1 / 14

Midterm review of the use of structural funds for energy efficiency in existing housing in France

Midterm review of the use of structural funds for energy efficiency in existing housing in France. Carine Puyol March-23, 2011. L’Union Sociale pour l’habitat. 4.2 millions of social housing dwellings in France 10 millions of inhabitants housed Our commitment:

lilesd
Download Presentation

Midterm review of the use of structural funds for energy efficiency in existing housing in France

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Midterm review of the use ofstructural funds for energyefficiency in existing housing in France Carine Puyol March-23, 2011

  2. L’Union Sociale pour l’habitat • 4.2 millions of social housing dwellings in France • 10 millions of inhabitants housed Our commitment: • 800 000 households will benefit from energy retrofit for their home by 2020

  3. ERDF allocation in French regions (without DOM)

  4. March 2011: 82.5% of ERDF funds allocated in 22 months • 9 regions have spent all ERDF to Energy efficiency to housing • 4 have decided to increase ERDF amount to energy efficiency for housing in 4% limitation • 2 have have asked to increase ERDF for EE amount beyond the 4% limitation at regional level

  5. How many Households? March 2011: 44,569 dwellings for low-income households retrofited with the contribution of ERDF (accepted or under approval process) July 2011: 63,000 dwellings will be supported by ERDF Average ERDF support: 3452euros per dwelling

  6. Leverage effect of ERDF FEDER Eco-loan National subsidies local subsidies

  7. Leverage effect of ERDF • Criteria of performance: the better the energy performance improvement is, the higher the ERDF co-financing rate is 

  8. ERDF impact

  9. Step change in energy performance

  10. Significant savings per Households • Energy savings per year per households(*): • 1170 euros per year or 98 euros per month • Based on local experience: energy retrofiting means 40% of energy saving (*) Theoretical savings based on an estimated energy cost of 7,24 euros/kwh

  11. Potentialof 15,000 jobs Total investments generated with ERDF support in 15 regions (out of 22) = 570 millions d’euros =10 317 jobs created or maintained = 687 jobs per regions i.e., a potential of 15 000 jobs for the 22 regions (excl. DOM) • Local jobs: mainly SMEs, jobs that can’t be delocalized • 1MM d’euros investi dans la rénovation de logement= 18.2 emploi (source: FFB)

  12. Success Model: partnership - Vertical Partnership: From European institutions down to local organisations. • Partnership at european, national and local level. • Continuous flow of information/feedback/success stories • Integration into national and regional environmental strategies

  13. Success Model: partnership - Horizontal Partnership National level: work with the French Administration on the conditions of implementation of the ERDF measure in regions. At the local level: Regional Associations Hlm with their partners work on • Diagnosis and evaluation of needs at regional level • the definition of ERDF eligibility criterion, • Flexibility in the type of ERDF forms of interventions (allocation/ financial tool) • Accompanying measures: support to social housing organization • Capitalisation and monitoring

  14. Recommandations • Idenfication of the needs to build energy strategy at regional level: end of 4% limitation • Mobilization of all partners (Institutional, professional and financial): EC and members state should encourage implementation of partnership • Flexibility in the type of ERDF forms of interventions (allocation/ financial tool) • Administrative simplification

More Related