1 / 18

Final Results of Drift Cell Simulation and Parametrization

1. Final Results of Drift Cell Simulation and Parametrization. A. Gresele and T. Rovelli Bologna University & INFN Cell Simulation Procedure Method Used to Parametrize Final Results Conclusions. 2. Simulated Tracks Granularity. 1 mm between x = 0 cm and 2 cm;

Download Presentation

Final Results of Drift Cell Simulation and Parametrization

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 1 Final Results of Drift CellSimulation and Parametrization • A. Gresele and T. Rovelli • Bologna University & INFN • Cell Simulation Procedure • Method Used to Parametrize • Final Results • Conclusions A. Gresele - CMS week

  2. 2 Simulated Tracks Granularity • 1 mm between x = 0 cm and 2 cm; • 5 degree between d = 0o and 45o (between d = -45o and 45o when Bw not 0) • 0.03 T between Bd = 0 and 0.3 T • 0.1 T between Bn = 0 and 1 T • 0.03 T between Bw = 0 • and 0.3 T Bn Bw  Bd Only BnBw and BnBd pairs to reduce the num- ber of simulated tracks. x sense wire cathode track A. Gresele - CMS week

  3. 3 Method Used to Producethe Drift Times • Full simulation on ALPHA machines ; • Bologna Condor facility used ; • Four tracks for each x, , B considered . •  • For each track we assumed the drift time is given by : • 50% one electron • 40% two electrons • 10% three electrons A. Gresele - CMS week

  4. 4 Method Used to Parametrizethe Drift Times • The drift lines are more complicated when there is a magnetic field component along the sense wire , Bw . • we used different methods for the parametrization with Bw and Bn. A. Gresele - CMS week

  5. 5 • Drift Lines • when • Bw = 0.3 T A. Gresele - CMS week

  6. 6 Drift Time Variations with the track angle when B = 0 • To study the dependence of the drift time on the track, we calculated the difference between the drift time with   0 o and  = 0 o . • This variation is given in function of the track angle for 3 points , x = 0.6cm, x= 1.1cm and x = 1.6cm. • xpos = 0.6 cm • xpos = 1.1 cm • xpos = 1.6 cm A. Gresele - CMS week

  7. 7 Parametrization of Drift Times vs Bw • We performs the regressions on the data for each  , x and Bw with HPARAM • (in PAW). • This in order to find the best polinomial parametrization of the drift time. A. Gresele - CMS week

  8. 8 To study the quality of the fit we plot the difference between the parametrization and the points. These differences are   6ns. A. Gresele - CMS week

  9. 9 Parametrization of Drift Timeswhen Bn 0 xpos = 1.7 cm Bn = 1 T - Bn = 0 T • The time variation (t) due to Bn is essentially independent of the track angle up to 45o and is fitted with a constant(at fixed position). A. Gresele - CMS week

  10. 10 Final Parametrization of Bn • For each value of Bn the results of the fit were plotted as a function of the distance from the wire. • These points were then fitted with a straight line to obtain the final parametrization . • Bn=1.0T-Bn=0T • Bn=0.5T-Bn=0T • Bn=0.1T-Bn=0T A. Gresele - CMS week

  11. 11 Parametrization of Drift Timeswhen Bd 0 • The same procedure was used for Bd. • The deviations are very small and no correction is required. • Bd=0.30T-Bd=0T • Bd=0.15T-Bd=0T • Bd=0.03T-Bd=0T A. Gresele - CMS week

  12. 12 Using this method we obtain... total of: • 19 functions to parametrize Bw • 10 functions to take into account Bn A. Gresele - CMS week

  13. 13 Checks on parametrization • To check this procedure we generated 50 tracks at 3 points in the cell (x=0.2/0.4/0.6cm) where the expected deviations are largest.The angles and the magnetic field components ( Bn-Bw and Bn-Bd) were chosen randomly. • The differences between the generated drift times and those computed with the parametrization procedure are ,for Bn-Bw, within  8ns and ,for Bn-Bd ,within 6ns. A. Gresele - CMS week

  14. 14  and Bd , Bn components are chosen randomly. Bw = 0 T Bn-Bd  0 T A. Gresele - CMS week

  15. 15  and Bd , Bw components are chosen randomly Bd = 0 T Bn-Bw  0 T A. Gresele - CMS week

  16. 16 -30o <  < +30o  t   5ns Bw = 0 T Bn-Bd  0 T A. Gresele - CMS week

  17. 17 -30o <   +30o  t   5ns Bd = 0 T Bn-Bw  0 T A. Gresele - CMS week

  18. 18 Conclusions • The parametrization procedure looks reasonable. In fact the differences between simulated and parametrized times are less than 8ns ( less than 5 ns if 30o   30o ) ; • This parametrization is going to be introduced into CMSIM. A. Gresele - CMS week

More Related