1 / 7

Working in the Virtual Environment

Working in the Virtual Environment. Practical Experience Don.Gulliksen@US.Army.mil 973-935-2680. The Battlefield. network of men and machines composed of Army, Navy, AF, Marines composed of NATO, coalition forces all must execute missions collaboratively location of friends and foes

kohana
Download Presentation

Working in the Virtual Environment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Working in the Virtual Environment Practical Experience Don.Gulliksen@US.Army.mil 973-935-2680

  2. The Battlefield • network of men and machines • composed of Army, Navy, AF, Marines • composed of NATO, coalition forces • all must execute missions collaboratively • location of friends and foes • identification of current tactical capability of each • coordination across all organizational tiers • tactical decisions that support strategic goals • a logistics / supply system that • provides infrastructure (roads, bridges, airfields, buildings) • provides supplies (food, medical, fuel, ammo) • provides maintenance (repair parts, diagnostics, support)

  3. The Development Team • multinational members (international standards committees) • joint forces (Army, Navy, AF, Marines) • multiple R&D centers (armaments, missiles, automotive, etc.) • constantly changing requirements (Vietnam, Cold War, Iraq) • thousands of development partners, suppliers, mfr’s • located throughout the world • all with different schedules • all with different levels of commitment • all funded from different sources

  4. Old Approach • make each weapon better than your enemy’s • the best tank • the best rocket • the best fighter airplane • the best artillery piece • make each weapon capable of operating autonomously • give it its own sensors • give it a large ammo capacity • give it its own targeting algorithms • give it redundant weapons for varied threats • design and build it with one team at one location • expensive and slow • optimized for a specific enemy • unable to operate in a multinational networked battlefield

  5. New Approach • the battlefield as a system of systems • each weapon system dependent on the others • each weapon system modeled prior to building prototypes • models run in battlefield simulations to eval performance • simulation network is distributed across all R&D centers • each center provides weapon system models as req’d • each center provides developer expertise as req’d

  6. The Challenge • hundreds of scientists and engineers working together • developing common network interfaces • operating on common battlefield terrains • using compatible computers, O/S, languages, databases, etc • massive configuration control issues • colossal resource (people / equipment) scheduling issues • continuous discussion to determine the path forward

  7. The Result • we struggled with the available tools • email • phone calls • travel to meetings • we needed the next generation of tools • blogs • wikis • twitter • we needed the next level of training • social networking in a business environment • awareness of virtual team challenges and capabilities • system engineering in a highly virtual environment

More Related