211 LA to conduct maternal depression screening • Lucile Packard Foundation – 211 LA is a member of the California Collaborative for Children with Special Health Care Needs

  22. Questions Going Forward? • What proportion of callers with stated concerns vs. none accept screening offer and are screened? • Currently a small proportion of parents have stated (or previous) concerns; is that changing over time? • Opportunities to reduce missed opportunities among clients with stated concerns, e.g., increased warm transfers? • How is the intensity of service changing over time as measured by the number of transactions required to connect families to services? • What children and families require more assistance; how can in-reach be used to increase chances of finding them?

  23. Questions Going Forward? • What factors are related to outcomes; differences between risk factors or groups? • What is best way to measure connections for low risk children? • System and program improvements resulting from collaboration with 211 Developmental Screening Project? • Opportunities for using technology and agreements to improve the exchange of outcome information and consent, e.g., telephonic signature, portals? • Additional opportunities to link DSP with related efforts (national and local), e.g., research re: the value of screening, theory and practice re: family strengthening and protective factors, and expanded screening?

  24. Developmental Screening Call Mapping

  25. Warm Transfer with Stated Concern

More Related