1 / 20

Understanding the ACCESS for ELLs ®

Understanding the ACCESS for ELLs ®. Dr. Tim Boals Executive Director of WIDA Dr. Margo Gottlieb WIDA Lead Developer Dr. Dorry Kenyon Director of Language Testing: Center for Applied Linguistics. The WIDA Consortium. Wi sconsin D elaware (2002).

khanh
Download Presentation

Understanding the ACCESS for ELLs ®

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Understanding the ACCESS for ELLs® Dr. Tim Boals Executive Director of WIDA Dr. Margo Gottlieb WIDA Lead Developer Dr. Dorry Kenyon Director of Language Testing: Center for Applied Linguistics

  2. The WIDA Consortium Wisconsin Delaware (2002) District of ColumbiaRhode Island, Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Illinois (2003) Alabama (2004); New Jersey, Georgia (2005); Oklahoma, Kentucky (2006), North Dakota, Pennsylvania (2007) WIDA states represent 450,000 English Language Learners.

  3. Title III Requirements of the “No Child Left Behind Act” • Title III: English Language Proficiency standards linked to state academic content standards. • Titles I & III: All K-12 English language learners must be assessed annually in the domains of listening, speaking, reading, and writing (with a derived comprehension score). • Each state must set ‘Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives’

  4. Language vs. Content Language proficiency revolves around the language associated with the content areas Academic achievement reflects the knowledge and skills associated with the content. WIDA ELP standards and the ACCESS for ELLs® focus on academic language.

  5. WIDA Approach: ELP testing must… • Be aligned to ELP Standards • Address academic language • Be linked to classroom instruction • Encourage content-based instruction and professional development • Provide informative results • Meet legal requirements

  6. Presentations Today • Margo: Alignment of Standards as a Source of Validity for ACCESS for ELLs® • Dorry: ACCESS for ELLs®Scores, Reliability and Validity • Tim: Understanding for the District/School Levels

  7. Things to consider when examining and interpreting ACCESS for ELLs® results • Be familiar with the ELP Performance Definitions • Target certain reports to specific stakeholders • Consider summarizing or consolidating the suggestions for using the information from each score report according to target audience. • Look at different configurations of data in the reports for individual and group placement or to develop a plan for organizing services for English Language Learners for the coming school year.

  8. Types of Reports • Individual student Parent/Guardian Report • Individual student Teacher Report • Student Roster • School Frequency Report by grade • District Frequency Report by grade • Electronic data (available from MetriTech)

  9. Parent/Guardian Report

  10. Programmatic Implications Beginners (levels 1 – 2) Entry5 or 6 more years of support • Survival English briefly • Content-based strategies and L1 • Scaffolding in programs and schoolwide • Graphic support • Peer support • Supplemental and modified materials

  11. Mid-Level Scores (levels 2 - 3) 2 or 3 More Years Support • Teaching language through content (grade level standards) • Long term commitment • Oral language vs. literacy development • Typical student vs. Japanese student example • L1 where feasible

  12. Programmatic Implications – High Scores (above level 4) Monitoring or Targeted Support • Exit? Additional evidence? • Weak domain (e.g., writing) • Weak standard area • Content language support

  13. Comprehensive School Reform for ELLs(Education Alliance, Brown University, 2003) • Schools must understand basic characteristics of ELLs (replace myths) • Long term support for content and language development • Grade level standards but varied and comprehensible materials and approaches (scaffolding)

  14. Comprehensive School Reform for ELLs(Education Alliance, Brown University, 2003) • Everyone has a role: • State: More tools, benchmarks, PD, (leadership) • District/School: Admin support and schoolwide staff development (access at grade level) • Teachers across programs: working together (comprehensibility)

  15. Pitfalls of traditional, ineffective programs • Program focuses most of the staff time on students at English proficiency levels 1 - 2. Very little time left to help students at levels 3 – 4 and beyond. • Program is designed as an early-exit, “intensive English” program.

  16. Pitfalls of traditional, ineffective programs (2) • School does not recognize in a consistent, meaningful way the native language or culture that the student brings to the classroom. • Few teachers understand the issues and needs of ELLs. Most teachers are under the mistaken impression that the program will “fix” the student in two years and that they do not need to address the issue.

  17. Pitfalls of traditional, ineffective programs (3) • Program does teach some academic content, but mostly remedial, or basic skills. • Program attempts to align curriculum with grade level standards, but largely fails to do so because common planning time doesn’t exist (or any structure to promote collaboration). Tim Boals

  18. The solution to English Language Learner underachievement will come, in great part, from better mainstream classroom instruction. ELL support teachers must begin to see their role as supporting mainstream teachers as much as supporting English language learners. (Adapted by Tim Boals, based on National Research Council conclusions, 1997)

More Related